Simon,
On 24 April 2023 at 18:28, Simon Urbanek wrote:
| thanks - the problem is that there is not a single installer package (for
several years now), so that URL is ambiguous. Whether the missing link is a
good or bad depends on how it is used. I would argue that any link to that URL
is
Dirk,
thanks - the problem is that there is not a single installer package (for
several years now), so that URL is ambiguous. Whether the missing link is a
good or bad depends on how it is used. I would argue that any link to that URL
is inherently bad, because there is no way of knowing that
The URL ${CRAN}/bin/macosx/R-latest.pkg is in fairlt widespread use. A quick
Google query [1] reveals about 1.1k hits. And it happens to be used too in a
CI job a colleague noticed failing yesterday.
The bin/macosx/ page now prominently displays both leading flavours
R-4.3.0-arm64.pkg
