before submitting.
Why did the latest Rdevel (2015-06-01 r68455) CMD check --as-cran not find them?
Your R was not libcurl enabled nor had you the spellchecker installed, I
guess.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Below are the relevant excerpts.
Thanks for any hints about what I may have done wrong,
Berry
they have to
e-mail me regarding this point?
Please explain in your submission comment that the web address is
provided in the Description of the package and use the full URL
(inlcuding http://;).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I should say that most of the functionality and purpose of the nadiv
package
Use winbuilder, it runs 32-bit and 64-bit R tests on a Windows 64-bit
platform. Not sure how you implemented the different precisions, but
just go ahead and try on winbiulder.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 17.08.2015 11:03, Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
Dear all,
Is there an easy way to run the tests
Most of this has been answered by others already. Note that package base
itself is always imported into the Namespace but names from the other
packages are not and really need to be if actually used.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 29.06.2015 19:09, Kevin Ushey wrote:
Hi Uwe,
It seems like
::matches even work when it is not
an exported function?)
If it is any package you use in private you can use triple colons. If
you want the package to be published on CRAN, then you must not use
non-exported functions (hence not in the API of the package).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
Jon
have:
checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE
Found the following apparent S3 methods exported but not registered:
head.SQLiteConnection
So register it as an S3 method in your NAMESPACE file.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
#' Return the first n elements of a SQLiteConnection object
Sounds like a good proposal, but currently this is not implemented.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 22.07.2015 01:10, François Michonneau wrote:
Hello all,
As I can only easily access computers with Linux, I am very grateful
for the existence of win-builder to test my packages with Windows.
Today
not many maintainers succeeded to get us convinced...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r
a DESCRIPTION
file so cannot be built as a package.
Is it spelled all upper case? Do you have read permission?
If on Windows: Is there some hidden filname extension?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Glenn
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch
as a library as well in
the command, or should I define a .Rprofile in the current diractory?
What is the best approach in such a situation?
Install into that other library and temporarily set R_LIBS_USER that
points to that additional library.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
Rainer
Please try again now.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.09.2015 20:59, Benjamin Leutner wrote:
To supplement my previous email:
here is a link to the source bundle if that helps
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bleutner/RStoolbox/gh-pages/RStoolbox_0.1.0.tar.gz
On 04.09.2015 10:34, Benjamin Leutner
I do not know devtools:
If it worked for you for the initial submission and the CRAN team did
not complain, please resubmit in the same way - and keep in mind you
want to check the package in advance using a very recent version of R.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.06.2016 18:49, Luck Buttered wrote
dows I see
a string which seems to start:
lower case i possibly with an umlaut
closing guillemet
inverted question mark
hash symbol
I guess the file is UTF-8 encoded and you read it under Windows as
latin1 or therelike, so declare an encoding.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
whereas the GNU/Linux exam
'?
The reviewer uses a recent version of R-devel (i.e. a daily built), a
recent set of packages (i.e. run update.packages() first) and then
R CMD check --as-cran (well, at least similar, but you will get the
warnings you talk about if you do that, as I already told you when you
asked CRAN).
Best,
Uwe
admins patience?
Please only fix the one that needs fixing, all other do not need to be
changed then.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best regards,
Pedro.
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Indeed, from Writing R Extensions:
"double quotes should be used for quotations (including titles of books
and articles), and single quotes for non-English usage, including names
of other packages and external software."
Best,
Uwe
On 02.03.2016 09:53, Martin Maechler wrote:
Hana
On 03.05.2016 21:31, ProfJCNash wrote:
I noted that my nlmrt package on CRAN has package usl as a "reverse
imports". In a modest search I have yet to find a definition of the
term. Does anyone have a pointer?
That means usl imports from your nlmrt package.
Best,
Uwe Lig
On 08.05.2016 17:44, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/05/2016 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 8 May 2016 at 16:18, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| On 08.05.2016 16:13, carlos cinelli wrote:
| > How should
On 22.07.2016 00:48, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 22/07/16 10:37, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 22.07.2016 00:34, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 21/07/2016 5:48 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I just had a revision of a package built by win-builder, as a way of
exposing it to a rigorous check before uploading it to CRAN
that patches are still welcome....
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
I have a very vague recollection of having seen something about this
topic on this mailing list, but a search of the archives turned up
nothing. Nor could I find anything about "mis-spellings" in "Writing R
Extensi
On 03.08.2016 16:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 3 August 2016 at 16:00, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| On 03.08.2016 14:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Then again, users of TravisCI know that just toggling
| >
| > _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE
|
| I was travelling, hence a delayed response
On 03.08.2016 17:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 3 August 2016 at 16:21, Uwe Ligges wrote:
|
|
| On 03.08.2016 16:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 3 August 2016 at 16:00, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| > | On 03.08.2016 14:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > Then again, users o
CRAN will follow up with the package maintainer.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.08.2016 10:50, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 04 Aug 2016, at 05:21 , Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote:
On 3 August 2016 at 22:26, Bob Rudis wrote:
| I came across https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/box
requires it or "Suggests"
because no end user ever needs it?
If "Depends", then it leads to over-installation of the package by end
users who don't care about running tests locally. If "Suggests", then
all of the tests would fail (assuming that Dirk's suggesti
a point for the discussion, because there is even a CRAN
policy that explain the procedure if there is really need (which should
be carefully decided) to break things.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
[1] actually, once we know a pkg is Recommended, the
'if(requireNamespace)' could even be absorbed
it helps for the majority of developers and users.
As an example, I nneed to explain myself again and again what "Enhances"
means (and perhaps I am still doing it wrong).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
-Thomas
[1]
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#Package-Dependencies
Thomas
On 03.08.2016 14:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 2 August 2016 at 19:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| Why not put together code to implement your idea, and see how big the
| problem would be to phase it in, by seeing how many packages fail under it?
Ahh, the old 'put-up-or-shut-up' gambit, very
Check whether the parallel cluster is closed. Can it be that the cluster
is still open and the check process waits for them to complete?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 31.01.2017 13:45, Patrick Schratz wrote:
Hello,
when running R CMD check / devtools::check, section "running
s shipped is the one you built locally.
CRAN tests if it can be rebuilt.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/list
On 04.08.2016 17:46, Paul Gilbert wrote:
(One question from the thread Handling Not-Always-Needed Dependencies?)
I hope not to start another long tangled thread, but I have a basic
confusion which I think has a yes/no answer and I would like to know if
there is agreement on this point (or is
for R < 3.3.0 and to gcc
4.9.3 for R >= 3.3.0. If your package fails for gcc 4.6.3 we can live
with it.
Same for the other platform CRAN runs checks for, typically there is one
compiler (as specified on the CRAN web pages).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Op do 25 aug. 2016 om 12:17 schreef
I guess they got corrupted during some system problems on winbuilder
last night, new (complete) versions are already waiting to be synced by
the CRAN master server (without manual interaction).
Best,
Uwe
On 12.09.2016 12:00, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
Dear all,
I accidentally noticed that some
Update:
The https://cran.r-project.org/package=NAME/ syntax works now and is
accepted.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 21.09.2016 14:20, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 21/09/2016 7:57 AM, S Ellison wrote:
> How can I link to a certain page on CRAN without getting flagged for
non-
> canonical CR
).
Note that this is a bad idea.
Your users may not have write access to that folder, e.g. for network
wiede installation as the one at my department.
Also, you have to ask users (por let them enter a path or file) before
writing somewhere on the filespace if not tempdir().
Best,
Uwe Ligges
th ggplot2 (< 2.2.0)...
They will fit to the ggplot2 version that is available.
So, my question is, as maintainer of ggpmisc and ggspectra, should I
release new versions that import ggplot2 (>= 2.2.0)?
Not needed.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
This would be easy enough, and in the c
Use forward slashes in file specification such as c:/Users/rampa/
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 01.11.2016 14:49, Rampal Etienne wrote:
Dear all,
When I try to build a Windows binary in RStudio using R-devel,
everything goes well until the packages is tested whether it can be
loaded. I then get
On 01.11.2016 15:56, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 01/11/2016 9:49 AM, Rampal Etienne wrote:
Dear all,
When I try to build a Windows binary in RStudio using R-devel,
everything goes well until the packages is tested whether it can be
loaded. I then get the error:
** testing if installed package
not sure if it has been orphaned is that I am having
trouble viewing the orphaned package listing. The following page is
blank for me (shows no package listings):
https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Orphaned
-jsta
Hard to say without knowing which package you are taking about.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
to the auto-rejection message
and explain the situation.
The CRAN team probably will decide to special case the package then so
that the vignettes are not checked.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 07.04.2017 06:15, Ian Carroll wrote:
With `BuildVignettes: no` in my DESCRIPTION and `^vignettes` in my
,
David
David
On 7 April 2017 at 07:15, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote:
I do not know devtools, but the vignette sources should be placed in
./vignettes and then R CMD build will put the files into the
rel
I do not know devtools, but the vignette sources should be placed in
./vignettes and then R CMD build will put the files into the relevant
places automatically.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 07.04.2017 07:55, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
Okay, so this got tumbleweeded... so should I file a bug?
D
A race condition on the check system.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 18.04.2017 13:22, Nathaniel Phillips wrote:
In submitting my package yarrr v0.1.5 to CRAN (https://github.com/
ndphillips/yarrr), I received the following error:
* installing *source* package 'yarrr' ...
** R
** data
*** moving
s-ci (also with as--cran option active) didn't catch the
problem. Are there different check settings active on the different builds
?
Yes, but in this case all shluld have got the same problem unless you
are using the function only under non Windows OS?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks in advance
.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.08.2017 17:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 12 August 2017 at 15:40, Jernej Jevšenak wrote:
| Ok, I see now, that actually everything is OK.
|
| ERROR on older versions of R is therefore not a problem, right?
"Ideally" those would show OK too but it is of lesser
Just set
.libPaths("/tmp/current")
and then
library(devtools)
shoudl do the trick.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 28.06.2017 22:23, Bill Denney wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a script to test my library (PKNCA) for what the minimum
required version of its dependencies are. Specifically, I'v
of Makevars.win files from other GSL using packages ...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 30.06.2017 13:57, Nicolas Hiot wrote:
Hello,
I'm the developer of a package for R, it's work fine on my computer but
when I publish it the installation failed due to the external library.
My C code needs GSL (GNU
with versions named
with underscores but do not want to remove them until a later release.
However I received a `pre-test archived` email from the CRAN team:
Resubmit and once you get the auto-rejection reply to the CRAN team
explaining it by what you wrote here.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
package
a
random error. How long does processing your vignettes take?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 24.04.2017 05:43, Jeremy Volkening wrote:
Henrik,
A completely different alternative, is to have a way to disable
parallel processing in your examples / tests / vignettes, e.g. if (np
== 1) registerDoSEQ
This was a bug in R-devel for few days that has been fixed this morning.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 24.04.2017 17:58, Bailey, Paul wrote:
I'm trying to submit a package and I get an odd error when I run R CMD check
--as-cran on R-devel and I only bring this up because I don't get with 3.4.0
it in the
DESCRIPTION file as
Imports: MASS
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Is there any other solutions?
-
Jang Ik Cho, MS
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Case Western Reserve University
Graduate Research Assistant, SR2C
Graduate Research Assistant, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA
There are packages where examples do not make sense, hence we do not
generally reject such packages.
But if adding examples are reasonable we ask for them.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 10.05.2017 17:28, Neal Richardson wrote:
Hi,
Last week I submitted a new package to CRAN, and it was rejected
check
log and package on some web resources so that poeple are able tpo help?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Uwe Ligges
<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> wrote:
On 17.05.2017 16:34, michel.grze...@inrs.fr
<mail
Well, not running an examples because of an error is a bad idea, you
should fix the issue that caused the error first.
And when I meant you should make available package and check log I meant
the version where you did not hide the problems.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 18.05.2017 10:55, dharmapal
This should be resolved in general now.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 03.06.2017 15:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 3 June 2017 at 08:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 27 May 2017 at 22:18, Emmanuel Blondel wrote:
| | Dear Uwe, i clearly understand the CRAN team needs time on this. I have
Ligges!
This was checked with a recent submission of package dplyr that was
about to be published on CRAN at the same time but was a bit too
restrictive about R verisons.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:48 PM, DeCicco, Laura <ldeci...@usgs.gov> wrote:
I am unable to
Please take the package tarball you submitted to CRAN and unpack it. It
does *not* contain the files.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 19.05.2017 20:18, Dean Attali wrote:
I'm trying to submit an update to a package 'ddpcr'
Here are the pretest logs:
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest
For geometa:
If you resubmit without the access to "img.shields.io", we can publish
now. Otherweise, as we have not yet managed to get a univesally working
pandoc on the CRAN master, we cannot publish your package yet.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 27.05.2017 16:20, Emmanuel Blondel wro
On 27.05.2017 16:37, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 2017-05-27 9:25 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
For geometa:
If you resubmit without the access to "img.shields.io", we can publish
now. Otherweise, as we have not yet managed to get a univesally
working pandoc on the CRAN master, we cann
This is currently under inspection by the CRAN team. Apparently
img.shields.io have changed the cypher settings and pandoc fails with
the new settings. We may have to disable *.md processing for some time.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 25.05.2017 20:59, Emmanuel Blondel wrote:
Dear all,
I've just
for the CRAN namespace and nobody
else can submit another package under such a name is an issue to be
considered.
So for the archives, as Duncan says: You have to have a very good reason
to justify publication of an updated package under a new name.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Duncan Murdoch
On 11/06/2017
enough; and what's mysterious is that *coda* passes the CRAN
checks without this same NOTE.
Yes. coda had the name for a very long time and it was not reasonable to
fix this naming in felicity later on, hence there is a check exclusion
in R-devel/src/library/tools/R/utils.R for as.mcmc.list in pa
uch a check-exclusion-inheritance
provision may not be very straightforward to implement.
Ideally, pkg_B avoids the infelicities that had been established with pkg A.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Russ
-----Original Message-
From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de]
Sent: Thursday, May 4,
the sources.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Paul
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch
Alphabetical by filename.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Paul
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
hould have
files src/Makefile and src/Makefile.win (unless intended for only
Unix-alikes or only Windows)."
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.05.2017 17:09, Mark wrote:
Hi,
I am creating an R package with multiple c files within src directory.
If possible, I would like to create separate dll files
Submit B first and write in the submission comments that A will fail but
a version of A is ready to be submitted once B is accepted.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.05.2017 06:13, Johannes Ranke wrote:
how does one solve this catch-22?
I see these possibilities
a) reduce the precision
ave to add or change in order to
improve the gs quality to ebook?
Not sure about RStudio, but in R I'd use
R CMD build --compact-vignettes="both" ...
but note you need to have both gs and qpdf installed and on the PATH.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thank you,
Fernanda
[[al
when the
database is built. Hence either fill these with content or delete them
entirely.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
R CMD check results
0 errors | 0 warnings | 1 note
checking Rd files ... NOTE
prepare_Rd: QCAT.Rd:38-40: Dropping empty section \details
prepare_Rd: QCAT.Rd:56-58: Dropping empty section
just list rerddap in the depends, or
should I also list all the packages rerddap depends on - which can go many layers deep.
What is best practice for this?
Only rerddap, and ideally in Imports rather than Depends.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
-Roy
**
"The contents
Same from here, we have not had such a problem before, please resubmit
the package (we do not have it any more) and send us additionally a
separate mail to CRAN@... at the same time citing this communication.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.09.2017 05:28, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Looks like a hiccup
Hi,
If the images are also used for vignettes or Rd files, you can put them
in the 'vignettes' or 'man/figures' directories. Otherwise, please put
them in the top-level 'tools' directory, or a subdirectory of it.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 10.09.2017 00:15, Baptiste Auguie wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure
Dear package developers,
given some very recent changes in R-devel, many packages under R-devel
have to be reinstalled. Due to maintainance work on CRAN we probably
won't process submissions today. R-devel results from winbuilder will be
flaky at least during the next 10 hours.
Best,
Uwe
More important:
Checking should be performed on sources prepared by 'R CMD build'.
So at first prepare the sources via R CMD build and then check yourself
prior to submission following the CRAN policies. And *really* read that.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 27.09.2017 21:02, MTurgeon wrote:
Hi
which is in
development and will be released before R-devel, hence we check against
it, but it is rather instable and sometimes we cannot intsall the BioC
packagess yet.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
Can't you do it as, e.g. write.table() writes files: Simply require a
filename from the user, then you are on the save side. And in your
examples / tests, write to some tempfile().
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 25.08.2017 21:11, Jenny Bryan wrote:
I can't comment on the specific intersection of your
ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Apologies Dirk, I should have emphasized that this is on Windows 7. I
tried it on a Linux box later with no problem. I sent it to this list
because I thought it might be a general problem for package development in
Windows.
Could it be your Win
the files.
I tried using "dot_clean -m --keep=mostrecent /PlotMDS/man" and that didn't
seem to remove the file. I am not able to view the file (tried using sudo
ls).
ls -a
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Does anyone have any suggestions to help me? Any suggestions would be most
welcome and a
This is probbaly a race condition, please resubmit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 22.11.2017 16:49, Devin Incerti wrote:
Hi,
I have successfully run R CMD check for my package hesim (source
<https://github.com/InnovationValueInitiative/hesim>) on OSX sierra,
CentOS, Ubuntu 14.04 (on travis-ci), a
efined reference to
`_imp__fftw_plan_dft_c2r_1d'
| fftw_wrappers.o:fftw_wrappers.cc:(.text+0x33f): undefined reference to
`_imp__fftw_destroy_plan'
| fftw_wrappers.o:fftw_wrappers.cc:(.text+0x3bb): undefined reference to
`_imp__fftw_execute'
| collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit stat
outdated.
I see what I can do to update it during the next days.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Senren
*From:* Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
*Sent:* 01 December 2017 05
And of course, you can even tell the Rd file that it documents an
internal function.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 18.12.2017 09:01, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 18.12.2017 05:00, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Good day,
It seems that they are not internal functions if they are have user
documentation written
This confusion was caused by the CRAN team, who wrote you (Meabh
McCurdy) a message about adding missing copyright holders that should
have gone to the maintainer of anotehr submission.
Our apologies.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.12.2017 16:06, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 12 December 2017
ly
happened exactly at a moment where the new Matrix package was
already there, but not quite
seems quite improbable, but then your problem seems "rare"..
Perfect analysis: Race condition. Happens from time to time.
Can you simply resubmit it, please.
Best,
Uw
m?
Tell the CRAN team. For winbuilder: Tell me. ;-)
I will update shortly.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Kind regards,
Fabian Bachl
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/l
Now insalled, please resub,it the package now.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 08.11.2017 17:21, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 08.11.2017 14:25, Fabian Bachl wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to submit a package to CRAN that depends on INLA, which
itself
is not on CRAN. However, INLA is installed
And even this cannot work for strong dependencies, as sztrong
deendencies must be available from mainstream repositoreis.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 08.11.2017 17:59, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
I think you should be using:
Additional_repositories: https://github.com/mrdwab/SOfun
since
d function "globalVariables"
Can you grep for globalVariables in your code?
THis is from package utils and hence you may have to declare it.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
...
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE
See
https://win-builder.r-project.
Then simply explain this situation to the CRAN team and "they" will
probably let the package pass.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.11.2017 14:25, Jorge Cimentada wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of submitting a package to CRAN and I've run into an
issue with the examples of some functions. T
nsider
simplifying your examples a little bit to get shorter run times. Also
you may use \dontrun{} to avoid running a specially heavy example.
Ideally use toy examples so that they can be executed quickly. not only
preferabble for CRAN but also for your users to be able to quickly s
apsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.69 0.15 17.24
geocode_cadastral0.13 0.03 17.73
-> Please reduce each example to less than 5 sec.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
May I discard this notes and carry on the submission process arguing
is a false positive or do I n
Dear package developers,
the CRAN submission queue closes and will be offline from Dec 22 to Jan
3 due to CRAN team vacations and maintainance work on the CRAN check farm.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
know.
Also note that we will probably continue to build Windows binaries (and
have never stopped doing so).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Kind regards
Jens
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2017 um 12:27 Uhr
Von: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>
An: r-annou...@r-project.or
CXX_STD =
CXX11 to Makevars. This is external code from postgres that is used to
build libpq.
See Writing R Extesions on how to ask for C++11
Best,
Uwe Ligges
THK
http://www.keittlab.org/
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package
please use tempdir() in the examples.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 21.12.2017 09:21, Blume Christine wrote:
Hi Cathy,
I also had troubles with debian (Fedora only gave warnings) and no problems
with other systems. Mine was related to me writing a file (or rather trying to
write) in a working
cally installed or I need
to list them somewhere else as well?
Better use namespace directives to import from them and list them under
Imports. But yes, that is sufficient.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks,
Polychronis
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
On 13.05.2018 10:00, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Good day,
That form solves it, but there's nothing in the Cross-references secion of the
manual which suggests that it is necessary.
Indeed, that part of the manual seems outdated, will discuss internally.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
You need
\link[limma]{limFit}
see Writing R Extensions.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 13.05.2018 04:00, Dario Strbenac wrote:
Good day,
If limma has already been installed, such as by
source("https://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R;)
biocLite("limma")
and the attached minimalist R p
on CRAN, e.g. for
Rnightlights:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Rnightlights.html
Noet that Windows typically takes much longer as some parts of the
checks are performed for 32-bit and 64-bit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 21.05.2018 18:16, Chris Njuguna wrote:
Thanks Uwe,
I think
On 21.05.2018 18:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 21 May 2018 at 17:46, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| In addition to what Dirk said, I just added this experimental test for
| CRAN incoming checks few days ago and it should not reject but lead to
| manual inspection, this will be fixed on CRAN side
Strange, I see the packages apparead in the queue and was processed
automatically, but neither you nor we got a message from the system.
Perhaps network problems?
Can you please submit that version again?
Best,
Uwe
On 22.05.2018 13:20, David Winsemius wrote:
I'm wondering if I should have
1 - 100 of 515 matches
Mail list logo
