Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-13 Thread Johannes Ranke
> Anyway, it is great to have the extra flag. I just prepared r-base 3.6.0-2 > and it contains the new flag in /etc/R/Makeconf thanks to your changes to > configure{,.ac} which I "backported" to 3.6.0-2. It also includes the > whitelist for the non-portable compiler flags noise. Great! I just

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 May 2019 at 18:31, Kurt Hornik wrote: | Thanks. Btw, Tomas just told R Core that | | * | I had a quick look at reference lapack builds in different | distributions: looking at the disassembly, and specifically for dposv

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-10 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On 10 May 2019 at 13:46, Kurt Hornik wrote: > | > Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > | > | > On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: > | > | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much > about > | > | autoconf and Debian packaging:

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 May 2019 at 13:46, Kurt Hornik wrote: | > Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: | | > On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: | > | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about | > | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467)

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-10 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: > | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about > | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467) > or > | do we need to update configure as well

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 May 2019 at 10:52, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Thanks, that sounds good. But I need some help as I do not know much about | autoconf and Debian packaging: Is it enough to patch configure.ac (r76467) or | do we need to update configure as well (r76468)? Again, that would happen in the

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-10 Thread Johannes Ranke
Kurt, Am Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019, 16:35:24 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > > Johannes Ranke writes: > Johannes, > > It seems that one can avoid the gfortran problems with Fortran > BLAS/LAPACK implementations by compiling with > -fno-optimize-sibling-calls. ... > Yesterday I changed R-devel

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 May 2019 at 10:07, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Kurt, there is one thing that has been bugging me too and I was wondering if | I could lean on you as I have not had time work it out. It seems that one | "should" be to set an environment variable to suppress additional | "non-portable compiler

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 May 2019 at 16:35, Kurt Hornik wrote: | > Johannes Ranke writes: | | Johannes, | | It seems that one can avoid the gfortran problems with Fortran | BLAS/LAPACK implementations by compiling with | -fno-optimize-sibling-calls. | | Tomas recently wrote to R Core that | |

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-05-09 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Johannes Ranke writes: Johannes, It seems that one can avoid the gfortran problems with Fortran BLAS/LAPACK implementations by compiling with -fno-optimize-sibling-calls. Tomas recently wrote to R Core that * -

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-04-29 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On 29 April 2019 at 15:03, Kurt Hornik wrote: > | > Johannes Ranke writes: > | > | > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > | >> > Johannes Ranke writes: > | >> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in > | >>

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-04-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 29 April 2019 at 15:03, Kurt Hornik wrote: | > Johannes Ranke writes: | | > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: | >> > Johannes Ranke writes: | >> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in | >> testing/unstable, there are problems with the R

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-04-29 Thread Johannes Ranke
Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 15:03:54 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > > Johannes Ranke writes: > > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > >> > Johannes Ranke writes: > >> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in > >> testing/unstable, there are problems

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-04-29 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Johannes Ranke writes: > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: >> > Johannes Ranke writes: >> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in >> testing/unstable, there are problems with the R BLAS/LAPACK API entries >> using a Fortran interface (and

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-04-29 Thread Johannes Ranke
Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > > Johannes Ranke writes: > Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in > testing/unstable, there are problems with the R BLAS/LAPACK API entries > using a Fortran interface (and hence in particular when using the BLAS

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-04-29 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Johannes Ranke writes: Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in testing/unstable, there are problems with the R BLAS/LAPACK API entries using a Fortran interface (and hence in particular when using the BLAS and LAPACK sources that ship with R). It seems I can avoid these

[R-sig-Debian] R 3.6.0 for Debian buster

2019-04-29 Thread Johannes Ranke
Dear all, Now that the upcoming Debian release "buster" is frozen, I have started supplying backports for it. Pending mirror synchronisations, R 3.6.0 is now available for Debian buster on i386 and amd64 architectures. Please refer to https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/ for