Re: Gitlab C2

2021-11-05 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > The statement reads: > "This is a result of moving to a new vendor. In

Re: Gitlab C2

2021-11-05 Thread bill-auger
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:07:04 -0400 bill-auger wrote: > just as with github C2 previously i suppose we may as well ask Pedram to confirm github's recent C2 change (now passes C2) - is github.com accessible from iran Pedram, as the work-group recently concluded?

Re: Gitlab C2

2021-11-05 Thread bill-auger
that twitter post touches the caveat discussed a few months ago, WRT a possible clarification of C2 (that the block is voluntary): from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00069.html On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:19:17 -0400 Richard wrote: > > that reads to me like it

Re: Gitlab C2

2021-11-05 Thread Marcos Marado
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 03:56 Richard Stallman wrote: > > That the gitlab.com web site blocks connections from Iran. > > What does gitlab.com say its policy is > towards use by Iranians in Iran? That is important, too. > I have seen an "official" statement from Gitlab specifically about Iran,