On 8/22/07, João Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes you did,
Adobe cares too much about backward compatibility so they won't never
discontinue current codecs. Also, for your information, sorenson will
be the only codec available for encoding from within Flash Player and they
Hi guys, back from holidays ;)
I agree with John on this one, we just must wait and see which is Adobe's
move.
I wonder what will they do to forbid third party servers to inject h264
content into flash player...my bid is that they'll add a new handshake or
whatever, it won't be a matter of legal
# HTTP
http.host=0.0.0.0
http.port=5080
# RTMP
rtmp.host=0.0.0.0
rtmp.port=1935
rtmp.event_threads_core=16
rtmp.event_threads_max=32
# event threads queue: -1 unbounded, 0 direct (no queue), n bounded
queue
rtmp.event_threads_queue=-1
rtmp.event_threads_keepalive=60
Like some one (sorry to forget the name) said in this thread earlier,
Adobe is in the campaign of open source. At least, with them, Flex is no
longer high-priced during the Macromedia days and they even open sourced
it. I don't know others, for me, I started thinking the possibility of
Guys, Relax
It is unlikely that Tinic was referring to any legal means that they might
employ to prevent others from streaming h.264. This was Tinic writing. He is
not a lawyer or even a marketer. And his english is not always solid. I have
been over the legal issues a million times so I
OK, I am trying to remember if Tomcat / RED5 started to use rtmpt when I
combined
Tomcat / Apache via mod_jk
You can see rtmpt in action at http://red5.fatdot.com
This website is running the following:
RED5 - Trunk 2228
Tomcat 6.0.13
Java 1.6_2
Apache 2.2.4
PHP 5.2.3
MySQl 5.0.47
Regards,
I've installed red5-0.6.2-java5.war under tomcat.
Tomcat is under apache in a linux box.
Connecting to http://myserver/red5/ it seems to work but when I launch
the demo port tester all the connections are failed.
So if I run publisher demo I can't connect to rtmp://localhost/oflaDemo,
it says
Should be this:
# HTTP
http.host=0.0.0.0
http.port=8080
# RTMP
rtmp.host=0.0.0.0
rtmp.port=1935
rtmp.event_threads_core=16
rtmp.event_threads_max=32
# event threads queue: -1 unbounded, 0 direct (no queue), n bounded
queue
rtmp.event_threads_queue=-1
rtmp.event_threads_keepalive=60
Il giorno mer, 22/08/2007 alle 06.02 -0500, Lenny Sorey ha scritto:
OK, I am trying to remember if Tomcat / RED5 started to use rtmpt when
I combined
Tomcat / Apache via mod_jk
I also run tomcat/apache via mod_jk but it seems that rtmp doesn't work,
the only settings to modify are in
Sounds like a file permissions problem? Maybe the files aren't
accessible for the user that runs Red5?
Thijs
On Aug 17, 2007, at 9:18 AM, exlineo wrote:
Did you try to generate meta files on window to use on linux server
as a test ?
Jean-V N. Edou a écrit :
Thanks exlineo for replying.
Permission Problems maybe?
Lenny
On 8/22/07, Mauro Sanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno mer, 22/08/2007 alle 06.02 -0500, Lenny Sorey ha scritto:
OK, I am trying to remember if Tomcat / RED5 started to use rtmpt when
I combined
Tomcat / Apache via mod_jk
I also run tomcat/apache
If you can run direct from Tomcat, try the following:
http://localhost:8080/red5/demoshttp://localhost:8080/red5/demos/ofla_demo.swf
/ofla_demo.swf http://localhost:8080/red5/demos to see if you can run
the flash 8 video streaming example.
See if you can connect and see videos.
Lenny
On
Hi Max,
So, is this still the old version of Red5? How can I find out which
version of Red5 I am running?
Check the file in doc/changelog.txt for the version number. If you're
using the svn version try 'svn info' ;)
Thijs
___
Red5 mailing list
Hoi Martijn,
After that I want to start developing new material. Possible I have
to post some feature requests for it like:
- Restarting a webapp
- Statistics logging (I want to know how much data my website is
consuming via Red5)
- Live Application log
Also make sure to check the
This looks like a bug..? Create a new ticket on http://jira.red5.org
If it's not a bug I guess it would be a good enhancement to be able
to force Red5 to use AMF3 through some xml file or something?
Thijs
On Aug 17, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Dominik Willers wrote:
Dear all,
I'm new to Red5, so
Sorry I meant the /build.properties file. But it looks like there
were some changes:
# Change this var to build to a different Java version
# Defaults to current version. Valid options are 1.6, or 1.5. Note
1.4 is not supported.
java.target_version=${java.specification.version}
I think
Hi Paul,
I updated to r2238 and getting this error. Is ant retrieve still broken?
retrieve:
[javac] Compiling 433 source files to /Users/thijstriemstra/
Sites/software/red5/trunk/bin
[javac] /Users/thijstriemstra/Sites/software/red5/trunk/src/org/
Nevermind, running ant retrieve fixed it.
Thijs
On Aug 22, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Thijs Triemstra | Collab wrote:
Hi Paul,
I updated to r2238 and getting this error. Is ant retrieve still
broken?
retrieve:
[javac] Compiling 433 source files to /Users/thijstriemstra/
Since the following statement is still in the description for this update,
exactly what are we risking
and what do we do if we have problems with this trunk update?
Use at your own risk since packets may get messed up.
What is the remedy for this? How do we know if the Packets are Messed Up
: )
Hey, Hank,
I salute you.. !!!
I have been saying this to whoever started few weeks ago.
But somehow someone on the edge is trying to fuel the fire.
MC
.
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 06:13 -0400, hank williams wrote:
Guys, Relax
It is unlikely that Tinic was referring to any legal means that they
Hi Lenny,
Lenny Sorey schrieb:
Since the following statement is still in the description for this
update, exactly what are we risking
and what do we do if we have problems with this trunk update?
Use at your own risk since packets may get messed up.
What is the remedy for this? How do we
Hi Joachim,
Thanks for your response.
Checking out APPSERVER-177 now.
Thanks,
Lenny
On 8/22/07, Joachim Bauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lenny,
Lenny Sorey schrieb:
Since the following statement is still in the description for this
update, exactly what are we risking
and what do
Joachim,
Sorry for my lack of understanding.
According to APPSERVER-177 this issue was resolved.
So why do we have this disclaimer about use at your own risk statement
regarding trunk update 2231?
What am I missing here?
So this is mainly related to Shared Objects?
Is this issue related to
Hi Lenny,
Lenny Sorey schrieb:
Sorry for my lack of understanding.
According to APPSERVER-177 this issue was resolved.
So why do we have this disclaimer about use at your own risk statement
regarding trunk update 2231?
What am I missing here?
So this is mainly related to Shared
Hmm,
I tested with Victor's workaround and everything seem to work ok.
But it is nice to have an official blessing from you guys. : )
Regards,
Lenny
On 8/22/07, Joachim Bauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lenny,
Lenny Sorey schrieb:
Sorry for my lack of understanding.
According to
I'm in the middle of a war clean-up, but in the interim you can rename the
war to ROOT.war (yes uppercase matters) which would replace the current
tomcat default root war. This is kind of a hack but should allow red5 to
work as you would expect; otherwise you have to try various url schemes and
Im adding one of mina jmx classes to the -library.check target so others
wont run into this issue in the future.
Paul
On 8/22/07, Thijs Triemstra | Collab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevermind, running ant retrieve fixed it.
Thijs
On Aug 22, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Thijs Triemstra | Collab wrote:
Very simple, goal in two steps :
1. Put your flv video on the 'streams' folder in red5
(tomcat/webapps/red5/streams)
2. Connect a flash flv player : rtmp://my-domain/oflaDemo/my-video.flv
For the JW player, http://www.jeroenwijering.com/ you can define
streams on the playlist :
titleThe
Hello All,
I just updated to trunk 2333 for the following platform:
I cannot successfully connect to any of my RED5 apps.
I had to drop back to Trunk 2228 in order for my apps to work again:
Platform:
Windows 2000 Server
Tomcat 6.0.13
java 1.6_2
RED5 trunk 2333
Flash 8 and Flex 2 apps
Not
Can someone tell me where to change the size of the video that will be
recorded?
I have been playing with the SimpleRecorder and have change the camera to
400 X 300.
Yet when I check the size width and height of the recorded flv it always
shows
352 X 264..
Where can I change this default size
Keep in mind that the Flash player will auto-magically re-size the
recorded video to best match what the camera is giving it. I haven't
found a way to force it to do a specific size.
Lenny Sorey wrote:
Can someone tell me where to change the size of the video that will be
recorded?
I
Bill,
Thanks for your response.
I am going to play around with it some more to see
what I can do.
I was afraid that was going to be the answer.
Regards,
Lenny
On 8/22/07, Sales Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind that the Flash player will auto-magically re-size the
Are you using the WAR version?
On 8/22/07, Lenny Sorey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I just updated to trunk 2333 for the following platform:
I cannot successfully connect to any of my RED5 apps.
I had to drop back to Trunk 2228 in order for my apps to work again:
Platform:
Yep,
sure am.
Lenny
On 8/22/07, Mondain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you using the WAR version?
On 8/22/07, Lenny Sorey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I just updated to trunk 2333 for the following platform:
I cannot successfully connect to any of my RED5 apps.
I had
OK Np, it loaded as a checkout in eclipse fine. I'll move it over to the
server tommorow.
Steven Gong wrote:
Dan,
The Edge server connects the Origin via TCP socket (default port is 9035).
Glad to see that you can setup a test server for this. Thanks. :-)
On 8/21/07, * Dan Rossi* [EMAIL
Must be my day to ask questions.
Can anyone tell me why an flv recorded with a webcam always
appears to the right and off center in John Grdens's Flex FLVPlayer.
It doesn't matter what size I can get get the final flv to, it always
appears
to the right and off center. then when you try to expand
You are limited to the resolution your camera/webcam can handle.
Some webcams do 160x120, 320x200 320x240 and that's it.
Some can do 352x288, 640x480 or even 800x600.
This totally depends on the driver (in case of a capturecard/external
videosource) or on the webcam.
Try to use the native FPS of
Thanks Walter,
I will give it a try and let you know how it goes.
Regards,
Lenny
On 8/22/07, Walter Tak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are limited to the resolution your camera/webcam can handle.
Some webcams do 160x120, 320x200 320x240 and that's it.
Some can do 352x288, 640x480 or even
Right, if you choose a width that your camera can handle, you should have no
problems. When you choose a setting higher than what the camera can handle,
it automagically chooses the highest you can do.
On 8/22/07, Lenny Sorey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Walter,
I will give it a try and
you're probably using a width and height that isn't the default in John's
player. I'm not sure he does the checking for that and so your origin is
probably not where it should be for the size of your video. Just a guess.
On 8/22/07, Lenny Sorey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must be my day to ask
Hi Dominick,
The funny thing about this problem is none of he trailer videos have any
problem.
Only the recorded videos. They all appear down in the right section of the
screen,while
a one of the trailer videos that is the same size appears correctly
centered. I did notice
that it looked like
Here's a code snippet to check the available modes for your cam.
fps=15; //Try other values
cam = Camera.get();
for (w=100;w1000;w=w+20){
for (h=100;h1000;h=h+20){
cam.setMode(w,h,fps);
if ((w + x + h)==(cam.width + x + cam.height)){
trace(cam.width + x + cam.height + @ + cam.fps);
}
}
I have a Red5 server set up on Fedora Core with port 80 set up for rtmpt in
red5.properties .
My issue comes from trying to connect over rtmpt
Whenever I use rtmpt://subdomain.server.com/myapp the connection succeeds
aand my chat app works just fine
Whenever I use
Hello,
RTMPT is on port 8088, not 80. Look at /conf/red5.properties.
-Luke
On Aug 22, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Naicu Octavian wrote:
I have a Red5 server set up on Fedora Core with port 80 set up for
rtmpt in red5.properties .
My issue comes from trying to connect over rtmpt
Whenever I use
On 8/21/07, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I am not clear what name you are saying red5 comes close to infringing.
2. If it does, there are no damages without notice. You cannot sue if you
ask someone to change the name and they do. Its not like copyright
infringement where any
45 matches
Mail list logo
