Re: [regext] Thoughts on the fundamental premise of JSContact

2023-06-09 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Andy, please find my comments below. Il 09/06/2023 17:41, Andrew Newton ha scritto: On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:03 AM Jasdip Singh wrote: Hello Mario, Your answer made my day! :) I'm still LOL about your "it wouldn't be short-sighted but completely blind" point. Yah, good to think this

Re: [regext] Thoughts on the fundamental premise of JSContact

2023-06-09 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Jasdip, happy to have made your day. Unfortunately the rules of .it firewall forbid the access to that web page :-( The leading principle in JSContact design has always been to make it as comprehensive and extensible as possible. Maybe this may have resulted in more complexity now but

Re: [regext] Thoughts on the fundamental premise of JSContact

2023-06-09 Thread Andrew Newton
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:03 AM Jasdip Singh wrote: > > Hello Mario, > > Your answer made my day! :) I'm still LOL about your "it wouldn't be > short-sighted but completely blind" point. Yah, good to think this through > before we as a WG take the next step. I recall one of the laws of

Re: [regext] Thoughts on the fundamental premise of JSContact

2023-06-09 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hello Mario, Your answer made my day! :) I'm still LOL about your "it wouldn't be short-sighted but completely blind" point. Yah, good to think this through before we as a WG take the next step. I recall one of the laws of simplicity [1]: law 9 which says that some things can never be made

Re: [regext] Thoughts on the fundamental premise of JSContact

2023-06-09 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Jasdip, Il 08/06/2023 15:39, Jasdip Singh ha scritto: True, we could define an entity object class that serves the DNR and RIR purposes with a simpler JSON, just like we chose to define domain, IP network, and autonomous system number object classes that are specific to these registries'