Hi.
Agree with James’ input -- not violating the JSContact spec for the mandatory
uid, and using the redaction-by-replacement method. Using a nil UUID as a
replacement string for uid looks elegant.
Thanks,
Jasdip
From: regext on behalf of "Gould, James"
Date: Thursday, April 20, 2023 at
Mario,
I agree if you can’t remove the mandatory UID field to comply with the
JSContact specification and are forced to use a literal value (placeholder
text) than the Redaction by Replacement Value Method is the best route to go
for redaction, since it explicitly signals the use of
Hi all,
willing to finalize the discussion about how to redact JSContact uid in
RDAP, I first would like to thank everyone who has provided feedback.
Really appreciated it.
SInce it seems to me that no option has collected the largest consensus,
I would like to make a new proposal that
