And another one!
wbd0-armhf-rb.debian.net:
Wandboard-Dual, imx6 dual-core, 1GB ram, ~60GB USB2 SATA spinning disk
ssh port: 2223
ssh fingerprints:
256 d9:50:c6:3b:f8:1d:38:ac:97:ea:62:ea:37:cd:98:ed
/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key.pub (ECDSA)
2048 48:4c:9c:b4:b7:41:76:6f:36:0d:eb:b5:83:bf:66:4c
Source: pbuilder
Version: 0.219
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that pbuilder could not be
Your mail to 'pkg-apparmor-team' with the subject
reproducible.debian.net status changes for apparmor
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has implicit destination
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you
B1;2802;0cOn Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:41:51AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > So, I don't think that this patch would really be "beneficial to our
> > project", as it will only serve to artificially "improve" the statistics.
>
> Out of interest, would you extend this
Santiago Vila:
> I have very mixed feelings about this kind of patches.
>
> I fear that by modifying gcc to hide the improper usage of __DATE__
> and __TIME__, we could be removing an incentive for maintainers and
> authors to write software which is truly reproducible, i.e. we run
> the risk of
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:44:59PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Well, I still would like to push to add `-Wdate-time` to our default set
> of CFLAGS. Even with Dhole's patch, developpers would see the warning
> and ask themselves if it's the right thing to do.
Good that.
We are now down to 2
Source: wsjt
Version: 9.7.r3639+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertag: ftbfs
Hi wsjt maintainer,
Your package currently fails to build in the reproducible build env due
to it passing
