[regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-loffredo-regext-epp-over-http-03.txt

2024-02-20 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi all, just submitted a new version of draft-loffredo-regext-epp-over-http. Here in the following the most relevant updates: 1. Has been made fully compliant with RFC 5730 2. Aligns with the structure and makeup of EPP over TCP (EoT) in RFC 5734 3. Fully pluggable transport for EPP with EoT

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: Adding the DNS root to the bootstrap file

2024-02-20 Thread James Mitchell
Hi Marc, I’ll share a version of the bootstrap file in a few weeks, once the host is globally reachable. Thanks, James From: Marc Blanchet Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 6:40 AM To: James Mitchell Cc: "regext@ietf.org" Subject: [Ext] Re: [regext] Adding the DNS root to the bootstrap

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-00.txt

2024-02-20 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-00.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF. Title: Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Authors: Scott

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

2024-02-20 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
From: regext On Behalf Of Jasdip Singh Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:51 PM To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; a...@hxr.us Cc: i...@antoin.nl; mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it; regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search Caution: This email originated

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

2024-02-20 Thread Jasdip Singh
Hello Andy, Scott, Let’s take a specific example from the RIR search draft (a specification with multiple extension identifiers defined) to test-drive these options. Say, an IP network search response: { "rdapConformance": [ "rdap_level_0", "rirSearch1",

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

2024-02-20 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
Andy, I agree that that's an incorrect interpretation. Content is part of the response, too, and as such it has to be included when the response is constructed/formed/assembled/whatever. Scott > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Newton (andy) > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:23

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

2024-02-20 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
"construction of the response" can be interpreted strictly to mean only the JSON structure of the response. IMHO, that is an incorrect interpretation nor does it track with RDAP as it is used because profile extensions such as the ICANN and NRO extensions also dictate content not just structure.

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

2024-02-20 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
I don’t understand the confusion regarding the text in 9083. It might not include BCP 14 key words, but I believe the intention is clear. Looking at the two sentences: “A response to a "help" request will include identifiers for all of the specifications supported by the server.” *will

Re: [regext] Adding the DNS root to the bootstrap file

2024-02-20 Thread Marc Blanchet
> Le 19 févr. 2024 à 20:28, James Mitchell a écrit : > > Hi all, > > IANA is planning to add the DNS root to the RDAP DNS bootstrap file. We do > not yet have a date for this change and are currently looking to understand > potential impact to RDAP clients. > Hi James, Thanks for