David,
The IANA registrations as listed in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24 look good to me.
-andy
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 6:41 PM David Dong via RT
wrote:
>
> Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG),
>
> As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review
> the
Il 17/08/2023 13:19, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 4:43 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
Hi Andy,
could it work for you and Scott if I changed the text in Section 12.2.1 as in
the following ?
OLD
Creators of either new RDAP reverse searches or new mappings for
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 4:43 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> could it work for you and Scott if I changed the text in Section 12.2.1 as in
> the following ?
>
> OLD
>
>Creators of either new RDAP reverse searches or new mappings for
>registered reverse searches SHOULD NOT
Hi Andy,
could it work for you and Scott if I changed the text in Section 12.2.1
as in the following ?
OLD
Creators of either new RDAP reverse searches or new mappings for
registered reverse searches SHOULD NOT replicate functionality
already available by way of other documents
Thanks Mario. I understand the intent and had assumed that multiple
mappings were allowed.
While Scott and I understand, do we feel that future DE's might need
better guidance? Is the term "collisions" clear enough for a future DE
that may not have the benefit of having read this email thread?
Hi Andy,
please find my comments inline.
Il 11/08/2023 14:16, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
I wish I had asked this during the WG discussion, but I do have a question.
Section 12.2.1 paragraph 3 states:
"The designated expert should prevent collisions and confirm that
suitable documentation, as
Dear Authors/Chairs/ADs,
Please see below for a question from one of the experts.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
--
I wish I had asked this during the WG discussion, but I do have a question.
Section 12.2.1 paragraph 3 states:
"The designated expert should prevent
I wish I had asked this during the WG discussion, but I do have a question.
Section 12.2.1 paragraph 3 states:
"The designated expert should prevent collisions and confirm that
suitable documentation, as described in Section 4.6 of [RFC8126], is
available to ensure interoperability. References
Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review the
proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-23 for us?
Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/
The due date is
