Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

[Steven Scott]

Thanks Uwe.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Uwe Ligges  wrote:

>
>
> On 21.04.2018 20:06, Steven Scott wrote:
>
>> No word from the maintainers.
>>
>
> Only one maintainer is reading this list.
>
>
> I submitted a revised version of the package
>> just now (with an updated date in DESCRIPTION).
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> If someone could look at it in the next few days I'd appreciate it.
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> We will do.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Steven Scott <
>> steve.the.bayes...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Dirk.  IMO the package is in good shape otherwise.  I'll wait hear
>>> from the CRAN maintainers.
>>> S
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
 On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote:
 | These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or std::function
 in
 the
 | STL implementation of the host machine.  If I'm reading that wrong
 someone
 | please let me know.

 AFAICT it needs C++11 explicitly set which that machine (with a new
 clang-6.0
 installation) did not provide by default.  This has bitten a few other
 compilations lately as well but should get sorted out in due course.

 Dirk

 --
 http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org


>>>
>>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> __
>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

[Uwe Ligges]

On 21.04.2018 20:06, Steven Scott wrote:
No word from the maintainers. 


Only one maintainer is reading this list.



I submitted a revised version of the package
just now (with an updated date in DESCRIPTION).


Thanks.


If someone could look at it in the next few days I'd appreciate it.  Thanks.


We will do.

Best,
Uwe Ligges

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Steven Scott 
wrote:


Thanks Dirk.  IMO the package is in good shape otherwise.  I'll wait hear
from the CRAN maintainers.
S

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel  wrote:



On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote:
| These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or std::function in
the
| STL implementation of the host machine.  If I'm reading that wrong
someone
| please let me know.

AFAICT it needs C++11 explicitly set which that machine (with a new
clang-6.0
installation) did not provide by default.  This has bitten a few other
compilations lately as well but should get sorted out in due course.

Dirk

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org






[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

[Steven Scott]

No word from the maintainers.  I submitted a revised version of the package
just now (with an updated date in DESCRIPTION).
If someone could look at it in the next few days I'd appreciate it.  Thanks.

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Steven Scott 
wrote:

> Thanks Dirk.  IMO the package is in good shape otherwise.  I'll wait hear
> from the CRAN maintainers.
> S
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel  wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote:
>> | These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or std::function in
>> the
>> | STL implementation of the host machine.  If I'm reading that wrong
>> someone
>> | please let me know.
>>
>> AFAICT it needs C++11 explicitly set which that machine (with a new
>> clang-6.0
>> installation) did not provide by default.  This has bitten a few other
>> compilations lately as well but should get sorted out in due course.
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>> --
>> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
>>
>
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

[Steven Scott]

Thanks Dirk.  IMO the package is in good shape otherwise.  I'll wait hear
from the CRAN maintainers.
S

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel  wrote:

>
> On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote:
> | These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or std::function in
> the
> | STL implementation of the host machine.  If I'm reading that wrong
> someone
> | please let me know.
>
> AFAICT it needs C++11 explicitly set which that machine (with a new
> clang-6.0
> installation) did not provide by default.  This has bitten a few other
> compilations lately as well but should get sorted out in due course.
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Fwd: [CRAN-pretest-archived] CRAN submission Boom 0.8

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

On 4 April 2018 at 14:15, Steven Scott wrote:
| These appear to be caused by an ill formed std::set or std::function in the
| STL implementation of the host machine.  If I'm reading that wrong someone
| please let me know.

AFAICT it needs C++11 explicitly set which that machine (with a new clang-6.0
installation) did not provide by default.  This has bitten a few other
compilations lately as well but should get sorted out in due course.

Dirk

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel