Re: [R-sig-phylo] "Not of class phylo" error when lapply is used

This is cool — so this looks like it will work on a set of posterior trees even if they don’t all share the same topology? Jake > On Apr 10, 2018, at 3:37 AM, jschenk wrote: > > Thank you Graham, Liam, and Emmanuel for your suggestions. Applying the >

Re: [R-sig-phylo] "Not of class phylo" error when lapply is used

That’s right Jacob. Tracer will do the same thing if, and unfortunately only if, you predefine taxon sets in BEAUti. The problems with predefining clades in BEAUti are that (1) it is kind of a pain, (2) you often don’t know what the clades will be until after you conduct the analysis (as in