On 22/07/16 10:34, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 21/07/2016 5:48 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I just had a revision of a package built by win-builder, as a way of
exposing it to a rigorous check before uploading it to CRAN.
The 00check.log contained the note:
> Possibly mis-spelled wo
On 22/07/16 10:00, Ben Bolker wrote:
Previous conversation on r-devel:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2014-December/070237.html
Martin Mächler suggests that a patch to R-devel would be welcome:
I agree that some customization possibility would be great here.
Maybe it'll be
ind anything about "mis-spellings" in "Writing R
Extensions".
I don't like leaving a package in a state in which the package checker
produces NOTES. Is there anything that I can do about this one? Other
than remove the offending words, which I am reluctant to do.
ch
On 22/07/16 10:37, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 22.07.2016 00:34, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 21/07/2016 5:48 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I just had a revision of a package built by win-builder, as a way of
exposing it to a rigorous check before uploading it to CRAN.
The 00check.log contained the note
On 24/04/17 11:36, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/04/2017 6:18 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 23/04/17 23:05, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Looks like
extern void F77_NAME(mnnd)(double *, double *, int *, double *,
double *);
to me.
One more (I hope it's the last!) question:
One of my subroutines has
On 24/04/17 11:22, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
I would be surpised if init.c was Fortran. Anyway...
It isn't of course. But it is the device used for "registering
routines" of all both flavours (i.e. both C and Fortran).
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
On 24/04/17 10:31, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 24 April 2017 at 10:18, Rolf Turner wrote:
| One more (I hope it's the last!) question:
|
| One of my subroutines has an argument of type *logical*. There is no
| logical type in C. So, since I am perforce using C-speak, I cannot
| change "
On 24/04/17 12:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/04/2017 7:53 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 24/04/17 11:36, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/04/2017 6:18 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 23/04/17 23:05, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Looks like
extern void F77_NAME(mnnd)(double *, double *, int *, double *,
double
On 23/04/17 09:44, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 23 April 2017 at 09:25, Rolf Turner wrote:
| However I found a posting by Ege Rubak on this topic which sent me by a
| slightly roundabout route to a posting by Dirk Eddelbuttel
There is a transcribed Umlaut in there: Eddelbuettel (ie 'ue
ble precision(a-h,o-z)
.
I.e. the "actual types are "double precision",
"double precision", "integer", "double precision",
"double precision".
So in this case I should (?) replace
extern void F77_NAME(mnnd
Thanks for trying, but your example blows me away completely.
cheers,
Rolf
On 23/04/17 14:47, Avraham Adler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Rolf Turner <r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
The foregoing "official" way would seem to apply to functions called by
"
On 12/11/17 08:08, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:
It is more subtle than that.
\Sexpr triggers the creation of "partial Rd database" which becomes part of the
built package (the tar.gz file), although what exactly happens may also depend on 'stage'
options of the \Sexpr's.
... However when I do the
On 10/11/17 09:29, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for me:
On 10/11/17 12:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
[Rolf Turner wrote:]
... when I do the "R CMD
build" thing, when it comes to the "* building the PDF package manual"
step it says "Hmm ... looks like a package" (no shit, Sherlock!) and
emits a huge amount of verbose
On 10/11/17 13:10, François Michonneau wrote:
A github search might be helpful to identify packages that define macros
in their Rd files:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93=user%3Acran+extension%3Ard+newcommand=Code
Thanks. Looking into it.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
as to what I *should* be doing?
Ta.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 19/05/18 07:44, Ben Bolker wrote:
I notice that when I say help(package="MASS") I get separate indices
for functions and data sets. AFAICT this doesn't seem to occur in other
packages that have both functions and data sets (e.g. mgcv, lattice,
lme4), despite the tags \docType{data}
(and it is also prudent to keep a Changelog!) to the effect "Version
i.j-k never installed on CRAN".
But as I said, I am no expert. Younger and wiser heads may chip in with
advice that is more sound.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
On 06/01/18 16:19, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 2018-01-05 20:52, Rolf Turner wrote:
In a help file that I am writing I wish to cite an item by a bloke
whose surname is Weiß.
Write it "Weiss".
See "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F;.
That name is
.
Of course I could just write "Weiss", but that's *so* non-U! :-)
Thanks for any ideas.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
R-package-devel@r-project.o
in locales that cannot represent
the encoded form). (This is
intended to be used for individual words, not whole sentences or
paragraphs.)
Hence a preamble with, e.g.
\encoding{latin1}
or
\encoding{UTF-8}
and later writing \enc{Weiß}{Weiss} seems most appropriate here.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.01
On 08/02/18 07:49, Rami Krispin wrote:
I follow the example of the R Packages book about depreciating a function
It would be helpful if you were to distinguish between the words
"deprecate" and "depreciate". They are *VERY* different words.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
)) {
cat("Package 'loon' is not available.\n")
cat("Sorry 'bout that, chief!\n")
return(invisible())
}
Thereby no error is thrown. The user may be unhappy with the result,
but he or she would have been similarly unhappy with the error, and
there is no w
is created in the *base*
package, not in the global environment.
E.g.:
# Freshly started R session.
> find(".Options")
[1] "package:base"
> options(mung="gorp")
> find(".Options")
[1] "package:base"
> options("mung")
$mung
[
fference is that AssetPricing involves no dynamically loaded
Fortran code, whereas the package that I am currently fooling about with
*does* involve such code. (But neither "foo()" not "bar()" make direct
calls to .Fortran().)
Grateful for any insights.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
/07/2018 6:57 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Recently I experimented with assigning a variable within the environment
of a function in a package that I am developing. Slightly more
explicitly:
In a function "foo()" in the package, I have lines like:
big <- 42
assign("big"
Fortune nomination!!!
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
On 14/07/18 11:52, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/07/2018 11:10 PM, R. Mark Sharp wrote:
I had a few week development hiatus with
ase point me in the
direction of correctness?
Note that there is indeed a function cpp_object_initializer() in the
Rcpp package.
If more detail is required in order for guidance to be provided I am of
course more than happy to supply such detail.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research F
Thanks Dirk. Your suggestion worked perfectly. (See inline below.)
On 1/18/19 2:50 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 18 January 2019 at 11:59, Rolf Turner wrote:
|
| I am build a package in which there is a function which calls upon the
| function brm() from the brms package.
|
| In my
It's hard to be sure without seeing your package, but it *sounds* as
though you have a data set "Brom" (in /data ?) but you have
*documented* a data set named "brom". So you should either change the
name of the data set to "brom" or change your help file to document "Brom".
It is of
On 1/18/19 4:08 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 18 January 2019 at 15:13, Rolf Turner wrote:
|
| Thanks Dirk. Your suggestion worked perfectly. (See inline below.)
Glad to hear.
Something is off the rocker here as you should not have to do anything here
besides importing brms::brm
On 22/03/19 11:18 PM, Jim Lemon wrote:
Hi,
I have been attempting to check a new version of the prettyR package,
and have struck a difficult problem. The check fails at the
installation, and when I track the error, it is "Unexpected end of
input" in the xtab function. I have tried a number of
d do something about this note. (Non-portability
is indeed an egregious sin.) How can I tell gcc not to use these flags?
Note that the NOTE does not arise unless I use the "--as-cran" flag.
Thanks for any insight.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P.S. I am running Ubuntu 18.04. Happy to supply any
On 4/06/19 4:51 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 June 2019 at 16:42, Rolf Turner wrote:
| I am working on a revision of my Iso package (which hasn't been revised
| for quite a while) and have added in registration of Fortran routines
| that are called directly by .Fortran() in R functions
you that you should have done
R CMD check prabclus_2.3-1.tar.gz
(the latter being what "R CMD build prabclus" creates).
If you did in fact do "R CMD check prabclus_2.3-1.tar.gz" then I
apologise for being patronising. In this case I have no insight
whatever as to wha
I may well be toadally out to luntch here (if so please excuse the added
noise) but perhaps the following may be of some help or relevance.
In a package that I wrote, I wanted to include the ß symbol in *.Rda
file. After a lot of thrashing about (and seeking advice from younger
and wiser
verlooking
something) any equivalent in the Rd syntax of \hspace{} in LaTeX.
Can anyone suggest any possibilities?
Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
On 13/07/19 9:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/07/2019 9:43 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
This is fussing over a very minor issue, but ... well, I have OCD, I
guess.
I've tried adding extra "blank" columns between my real columns (extra
\tab's with blank fields) but these have
On 2/07/19 11:13 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Could R CMD check be using valgrind to run the examples? Valgrind has
to interpret CPU instructions manually to be able to warn about
results of code execution depending on memory values it considers
undefined, so it is much slower than execution on a
is the downside of setting version=2?
What are the consequences/what is the downside of adding the dependency
on R >= 3.5.0 into my DESCRIPTION file?
Who gets shafted by each of these two possibilities?
Which is recommended?
Grateful for any pearls of wisdom.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Hon
On 15/07/19 12:19 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 14/07/2019 7:52 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
In a package (say "clyde") that I am building I save a number of
datasets in clyde/data via something like:
save(melvin,file="~//clyde/data/melvin.rda")
When I build "clyde
in a package, personally I would use version 2.
That's my gut reaction as well. Thanks for the advice.
cheers,
Rolf
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 4:52 PM Rolf Turner <mailto:r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz>> wrote:
In a package (say "clyde") that I am building I save a num
Many thanks to Henrik Bengtsson and Martin Maechler for pointing out
that I can monitor progress by looking at the file
"mypkg.Rcheck/mypkg-Ex.Rout"
e.g. by using "tail -f". This strategy indeed revealed where the hangup
was happening. I wrapped a line of the examples in \dontrun{}
reduce
the amount of time needed for checking). The default value is nrep=100.
R.
Iñaki
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 11:32, Rolf Turner wrote:
Many thanks to Henrik Bengtsson and Martin Maechler for pointing out
that I can monitor progress by looking at the file
"mypkg.Rcheck/mypk
rather
tedious. Is there any to get some diagnostic output as to, e.g. which
example is being checked at the given moment? Doing R CMD check --help
does not reveal any useful looking options.
Thanks for any tips.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
Unive
which example was the culprit (by doing
tail -f pkge-Ex.Rout), that I could use \dontrun{} on all of the *other*
examples and get the same puzzling behaviour. This speeded up the
process considerably.
Don't know if there is any message to take away from all of the
foregoing (other than that Rol
I am developing a package ("ldEst" --- lethal dose estimation) for a
group of consulting clients. (The package may in the future be released
upon the unsuspecting public, but for the moment it has to stay
confidential, sad to say.)
The clients run Windoze (sad to say). In the past I have
.
Sorry for the noise.
cheers,
Rolf
On 5/11/19 12:37 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I am developing a package ("ldEst" --- lethal dose estimation) for a
group of consulting clients. (The package may in the future be released
upon the unsuspecting public, but for the moment it h
any hope of getting a useful
response. I, at least, have no idea what you are talking about. It is
possible, of course, that other, more enlightened, readers of this list
may understand immediately.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University
ted a package about 18 hours ago, and so far not a
sausage. Although it's churlish to complain, one gets used to a service
that has been provided and gets annoyed when the service disappears.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone:
On 1/03/20 11:44 am, Max Kuhn wrote:
On February 29, 2020 at 5:06:35 PM, Rolf Turner (r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz
<mailto:r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz>) wrote:
On 1/03/20 2:23 am, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Is it down again? I'm seeing the same problem again.
> Hadley
>
> On Sat, Fe
On 1/03/20 2:40 pm, Hugh Parsonage wrote:
Are CRAN staff located in Europe only? Is there a case to have a limited
staff across multiple timezones with a rolling roster? Obviously if
something is reported it’s best if it can be actioned immediately.
Just to be clear, it is winbuilder, and
On 5/03/20 9:04 pm, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
On 3/5/20 4:26 AM, John Lawson wrote:
I see this error on the CRAN Check report
Fatal error: the condition has length > 1
The problem is that the condition t1 == "I" & t2 == "(" of the if
statement in the code is not a scalar. Even though this
blah_1.1-1.zip, and this was indeed the required
Windoze binary.
Ta-da!!! Victory. I hope that those who are as mentally handicapped as
I am find the foregoing useful.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext.
On 6/03/20 11:41 am, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
1. I'd guess it helps Uwe a bit you clarify exactly which queue you
think is stuck - otherwise he has to check them all. They're independent.
Yeah. Sorry. It's the R-release queue.
2. You can look at the different win-builder queues yourself
On 6/03/20 11:14 am, Ben Bolker wrote:
It's probably been suggested already in this thread, but perhaps
rhub would work for you as an alternative?
Quite possibly, but I have no real idea what "rhub" is. I've seen it
referred to many times but the references always assume that you
On 4/02/20 3:03 am, profjohn wrote:
While there are huge benefits to upgrading, there is pain. It's that
pain that keeps people on OS versions that are older but still in the
LTS [1] period.
Fortune nomination!
cheers,
Rolf
[1] Long Term Support
--
Honorary Research Fellow
On 17/04/20 8:41 pm, Uwe Ligges wrote:
keywords are not mandatory.
You can invent your own keywords and use them in
\concept{}
entries.
Thanks Uwe. This has given me new insight and enlightenment!
cheers,
Rolf
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
On 17/04/20 12:14 pm, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 16/04/2020 8:12 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
I'm writing a package (just for my own use, for the time being at least)
that contains a function for estimating the parameters of a
distribution. The function is essentially a wrapper for fitdistr
ot;point estimation") or something like that, but
there isn't.
I guess I can use "utilities" (???) or "misc", but these seem a bit
unsatisfactory.
Can anyone suggest a better idea?
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of St
On 26/03/20 5:16 pm, Steven Scott wrote:
Rolf, I will strive to do better.
Please note that you load a package with library(...). Just sayin'.
Yeah, this issue has arisen/been discussed (on R-help I think) in the
past. The rationale is that you use the library() function to "take a
that that can on occasion have unfortunate
consequences.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch
On 23/04/20 11:03 am, Bert Gunter wrote:
OS: Mac OSX Catalina
R Version 3.6.3
UTF-8 declared as Encoding in DESCRIPTION file
First, apologies: I'm nearly certain that this has been asked (many
times) before, and I think I know the answer. But I need to verify.
\eqn{...} allows me to insert
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:09:34 -0500
Spencer Graves wrote:
> Hello, All:
>
>
> "R CMD check Ecfun_0.2-5.tar.gz" with R 4.1.0 under macOS
> 11.4 gave "Warning in dir.create(vd2 <- "vign_test") : 'vign_test'
> already exists". It ultimately said, "Status: OK", so maybe I
> shouldn't
emory.
I'm running Ubuntu 20.04.2 and R version 4.0.4.
Has anyone else ever been confronted with this bizarre phenomenon?
Thanks for any tips.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:09:51 +0100
Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> Am 04.03.21 um 10:24 schrieb Rolf Turner:
> > But this still leaves the question: Why the is
> > R CMD check telling me to use the flag --resave-data, when I *just
> > did that*???
>
> Yes, indeed
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 08:12:40 -0600
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> All the while we all carry on and just slap the four or five lines
> onto the file make it an Sweave vignette _without any executed code_
> which works in base R today as a proxy for pure LaTeX, just as it has
> for 25 or so years.
to be
substantially out of date. They refer to putting vignettes in
/inst/doc and I'm pretty sure that this is no longer how it's done.
(But I find all of the vignette business rather bewildering and
confusing.)
Grateful for any advice.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
admirably comprehensible, even to a Bear of Very Little
Brain, such as my very good self. Haven't tried it yet, but it looks
like I'll be able to cope. Thanks very much.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 e
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:44:31 +0100
Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> Am 04.03.21 um 01:41 schrieb Rolf Turner:
> >
> > ... by using R CMD build --resave-data
> >
> > But I *did* use that flag with my build command!!! And yet "R CMD
> > check" seems t
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 22:25:59 -0800
Ott Toomet wrote:
> As I read the docs (a few months ago though), you are supposed to
> include the pdf and encouraged to include sources, but the process to
> get pdf from source may depend on your private
> libraries/data/software, and is not replicated on
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:39:31 +0100
Göran Broström wrote:
> Hi Rolf,
>
> On 2021-03-04 03:51, Rolf Turner wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to create a vignette in a package (basically just using
> > LaTeX code; no R calculations or data are involved).
> >
&g
Thanks Dirk. Sorry for being so slow to express my thanks.
I've been, uh, distracted. Have not yet tried out your demo;
I will shortly.
Thanks again.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
ities will ensue.
As I say --- I think this can all be made to work. But
Am I missing some "obvious" strategy? I.e. is there a
better/simpler/less convoluted way of handling this problem?
Grateful for any pearls of wisdom.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Hon
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 02:03:41 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 21/10/2021 12:40 a.m., Andrew Simmons wrote:
> > I think the simplest answer is to store the variable in the
> > functions frame. I'm assuming here that the only plot.foo needs
> > access to .fooInfo, if not this can be changed.
> >
variables?
Can anyone give me any guidance? Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
__
R
ffensive in the email from Prof. Ripley
that was copied and pasted into that posting.
I find *your* email far more offensive than anything that Prof. Ripley
has ever written. Get a life.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P.S. See fortunes::fortune(88).
R. T.
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of
I'm having a problem please excuse the noise.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:22:34 +0300
Ivan Krylov wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:31:31 +
> Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> > I do not understand:
>
> >* the reference to inst/doc (there is no such directory)
>
> When you run R CMD build in order to produce a new
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 05:34:26 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 19/10/2023 8:17 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
> >
> > In a package that I maintain, there are examples, in the *.Rd files,
> > that take an excruciatingly long time to run. This makes package
> >
e this problem?
I guess I could simply *not* Suggest ionChannelData. But what then, is
the point of the option of including an Additional_repositories field in
the DESCRIPTION file?
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretar
by the
> user.
> }
> \author{Hoo Hee
> \email{hoo@somewhere.otr}
> }
> \keyword{internal}
Then if someone types, e.g., "help(clyde)" they get the processed
form of the forgoing *.Rd file displayed, and are thereby told that
they probably shou
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:19:06 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> However, some users are package writers. Once their package is on
> CRAN, it can be really inconvenient for you to change the behaviour
> of internal functions that they use, because CRAN will object if your
> change breaks their
ge AQLSChemes was
> removed from CRAN, and what do I need to do to restore it to CRAN?
As Roy Mendelssohn has pointed out, AQLSChemes is there on CRAN.
Perhaps you need to re-install it on your machine.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of A
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:42:54 +1300
Rolf Turner wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:01:18 -0600
> John Lawson wrote:
>
> > I published the R Package AQLSChemes on CRAN in May 2022. The book
> > "An Introduction to Acceptance Sampling and SPC with R" was
> &g
with CRAN about
such problems.
Allow plenty of time between submitting successive sub-packages.
Give plenty of notice to users and maintainers of dependent packages.
Hope this helps.
cheers,
Rolf Turner (on behalf of Adrian Baddeley and Ege Rubak)
P.S. I hope that this posting is not too late t
from shooting themselves in the foot. However if they
really want to shoot themselves in the foot, that's their call.
Anyway, users can always get at non-exported functions using ":::".
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Aucklan
N about
such problems.
Allow plenty of time between submitting successive sub-packages.
Give plenty of notice to users and maintainers of dependent packages.
Hope this helps.
cheers,
Rolf Turner (on behalf of Adrian Baddeley and Ege Rubak)
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
ageStartupMessage(paste(pkg, ver))
> msg <- paste("\n This package, \"foo\" is now",
> " deprecated. Users",
> "\n should install and use its",
> " successor \"bar\".\n&quo
est an
explanation for this phenomenon? (I *hate* being ignored! ️ )
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
__
hough. I suspect
> the initial connection may have been faulty.
Well, it may not have been 10 minutes, but it was at least 5. The
problem is persistent/repeatable. I don't believe that there is any
faulty connection.
Thanks for the insight.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
De
seems an eternity (5 or
10 minutes).
Why does this step take so long? Surely the software just has to check
that there is web connection to a CRAN mirror. I would have thought
that this would be executed virtually instantaneously.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department
k on "Eglhmm".
Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
\name{monoCyteSim}
\alias{monoCyteSim}
\alias{bivarSim}
\alias{ccSim}
d the data sets bivarSim
and ccCM, whence the warning. Makes perfect sense now.
It turns out I can make the warning go away by removing the lines
\usage{
bivarSim
ccSim
}
They serve no useful purpose and are not required.
Thanks again.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fe
Well, I just uninstalled the devtools that I had installed from github
and ran
install.packages("devtools",lib="/home/rolf/Rlib")
No error message this time; the install went just fine.
The explanation may lie in the plethora of packages that I re-installed
when I invoked
devtools seemed to get installed. Now "library(devtools)" runs without
error, so I am happy with my own situation. However there seems to be
a problem with the devtools package on CRAN, which ought to be fixed.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department
that I was *sure* I had saved the emails
pertaining to this discussion, but now I cannot find any trace of what I thought I'd saved!]
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 11:39:28 +1100
Hugh Parsonage wrote:
> It would have been helpful for that person to specify their candidate
> regex, rather than just saying it could be simpler.
Actually they *did* specify; the problem was that my ageing senile
memory could not recall the specification.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:19:41 -0600
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 23 February 2024 at 15:53, Leo Mada wrote:
> | Dear Dirk & R-Members,
> |
> | It seems that the version number is not incremented:
> | # Archived
> | arrow_14.0.2.1.tar.gz 2024-02-08 11:57 3.9M
> | # Pending
> |
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
