Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-25 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Amanda, thanks a lot for your quick reply. You're right. I can remove that sentence. Thanks a lot, Mario Il 25/08/2023 00:17, Amanda Baber ha scritto: Hi Mario, I see that the new text is "References are not limited only to RFCs but can also locate document published outside of the RFC

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Amanda Baber
Hi Mario, I see that the new text is "References are not limited only to RFCs but can also locate document published outside of the RFC path, including informal documentation." For IANA's purposes, this sentence isn't necessary, as the Specification Required policy was specifically meant to

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Amanda, Il 23/08/2023 19:51, Amanda Baber ha scritto: Regarding the use of a brief description in the registry itself as the "Specification" in "Specification Required": I missed it this time, but we ran into this same question with draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-21, and FWIW, Barry Leiba

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-23 Thread Amanda Baber
Regarding the use of a brief description in the registry itself as the "Specification" in "Specification Required": I missed it this time, but we ran into this same question with draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-21, and FWIW, Barry Leiba recommended to the author that the registration procedure be