Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-20

2023-04-07 Thread Jasdip Singh
From: Mario Loffredo Date: Friday, April 7, 2023 at 1:28 PM To: Jasdip Singh , "Hollenbeck, Scott" , Andy Newton Cc: "regext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-20 Il 07/04/2023 18:56, Jasdip Singh ha scritto: On 4/5/23, 12:56 PM, "Mario Loffredo"

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-20

2023-04-07 Thread Mario Loffredo
Il 07/04/2023 18:56, Jasdip Singh ha scritto: On 4/5/23, 12:56 PM, "Mario Loffredo" mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>> wrote: [SAH] Nit: as alluded to by Jasdip above, RFC 7231 has been obsoleted by RFC 9110. The 501 text is 9110 is consistent with 7231, but I don’t think it’s limited to

Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-20

2023-04-07 Thread Jasdip Singh
On 4/5/23, 12:56 PM, "Mario Loffredo" mailto:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>> wrote: >> [SAH] Nit: as alluded to by Jasdip above, RFC 7231 has been >> obsoleted by RFC 9110. >> >> The 501 text is 9110 is consistent with 7231, but I don’t think >> it’s limited to an

Re: [regext] [EXTERNAL] Re: jCard to JSContact transition

2023-04-07 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Andy, Il 06/04/2023 16:36, Andrew Newton ha scritto: On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:56 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: [ML] Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for this. Really there are some documents under discussion that would be eventually affected. But I wonder where it's stated that