Re: [regext] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS)

2023-08-25 Thread John Scudder
Sounds good, Mario. I’ll be glad to clear when you’ve published version 25 with the update. Thanks, —John > On Aug 24, 2023, at 6:29 AM, Mario Loffredo wrote: > > Hi John, > > thanks a lot for your review. > > Please find my comments below. > > Il 22/08/2023 22:55, John Scudder via

Re: [regext] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS)

2023-08-24 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:33 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: > > It looks as though draft-ietf-jsonpath-base should be a Normative > reference. In > > fact, this is explicitly mentioned in the shepherd writeup (thank you!): > > > > > 15. Should any informative references be normative or >

Re: [regext] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi John, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments below. Il 22/08/2023 22:55, John Scudder via Datatracker ha scritto: John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line

[regext] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS)

2023-08-22 Thread John Scudder via Datatracker
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please