I support publication, so +1.
Upon a re-review of -08, and I have the following nit feedback:
Section 1.2.1.2 “Supported DNS record types”
"This eliminates the need to update this document in the event that new DNS
records that exist above a zone cut (Section 7 of [RFC9499]) see is
+1
Mario
Il 29/04/2024 16:27, James Galvin ha scritto:
The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for
submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed Standard:
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values
I've reviewed the draft again. I think it's ready modulo one minor nit:
Section 1.1: The text currently says "in this document are to be interpreted as
described in [RFC2119]". Current convention is to say "in this document are to
be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when,
The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for
submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed Standard:
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for DNS Time-To-Live (TTL) values
