older version of gfortran-8, but then the next rebuild will cause
trouble): Dirk, any chance you could get the package maintainers to make
these changes?
Best
-k
> Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 15:03:54 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik:
>> >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes:
>> >
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote:
> | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about
> | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467)
> or
> | do we need to update configure as well
>>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> On 10 May 2019 at 13:46, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> | >>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> |
> | > On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote:
> | > | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know m
> Johannes Ranke writes:
Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in
testing/unstable, there are problems with the R BLAS/LAPACK API entries
using a Fortran interface (and hence in particular when using the BLAS
and LAPACK sources that ship with R). It seems I can avoid these
>>>>> Johannes Ranke writes:
> Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik:
>> >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes:
>> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in
>> testing/unstable, there are problems with the R B
>>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> On 29 April 2019 at 15:03, Kurt Hornik wrote:
> | >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes:
> |
> | > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik:
> | >> >>>>> Johannes Ranke
> Ivan Krylov writes:
> On Tue, 21 May 2024 07:08:02 -0500
> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> You cannot undo what it is in R's own /etc/R/Makeconf via a
>> programmatic way via some sort of option or alike.
> I think this is about the following line in debian/rules:
Without having looked in
7 matches
Mail list logo
