--- Begin Message ---
Hi All;
In defining the roles in Description file of a package, has there been any
thought of adding a role of maintainer separate from creator (cre). While the
definition given says:
> cre: the creator or maintainer, the person you should bother if you have
>
--- Begin Message ---
Hi All:
I am working on preparing a package for submission. All the package does is
makes it easy to map data that were downloaded using a different package. Can
graphics be in examples? Or should I assign the graphics to an object and
leave it at that. Or any other
unning examples during
> an 'R CMD check' run.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
> On 19.03.2019 19:03, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote:
>> Subject:
>> Graphics in examples
>> From:
>> Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
>> Date:
>> 1
--- Begin Message ---
Hi All:
The package I am trying to get ready for submission has a Vignette that does a
number of data downloads and some complicate maps with satellite images. While
it knits on my computer, on checks it times out. I am looking for ways to
speed it up, but my question
I have been having similar problems with win-builder release for the last
several days. It appears that some of the needed DLLs are not there. I have
been reporting them to Uwe, and he is working through resolving the issues.
Part of it is the test fails on one DLL, and then when that is
--- Begin Message ---
Hi All:
My memory is that this was discussed here, but i can't find the emails,
including in the archives ( i did find a similar query from Yihui on r-dev.).
Probably there, I am just not seeing it. In the package I am working on for
submission, when I load the
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks. I thought I remembered seeing this discussed. I was looking in the
archives for this list, not r-help.
-Roy
> On May 18, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2019 3:42 p.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
>
:23 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 18/05/2019 4:03 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 18/05/2019 3:42 p.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via
>> R-package-devel wrote:
>>>
>>> My memory is that this was discussed here, but i can't find the emails,
>
--- Begin Message ---
HI All:
I have a package I am developing that depends on a package that was just
accepted and appears on CRAN. Do Winbuilder and rHub update daily, or if not,
what is the usual lag for new packages to appear on the test machines. Or may
generally, is there a way to
lable for incoming checks,
> perhaps with some short technical delays of less than one hour.
>
>
> For winbuilder on demand checks, there may be a lag of 2 days. Requests may
> be considered.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 19.05.2019 20:09, Roy Mendelssohn -
--- Begin Message ---
HI:
Though you appear to have found the problem. it is a package called plotdap,
the Ubuntu results are here:
https://builder.r-hub.io/status/plotdap_0.0.1.tar.gz-5e8cf0d2b8304290820438dde5593e27
The complete build attempt was:
> #> * installing *source* package
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks muchly. That looks like I what I was after. otherwise I was going to
have to put tictoc on each chunk.
-Roy
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 2:21 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 02:41, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via
> R-package-
--- Begin Message ---
Hi All:
I am checking a package I am hoping to submit to CRAN on RHub. The Windows and
Fedora runs worked but the Ubuntu test ended because of the following:
> #> Warning messages:
> 3203#> 1: In i.p(...) : installation of package ‘rgdal’ had non-zero exit
> status
>
Hi All:
The recent nighty CRAN checks on one of my packages reports:
Check: data for non-ASCII characters
Result: NOTE
Note: found 1 marked UTF-8 string
When originally submitted this was not the case. All my data files are .RData
files, and even more so most are binary data. If
persists - like
rgdal, rerddap, crul, ncdf4).
-Roy
-
> On Aug 5, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2019 10:51 a.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>> Hi All:
>> The recent nighty CRAN checks on one of my packages reports
;>
>> -Roy
>> -
>>> On Aug 5, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2019 10:51 a.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via
>>> R-package-devel wrote:
>>>> Hi All:
>>>> The recent nighty CRAN checks
of required packages, something I have reported but still persists - like
> rgdal, rerddap, crul, ncdf4).
>
> -Roy
> -
>> On Aug 5, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>> On 05/08/2019 10:51 a.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
>> wr
e
>
> if (requireNamespace("rgdal")) {
> # code that needs it
> }
>
> I think this will mean you need to add rgdal to the Suggests list for your
> package to avoid other warnings.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>> Thanks,
>> -Roy
>>> On Jul
not calling these
packages directly so I should not need to Import them.
Thanks,
-Roy
> On Jul 25, 2019, at 12:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 25/07/2019 3:21 p.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>> I have been testing a package for resubmission with
Hi All:
A few days ago I had to resubmit because an external URL I was using in my
vignette changed and the nightly builds were issuing warnings. This morning a
user reported a bug. I have the fix and a new version, but the test machines,
and I suppose it will also be true of CRAN, are
Hi All:
I am wondering if it is possible to find out when packages that use the netcdf
libraries are built on the CRAN machines (such as ncdf4) what versions of the
netcdf library are being used on at least Mac and Windows?
If this is the wrong place to ask, please point me to where I should
Thanks all. I asked because I don't want to unnecessarily overburden the CRAN
maintainers. In this case, it wasn't a minor bug.
-Roy
> On Sep 25, 2019, at 4:36 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 24 September 2019 at 11:43, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via
> R-pack
use this::use_cran_comments()
There is a place to put that it is a new submission
I would recommend also testing using:
devtools::check_win_release()
devtools::check_win_devel()
You should only have the one note that it is a new submission. When you
submit, you may or may not get a note
I am seeing the same problems still. I am using devtools, and am failing on
the ftp, with both win_release() and win_devel().
Thanks,
-Roy
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 2:00 AM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
> Please resubmit, we had a space problem oin the check machine.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
> On
es
>
>
>
>> Same for R-devel. Permission problems?
>> Thanks,
>> -Roy
>>> On Oct 14, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/10/2019 10:26 a.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via
>>> R-package-devel wrote:
&
0/2019 10:26 a.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>> I am seeing the same problems still. I am using devtools, and am failing
>> on the ftp, with both win_release() and win_devel().
>
> Have you tried submitting using the instructions on th
Download the 'rhub' package. Then submission to 'rhub' is one easy command.
HTH,
-Roy
> On Mar 5, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>
> On 6/03/20 11:14 am, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>
>
>> It's probably been suggested already in this thread, but perhaps
>> rhub would work for you as an
Hi Spencer:
I think that message means what it says, and I read it as pretty
straightforward and business like. The issue is not web scraping. There are
two errors here:
1. You can not write to the user's space without first explicitly asking
permission of the user. The suggested policy
Hi All:
I still get a little confused on what it means if a package is listed in
"Suggest" in my package. I have been working to try and keep dependencies
down. One of my packages produces maps with data, and I have been asked if the
maps can be made interactive. It turns out this can be
Thanks. And thanks for the tip.
-Roy
> On Feb 4, 2020, at 10:20 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2020 1:13 p.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>> Hi All:
>> I still get a little confused on what it means if a package is liste
Did you check on https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard? If it is a
first time submission, there is a code review and that can take some time.
-Roy
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 3:56 PM, Marcelo Araya Salas wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I submitted a new package to CRAN a couple of weeks ago.
always *think* I'm testing very carefully, and I almost always get
> something wrong ...)
>
> On 10/23/20 11:18 AM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>> I test my packages very carefully before submission. Earlier today I
>> submitted
I test my packages very carefully before submission. Earlier today I submitted
a package that passed this morning on both winbuilder_release and
winbuilder_devel. The pre-test submission failed on rebuilding the vignette.
I just tried again on winbuilder_release and winbuilder_devel, no
Just out of curiousity, how is pretest order determined? I have a package
that was submitted yesterday that is still waiting pretest, while one I
submitted today was just pretested. Both are just bug fixes of existing
packages, not new packages.
Thanks for the info and the work on CRAN,
sed
> stuck in the queue, will clear that up shortly.
>
>
> Best,
> Uwe
>
> On 23.10.2020 19:17, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote:
>> Just out of curiousity, how is pretest order determined? I have a package
>> that was submitted yesterda
Hi All:
A few days ago I put on CRAN a new version of a package. Since then it has
thrown some errors, all do to the fact that sometimes on CRAN the rebuild of
the Vignette fails. I received a notice about this from CRAN. Now however,
when I test on winbuilder, I get a Note because of the
I have a package on CRAN that has a graphics component that calls a package
that ultimately calls 'rgdal that CRAN is unhappy about. 'rgdal' now throws a
warning if 'crs' is used, and unless I am misreading the problems (see
Street
> Laramie, WY 82072
> 307-760-4721
> www.west-inc.com
>
> Trent McDonald
> Principal Statistician
>
> Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc.
> Environmental & Statistical Consultants
> 1610 Reynolds Street
> Laramie, WY 82072
> 307-760-4721
> www.west
I have found win-builder timings come close, but only close. My experience is
that the CRAN timings were uniformly slower than those on win-builder. But I
also find that I can get quite significant differences between
win-builder-release and win-builder-devel. So I also take the slowest
Hi All:
I am working on a small bug fix in a package, and on winbuilder_devel (not on
release) I get the following Note:
> Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
> URL: https://erddap.marine.ie/erddap (moved to
> https://erddap.marine.ie/erddap/)
> From:
Thanks. I had checked for that but at first didn't find the one instance where
this occurred. Got it.
-Roy
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22.10.2020 23:15, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote:
>> Hi All:
>&g
After looking up matrixcalc on CRAN, I would recommend contacting the
maintainer, who is listed as:
> Frederick Novomestky
The reason I say this is what is blowing up the package in the nightly builds
is a careless error in one Example:
> > x <- matrix( c( 2, 4, 2, 1, 3, 1, 5, 2, 1, 2,
Hi Uwe:
Is what you described the preferred way to change maintainers (I have just
taken over another package), or would you prefer receiving an email from the
old maintainer before the submission?
Thanks,
-Roy
> On Jul 1, 2021, at 8:38 AM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01.07.2021
n run
>> one of the R-hub containers, e.g.
>> https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/rhub/debian-gcc-devel and
>> then try to fix the installation issue. Or you can try a bigger
>> container that tries to mirror CRAN exactly:
>> https://hub.docker.com/r/cran/debian
&g
Hi All:
I still have problems with checking one of my packages on RHub running Debian,
as the Preprocessing fails in building in some of the needed spatial packages.
This problem was reported quite awhile ago, and never appears to have been
completely fixed. Is there an alternate place I
Thanks.Will do so,
-Roy
> On Apr 9, 2021, at 4:23 PM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09.04.2021 21:02, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote:
>> Just trying to get some information about the CRAN nightly tests. Are all
>> the test
b/debian-gcc-devel and
> then try to fix the installation issue. Or you can try a bigger
> container that tries to mirror CRAN exactly:
> https://hub.docker.com/r/cran/debian
>
> Gabor
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 6:49 AM Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via
> R-package-
Just trying to get some information about the CRAN nightly tests. Are all the
tests for a particular package run a the same time? If not, is there any way
to determine when a particular test was last run (there is a time at the top of
the page, but it may or may not apply to all of the
To the best of my knowledge, new submissions always get that note, and new
submissions are handled differently, as they are given closer inspection by a
human, and since this is all-volunteer the amount of time that can take for the
code review can vary greatly. If you are greatly concerned
s/examples
> that depend on access to the inaccessible internet resources, or values
> derived from the failing call, to work)
>
> Does that help?
>
> On 9/24/21 10:49 AM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote:
>> Hi All:
>> I am gett
> On Sep 24, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 24/09/2021 11:27 a.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>> Just so I am clear, I should not call stop(), but instead call a return()
>> and return something or other (there is nothing
ave.
-Roy
> On Sep 24, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Bill Dunlap wrote:
>
> Can you tell if the failure to download was due to a Solaris-specific issue
> or due to the Solaris test machine not being fully connected to the internet?
>
> -Bill
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 7:50 AM Roy M
try/stop is in the operational code. But it is easy enough to make it so that
the code always returns something, even when there is an internet access
problem.
As I said, if "failing gracefully" and ever actually been defined with
examples life would have been much easier for a number of
Hi All:
I am getting dinged again on CRAN (just Solaris for some reason), and the
problem is how to exit if there is a failure of accessing the resource, I know
it has been discussed here before, but I just am not understanding what is
desired to end properly. As I have been reminded:
I am not sure who is the appropriate person to contact, but thought I would
try here since WInbuilder is a big help in package testing. Winbuilder appears
to be down at the moment.
Thanks,
-Roy
**
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S.
he queue. Not sure that
> is definitive evicence.
>
> Michael
>
> On 18/10/2023 16:16, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel wrote:
>> I am not sure who is the appropriate person to contact, but thought I would
>> try here since WInbuilder is a big hel
https://cran.r-project.org/web//packages/AQLSchemes/index.html
-Roy
> On Oct 25, 2022, at 2:01 PM, John Lawson wrote:
>
> AQLSChemes
**
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S.
Government or NOAA."
**
Roy Mendelssohn
I run into this all the time. The trick is to find a minimal example that the
package will work with that shows how to make a call, and allows for CRAN,
especially on new submissions, to test to some extent that the function works.
For more real-life examples, write a good vignette that
Thanks!. It tried it again, got a 404, then tried it again, got the site.
I will take it up with the people in charge.
-Roy
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 1:55 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
> I get a 404.
>
> On 2022-09-29 4:50 p.m., Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package
In testing a new version of one of my package on win builder, I get the
following:
Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
.
.
.
URL:
https://www.integratedecosystemassessment.noaa.gov/regions/california-current-region/index.html
From: inst/doc/Using_rerddap.html
Status: 404
Hi All:
About a week ago I received a notice that my package 'rerddapXtracto' was
failing nightly builds and i needed to fix it or face being archived. Fair
enough. The next day I submitted a fix. My package has one example that
always comes in just above the time that is checked for. That
to be about.
-Roy
PS - If a do take over hoardr, what is the process for becoming the new
maintainer of a CRAN package
> On Dec 11, 2022, at 3:45 AM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:00:22 -0800
> Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>
give
you one guess who from CRAN sent me the notice, As I said, I don't know how
to fix something when everything I am have available to behaves properly.
Thanks,
-Roy
> On Dec 10, 2022, at 2:16 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 10 December 2022 at 14:00, Roy Mendelssohn - N
nteraction. If CRAN reports this to you,
> they see it. You should have access to `tempdir()` and friends to make things
> per-session, or else you need to ask the user (once) and then store in
> user-supplied location. I think that was discussed here recently.
>
> Good
CRAN has sent me a notice about the following:
https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/donttest/rerddapXtracto.out
I can not reproduce it. I test on my Mac, the cache space is properly handled
(by a package outside mine). Same with Debian on r-hub. I installed Fedora
on a virtual machine, no
> On Aug 11, 2023, at 1:41 PM, J C Nash wrote:
>
> - Is there an M1Mac test platform to which packages can be submitted? Brian
> Ripley did have one, but trying the link I used before seems not to present
> a submission dialog.
Perhaps:
https://mac.r-project.org/macbuilder/submit.html
-Roy
> On Dec 16, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Christiaan Pieterse
> wrote:
>
> I checked the tar file using *R CMD check --as-cran
> "iopspackage_2.1.0.tar.gz". *This yielded errors, warnings and notes
> which I don't know how to solve and suspect are due to me setting the file
> up wrong.
A good
And a second good starting place would be:
https://r-pkgs.org
HTH,
-Roy
> On Dec 16, 2023, at 9:48 AM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 16, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Christiaan Pieterse
>> wrote:
>>
>> I checked the tar file using *R CMD check --as-cran
>>
68 matches
Mail list logo
