Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-10 Thread Felix C. Stegerman
Hi! * Nilesh Patra [2021-06-10 18:36]: > Many thanks for your patches, I applies both of them and reprotest CI goes > green now![1] \o/ > Super thanks for your help! > > I'll file a bug report now > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/brian/-/jobs/1694238 \o/ I already submitted the

Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-10 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Felix, On 6/10/21 8:32 PM, Felix C. Stegerman wrote: > Hi! > > * "Felix C. Stegerman" [2021-06-10 16:55]: >> * Nilesh Patra [2021-06-07 21:16]: >>> * Only _some_ files in the documentation it vendors has stuff (like tags, >>> examples, links) in random order across different builds. >>> By

Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-10 Thread Felix C. Stegerman
Hi! * "Felix C. Stegerman" [2021-06-10 16:55]: > * Nilesh Patra [2021-06-07 21:16]: > > * Only _some_ files in the documentation it vendors has stuff (like tags, > > examples, links) in random order across different builds. > > By the looks of it, it seems this randomness is due to the way

Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-10 Thread Felix C. Stegerman
Hi! * Nilesh Patra [2021-06-07 21:16]: > * Only _some_ files in the documentation it vendors has stuff (like tags, > examples, links) in random order across different builds. > By the looks of it, it seems this randomness is due to the way data is being > inserted into files with the

Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-08 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-06-08, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 6/8/21 3:40 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2021-06-08, Nilesh Patra wrote: >>> I was trying to make "brian" package reproducible. To my understanding it >>> has two problems: >>> * Only _some_ files in the documentation it vendors has stuff (like tags,

Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 04:09:26PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi Vagrant, > > On 6/8/21 3:40 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > On 2021-06-08, Nilesh Patra wrote: > >> I was trying to make "brian" package reproducible. To my understanding it > >> has two problems: > >> > >> * use

Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-08 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Vagrant, On 6/8/21 3:40 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2021-06-08, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> I was trying to make "brian" package reproducible. To my understanding it >> has two problems: >> >> * use datetime.date.today() and similar stuff for build documentation - I >> suppose I fixed these

Re: [Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-06-08, Nilesh Patra wrote: > I was trying to make "brian" package reproducible. To my understanding it has > two problems: > > * use datetime.date.today() and similar stuff for build documentation - I > suppose I fixed these with using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Your fixes look reasonable; just

[Request for help] Making brian reproducible

2021-06-07 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, I was trying to make "brian" package reproducible. To my understanding it has two problems: * use datetime.date.today() and similar stuff for build documentation - I suppose I fixed these with using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH * Only _some_ files in the documentation it vendors has stuff (like