then there is
also limited value in me making the effort.
I have now fixed the message formatting in that issue just in case Rfast
maintainers want to have a look at it.
Vincent
Op di 6 feb. 2024 21:34 schreef Ivan Krylov :
> В Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:27:32 +0100
> Vincent van Hees пишет:
>
> >
Hello,
I noticed that there is no r-oldrel-linux-x86_64... on the CRAN
package results page. Does this mean that CRAN checks no longer run on
old Debian releases?
The reason for asking this is that I am struggling to install Rfast on
Ubuntu 18, which made me wonder whether CRAN/R community no
issue
>
> TZ=NZ R CMD check --as-cran
>
> Apologies if this is just noise but whenever I've had issues with
> datetimes and mac tests this is the first thing I check.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, at 9:28 AM, Vincent van Hees wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
age-called-rcmdcheck-but-unclear-how-to-account-for-timezone/166876
... I should have thought about that first.
Vincent
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 10:28, Vincent van Hees
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the recommended way to create a virtual machine or cloud based R
> environment for debugging R p
Hello,
What is the recommended way to create a virtual machine or cloud based R
environment for debugging R package issues specific to OS macos-arm64?
Details:
CRAN results show macos-arm64 specific problems for my package:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_GGIR.html. I am able
I ran into the same issue last week with .Rd files that were
previously accepted on CRAN and concluded that the package checks are
becoming more critical about this aspect of Rd syntax, which is good.
To reproduce the note outside R-devel and by that identify which files
in your package are
Dear all,
This is not a question.
I just put a blog post online with a lengthy overview of how I have
developed and maintained the R package GGIR as available on CRAN for
the past 10 years:
https://www.accelting.com/updates/10th-anniversary-of-ggir/
The package itself is probably not of interest
:22, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 6 July 2023 at 08:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | On 6 July 2023 at 14:31, Vincent van Hees wrote:
> | | Thanks, in that case the REPLEX for the issue may need to be:
> | |
> | | > remember = Sys.getenv("_R_CHECK_A
> > #> 1 2023-07-06
> > lapply(dat, as.data.frame)
> > #> Warning: Direct call of 'as.data.frame.Date()' is deprecated. Use
> > #> 'as.data.frame.vector()' or 'as.data.frame()' instead
> > #> [[1]]
> > #> X[[i]]
> > #> 1 2023-07-06
>
Dear all,
I see the following warning in my package test results:
```
Warning
Direct call of 'as.data.frame.POSIXct()' is deprecated. Use
'as.data.frame.vector()' or 'as.data.frame()' instead
```
The warning is not always there and I struggle to make it reproducible. I
have encountered it in
Dear all,
I am looking for guidance (blog posts / books / people with expertise) on
how to split up an R package that has grown a lot in complexity and size.
To make it worthwhile, the split needs to ease the maintenance and ongoing
development.
Here are my quick reflections on it:
1. Where
Dear list,
Is it possible in .Rd documentation to load and use data inside an
item-field like we can integrate R data in text in R markdown files?
Something along the lines of:
\item{max}{
Numeric, default value = `R max`, controls the upper limit of the plot.
}
where `R max` resolves into the
mple below
is ambiguous and only the end-user knows whether B should be 2 or 4.
Either way, I will just implement my own solution. Just wanted to report
that I ran into this situation and maybe others too.
Best, Vincent
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 17:24, Vincent van Hees
wrote:
> Thanks Duncan, I have
st:
> myfun(A = 1, B = 2, B = 4)
[1] 3
# So, the second B is ignored.
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 17:03, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 08/11/2021 10:29 a.m., Vincent van Hees wrote:
> > Not sure if this is the best place to post this message, as it is more
> of a
> > suggestio
Not sure if this is the best place to post this message, as it is more of a
suggestion than a question.
When an R function accepts more than a handful of arguments there is the
risk that users accidentally provide arguments twice, e.g myfun(A=1, B=2,
C=4, D=5, A=7), and if those two values are
/1358170607314235392
Best,
Vincent
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 16:32, Vincent van Hees
wrote:
> Hello,
> My R package submission got rejected today because of the URL libcurl
> error code 35 issue below (see heading Attempt 1). It seems I have a
> subscription to these errors, because I have been gettin
Hello,
My R package submission got rejected today because of the URL libcurl error
code 35 issue below (see heading Attempt 1). It seems I have a subscription
to these errors, because I have been getting them a lot through the years.
Next, I edited the URL and submitted the package to R-devel on
wrote:
> At the minimum you should look at the “moved to” URLs and change your
> links to those (some are outright changes in URLs that were redirected and
> some are http to https changes).
>
> Bryan
>
> > On Aug 26, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Vincent van Hees
> wrote:
> >
Hello,
URL errors in my DESCRIPTION file and package vignette are not picked up
when I do R CMD check --as-cran or devtools::check(). I only know about
these errors because CRAN has rejected my package submission and instructed
me to fix the urls (example at end of this message).
I am trying to
ome
> directory. This is not allowed. Probably by accident your test creates
> "~/testcsv4.csv" (the same problem is present for other test files).
>
> Best
> Tomas
>
> On 9/13/19 1:21 PM, Vincent van Hees wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have a
Dear all,
I have a test in my R package that passes in OSx on Travis-CI, but it does
not pass in OSx on CRAN. What does pass on both CRAN and Travis are the
Linux tests. Also, on CRAN the Windows flavor passes. So, there seems to be
an issue specific to the combination OSx and CRAN.
The easiest
Dear all,
One of my package dependencies was taken from CRAN a month ago, with
the CRAN message: "...check problems were not corrected despite
reminders" as displayed on the deprecated CRAN package page. I
immediately got in touch with the deprecated package maintainer and
learnt that he is
22 matches
Mail list logo
