On 23/02/2023 1:11 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
Not important (of course) but where does the 5000 kWh per tree number
come from? Is that (dry weight) x (50% carbon per dry weight) / (carbon
content of CO2 emissions per kWh) ?
On 23/02/2023 1:11 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
Not important (of course) but where does the 5000 kWh per tree number
come from? Is that (dry weight) x (50% carbon per dry weight) / (carbon
content of CO2 emissions per kWh) ?
That's just made up, but it is close to the numbers here for dry
Not important (of course) but where does the 5000 kWh per tree number
come from? Is that (dry weight) x (50% carbon per dry weight) / (carbon
content of CO2 emissions per kWh) ?
https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator#results
If we say 200 watts x 15 minutes
Hi Martin.
I think your calculations are way off. A one-tonne tree contains about
5000 kWh of energy. A typical computer server uses about 200 watts, and
can process many jobs simultaneously on different cores, but let's say
the whole server is dedicated to the Github action. Then it would
> Spencer Graves
> on Tue, 21 Feb 2023 05:25:39 -0600 writes:
> On 2/21/23 2:34 AM, Vasileios Nikolaidis wrote:
>> Yes, with all this I can think where I may have messed up. So thanks for
>> the help, at least it verified it is indeed an issue with the code. As
>>
I will try it the "Github Action" it seems very useful indeed.
I already found the (extremely obvious and tiny) error that caused all
this mess. I am surprised the compile/link system on my Windows machine
passed on that without reporting anything. That really threw me off on
what the cause
On 2/21/23 2:34 AM, Vasileios Nikolaidis wrote:
Yes, with all this I can think where I may have messed up. So thanks for
the help, at least it verified it is indeed an issue with the code. As
far as OSs, I use Ubuntu variants a lot and (on several machines) but
these days I have easier
Yes, with all this I can think where I may have messed up. So thanks for
the help, at least it verified it is indeed an issue with the code. As
far as OSs, I use Ubuntu variants a lot and (on several machines) but
these days I have easier access to Windows (with WSL2 btw). I also like
a strict
On 20 February 2023 at 22:37, Vasileios Nikolaidis wrote:
| Thanks for taking the time to check it. The hint about the virtual
| 'layer' class is valuable.
| I will look into it.
Sounds good, glad to have been of assistance. On a lark, I also tried your
most recent CRAN release, and it
Thanks for taking the time to check it. The hint about the virtual
'layer' class is valuable.
I will look into it.
Best Regards,
V.Nikolaidis
PS I am tempted to set up a Debian test platform to speed up fixing the
package.
(Or abandon submitting the package to CRAN alltogether.)
Στις
On 20 February 2023 at 21:41, Vasileios Nikolaidis wrote:
| Oh yes thank you. I just realized I did not mention the repo on my
| previous reply. It is
| https://github.com/VNNikolaidis/nnlib2Rcpp
Thanks for that -- I can confirm the error.
The packages compiles all source files without issue
Oh yes thank you. I just realized I did not mention the repo on my
previous reply. It is
https://github.com/VNNikolaidis/nnlib2Rcpp
Στις 2023-02-20 21:23, Dirk Eddelbuettel έγραψε:
Can you share the repo URL? It may be a a fairly simple and standard
issue
some of us can spot easily.
Hth,
Can you share the repo URL? It may be a a fairly simple and standard issue
some of us can spot easily.
Hth, Dirk
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
Hello Spencer and thank you for your reply.
This is a good point as the package is indeed on GitHub, so I will
investigate it. But, like you pointed out, it is doubtful if testing on
these other systems (including Ubuntu) will catch a problem that is
reported on Debian.
And what causes it
Hi, Vasileios:
Do you have it on GitHub?
If yes, do you use "GitHub Action" to test the package on multiple
platforms? I'm a contributor to the "fda" package. It's version on
GitHub is configured so every "git push" triggers auto tests on five
different platforms, testing it
Dear R-developers, I apologize for posting something that has probably
been discussed before (but missed it while searching the archives).
While trying to submit a newer version of my package to CRAN, it is
rejected as it fails on Debian. I will call this package APACKAGE below
(although it
16 matches
Mail list logo
