Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

Thanks Dirk. IMO the package is in good shape otherwise. I'll wait hear from the CRAN maintainers. S On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote: > | These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote: | These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or std::function in the | STL implementation of the host machine. If I'm reading that wrong someone | please let me know. AFAICT it needs C++11 explicitly set which that machine (with a new

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN Pre-Test Problems -- FSA Package

I recently submitted a new version (v0.8.19) of my FSA package to CRAN. It was rejected at the pre-test level because of problems with automatic checks. There were three links for me to see what these problems were. The first link from CRAN was to a win-builder check log

[R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

I've been trying to update the Boom package to the next version, and it hasn't been going so well. Hoping someone can help me figure out what next steps I should take. I got the attached mail from auto-check. From what I can tell the new version of Boom (0.8.0) has two issues. Some long path