On 3 December 2021 at 12:06, Kevin Ushey wrote:
| I'm a fan. I think we could just have a single header RcppLite.h which
| would turn off the "heaviest" pieces of Rcpp; that is, modules + sugar
| + (maybe?) RTTI.
Yep. That's where I started. I may make that a PR then.
But I also still lean to
I'm a fan. I think we could just have a single header RcppLite.h which
would turn off the "heaviest" pieces of Rcpp; that is, modules + sugar
+ (maybe?) RTTI.
Or, we could allow for #define RCPP_LEAN_AND_MEAN ... ;-)
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 10:57 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 3 December
On 3 December 2021 at 19:47, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
| Mmmh, no strong opinions here. I think it doesn't matter much whether
| it's an include or a define. What matters most is whether this is
| discoverable and the user understands what it does.
That was my motivation -- by pointing to such a
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 19:27, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 3 December 2021 at 17:03, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> | On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 15:44, Víthor Rosa wrote:
> | >
> | > Thank you for your response. Adding my functions to an R package and
> changing the Makevars file as suggested reduced the
On 3 December 2021 at 17:03, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
| On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 15:44, Víthor Rosa wrote:
| >
| > Thank you for your response. Adding my functions to an R package and
changing the Makevars file as suggested reduced the runtime by half. Excited
for Rcpp 1.0.8! :)
|
| Excellent! Glad it
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 15:44, Víthor Rosa wrote:
>
> Hi Iñaki and Dirk,
>
> Thank you for your response. Adding my functions to an R package and changing
> the Makevars file as suggested reduced the runtime by half. Excited for Rcpp
> 1.0.8! :)
Excellent! Glad it helped.
Iñaki
>
> Best,
>
>
Hi Iñaki and Dirk,
Thank you for your response. Adding my functions to an R package and
changing the Makevars file as suggested reduced the runtime by half.
Excited for Rcpp 1.0.8! :)
Best,
Em qui., 2 de dez. de 2021 às 18:22, Dirk Eddelbuettel
escreveu:
>
> On 2 December 2021 at 17:48, Iñaki
On 2 December 2021 at 17:48, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
| My simulation package makes heavy use of calls to R user functions from a
| C++ simulation loop, and therefore greatly benefits from this feature too,
| which I think we should promote to default.
I agree and believe I looked into it once before
Hi Víthor,
My simulation package makes heavy use of calls to R user functions from a
C++ simulation loop, and therefore greatly benefits from this feature too,
which I think we should promote to default. Meanwhile, take a look at this
Makevars file to see how to activate it:
