reprotest_0.7.27_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:45:44 -0700 Source: reprotest Architecture: source Version: 0.7.27 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

Bug#1034311: reprotest: make it easier to compare against an existing build (eg from ftp.d.o)

On 2024-03-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2023-04-12, Holger Levsen wrote: >> i guess reprotest maybe should grow an option to do >> --control-build /path/to/packages/ >> --vary=build_path=/use/this/build/path ... >>to make it easier to use reprotest to

Processing of reprotest_0.7.27_source.changes

reprotest_0.7.27_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: reprotest_0.7.27.dsc reprotest_0.7.27.tar.xz reprotest_0.7.27_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#847805: reprotest: document/support simple reproducibility test with sbuild

On 2016-12-11, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 03:12:57PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >> I have sbuild properly set up on my machine, and I want to use it to >> test package reproducibility. Something like this, where PWD is an >> unpacked source package: >> >> 1) sbuild >> 2)

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

* Holger Levsen [2024-04-11 12:54]: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > [...] > > Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email. > [...] > > Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue. > > awesome, thank you both! The promised cpython

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-03/ .. and also consider retweeting:

Bug#1068809: dh-buildinfo: consider deprecating and removing the package

Package: dh-buildinfo Version: 0.11+nmu3 X-Debbugs-Cc: hol...@debian.org Hi, dh-buildinfo much predates the reproducible builds effort and the .buildinfo file and probably laid ground to it. I am now raising the question whether it is time to get rid of dh-buildinfo in Debian. Essentially I am

Re: Bug#1068483: Bug#882511: dpkg-buildpackage: should allow caller to force inclusion of source in buildinfo

Hi! On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 15:22:45 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-04-09, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I've now finished the change I had in that branch, which implements > > support so that dpkg-buildpackage can be passed a .dsc or a source-dir, > > and in the former will first extract it,

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: [...] > Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email. [...] > Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue. awesome, thank you both! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

tags 1068705 + pending thanks Fay Stegerman wrote: > The attached patch avoids the crash in this case, FWIW. […] Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email. > I would still recommend catching the error for other cases. Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue.

Processed: Re: Bug#1068705: diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1068705 + pending Bug #1068705 [diffoscope] diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on unstable but not bullseye Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1068705: