Now you're forcing me to write tests :D
2007/1/22, Sean Cribbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks good, Giovanni! A functional test would probably be all that is
necessary -- something that tests if the redirection works correctly, in as
many different cases as possible or reasonable.
Sean
On
Before changing how the caching works, I would ask, what are the reasons
for modifying caching. I can think of a few.
- It's annoying to have to clear page cache after every edit in order to
view your change.
The solution Dan suggests would make it possible to know exactly which
pages need
ROUGH STEPS TO CONVERTING A BEHAVIOR TO A PAGE TYPE PACKAGED AS A
RADIANT EXTENSION
I've ported all my own behaviors to Page Types packaged in Extensions
within the last day so my mind is fresh on the topic, however this is
by no means a comprehensive or even wholly accurate guide.
Use
Oops...
A zip of the ported commentable extension code can be found here:
http://www.fn-group.com/assets/code/commentable.zip
Sorry about the attachment for those of you who received it that way.
Loren Johnson
www.fn-group.com
___
Radiant mailing
Hi Loren,
Could you add this (and your previous mail) to the Wiki?
Thanks!
Erik.
Loren Johnson schreef:
Oops...
A zip of the ported commentable extension code can be found here:
http://www.fn-group.com/assets/code/commentable.zip
Sorry about the attachment for those of you who
Sean Cribbs expressed no desire to convert his Comments behavior.
Not exactly -- I just didn't want to do a direct port. Because you can have
models of your own in Mental, I saw no reason to keep storing comments as
grandchildren pages or having the double-loopback page redirect.
That said,
Well color me corrected. So perhaps this is worth revisiting later
but still before the official Radiant Blog functionality gets worked-
out (which could be quiet a while I'd guess).
I think the pages as grand children is helpful for now as keeping it
in the page tree has a certain poetry
Hi,
I was looking for rails cms and finally, radiant is the one I want.
However I ride w3m in text mode (a11y background) and because of
javascript, I can't pass the demo test...
Is it possible to turn off javascript in the view layer ?
if yes? then users += 1 end
Thanks !
--
Boris Daix
Boris,
In order to get unobtrusive Javascript and full plain-text compatibility,
we would have to change a lot of the code -- maybe this can be a 1.0 goal.
Luckily JS is only required in the admin interface, so you might be able to
enable JS just for that domain/url in your browser.
Sean
On
There's been so much discussion about mental, I thought it deserved a 'How
To', so here you go:
http://radiantcms.org/blog/2007/01/23/how-to-getting-mental/
I hope this answers a lot of questions!
Sean
___
Radiant mailing list
Post:
Hi Sean,
Just noticed on the blog post that it states Radiant is dependant on edge
rails under the cons section. Is this still the case, or are the core team
looking to stabilise it on Rails 1.2 now that it's been released?
Kev
On 1/23/07, Sean Cribbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's been
We had a discussion about this. The current plan is to keep on the latest
until Radiant is ready to release, then either freeze/external to the latest
stable version or specify the gem version in environment.rb. And by Edge
Rails, I mean that we are currently using the 1-2-prerelease branch.
On 1/23/07, Sean Cribbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luckily JS is only required in the admin interface, so you might be able
to enable JS just for that domain/url in your browser.
He cannot. It is a text browser not supporting JS
___
Radiant mailing
Boris wrote:
I was looking for rails cms and finally, radiant is the one I want.
However I ride w3m in text mode (a11y background) and because of
javascript, I can't pass the demo test...
The Radiant admin will probably always require Javascript.
--
John Long
http://wiseheartdesign.com
I don't see any. It's good enough for most cases, I believe.
The unmentioned alternative, of course, is memcached. It would
take minimal changes to the code, probably a single line in
environment.rb , since ResponseCache piggy-backs on the Rails caching
mechanism.
Well then can we make Apache serve everything? Why not have the options
to make Radiant generate a full directory of HTML files. A possible way
to support having select pieces of the site be dynamic is to use Apache
server side includes to make calls back to Radiant for specific pieces.
John + Core,
Is there a better Wiki we can move to? I can't even figure out how to
create a new page. Does one need privileges and how does one get them?
I'd really like to post some stuff on there (like the RSS Reader
extesion).
Thanks,
BJ Clark
___
There's a register link just under the search button. You need to
register before you can modify the wiki or post tickets.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BJ Clark
Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 4:52 PM
To:
John W. Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The Radiant admin will probably always require Javascript.
So I will probably never be able to use radiant :-(
Requiring JS breaks overall radiant accessibility. Isn't JS mostly
used to shrink the content tree ? This would be great to relax this,
19 matches
Mail list logo
