Hi all!
When I applied the new 01-iput-deadlock-fix from
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending/01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff
on 2.4.21-pre3 - together with Chris Masons data-logging patches - I
saw that the main data-logging patch didn't apply without rejects. This
also affects
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: Hottest Money Maker on the Internet Hottest Money Maker
on the
Am Freitag, 24. Januar 2003 08:50 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:18:44AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
You need highmem if you want more than 980M. People usually refer to
1G, and if you don't mind wasting 20M then that's near enough.
Mmh. So I wasn't really
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:00:19PM +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
higmem4GB / highmem64GB with pae or does it produce more overhead that
you mention below?
You get no advantage of course.
But lots of overhead. Rumours have it that 256M systems with highmem
enabled kernels (default
Am Freitag, 24. Januar 2003 18:03 schrieb Oleg Drokin:
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:00:19PM +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
higmem4GB / highmem64GB with pae or does it produce more overhead
that you mention below?
You get no advantage of course.
But lots of overhead. Rumours
Dear reiserfs developers,
here's an update on the trouble I had lately (the second disk crash):
the culprit was IDE DMA!
Here's the story:
* I installed more RAM, and it failed, so I upgrade the BIOS to see it
(machine was dead after I upgraded the BIOS, until I was told to also
short the
Hi everyone,
Hi Oleg!
I'm trying to get quotas working on 2.4.20.
So far they seem to work ok with the dec-3-2002 patches from:
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20/
with CONFIG_QFMT_V2.
However the patch from jan-22-2003 in:
