On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:12:34 +0200
"ni nhar" wrote:
> And maybe nothing is gained from a repnonfree system compared to a
> lineage os system.
A way to deal with it would be to work with various upstream, which
include LineageOS and GNU/Linux to push our implementations there.
For instance if
> And maybe nothing is gained
> from a repnonfree system compared to a lineage os system.
Exactly.
> Wrongly I had the
> impression that replicant search for unwanted monitoring pieces of software
> and remove it should they find something.
Replicant searches for all non-free software and
> https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/
I know replicant comes from lineage os. And maybe nothing is gained
from a repnonfree system compared to a lineage os system. Wrongly I had the
impression that replicant search for unwanted monitoring pieces of software
and remove it should they find
> people that think that laptops made by Purism are
> fully free software which isn't the case.
purism is not an adequate example. I believe purism intentionally have
misinformed people in order to have them think their products
run on free software.
> If people also think that
> Ubuntu,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:08:18 +0300
"ni nhar" wrote:
> My reasoning is, it is better if people have a lineage os phone than
> an iphone or android phone.
> It is better if people have a replicant phone than a lineage os
> phone.
> It is better if people have a non free software replicant phone
ni nhar, 19/10/19 13:08:
Can you make a non free version of replicant and
still call it replicant?
No.
Can
you make a non free version of replicant and call
it something else?
Yes.
Have you checked whether some of the recent "distributions" for phones
fit your your requirements?
As
This is not about getting any of you to put non
free software into replicant. And
if my suggestions and questions are violating
rules for this email list
then discard this email.
I have several times said, it is good we have
replicant. But the phones which
are replicant compatible makes replicant
