[Reproducible-builds] Processed: Re: Bug#808003: diffoscope: Comparing directories shouldn't care about file order

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #808003 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: Comparing directories shouldn't care about file order Added tag(s) pending. -- 808003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808003 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

[Reproducible-builds] Processed: Re: Bug#808199: diffoscope: Weird line numbering in diff output

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + pending Bug #808199 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: Weird line numbering in diff output Added tag(s) pending. -- 808199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808199 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of diffoscope_44_amd64.changes

diffoscope_44_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: diffoscope_44.dsc diffoscope_44.tar.xz debbindiff_44_all.deb diffoscope_44_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of diffoscope_44_amd64.changes

diffoscope_44_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_44.dsc diffoscope_44.tar.xz debbindiff_44_all.deb diffoscope_44_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[Reproducible-builds] diffoscope_44_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:42:20 + Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope debbindiff Architecture: source all Version: 44 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808103: marked as done (diffoscope: Truncated symbols in ELF diffs)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:54:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808103: fixed in diffoscope 44 has caused the Debian Bug report #808103, regarding diffoscope: Truncated symbols in ELF diffs to be marked as done. This means that you

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808002: marked as done (diffoscope: Add support for Mozilla-optimized ZIPs)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:54:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808002: fixed in diffoscope 44 has caused the Debian Bug report #808002, regarding diffoscope: Add support for Mozilla-optimized ZIPs to be marked as done. This means that

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808199: marked as done (diffoscope: Weird line numbering in diff output)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:54:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808199: fixed in diffoscope 44 has caused the Debian Bug report #808199, regarding diffoscope: Weird line numbering in diff output to be marked as done. This means that

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808003: marked as done (diffoscope: Comparing directories shouldn't care about file order)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:54:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808003: fixed in diffoscope 44 has caused the Debian Bug report #808003, regarding diffoscope: Comparing directories shouldn't care about file order to be marked as done.

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#808121: marked as done (diffoscope: HTML output is bloated)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:54:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808121: fixed in diffoscope 44 has caused the Debian Bug report #808121, regarding diffoscope: HTML output is bloated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

[Reproducible-builds] Patch for build nodes pools

I've had this idea that we could make more efficient use of the nodes by grouping them into pools... This would hopefully balance out the load on the nodes (most of the armhf nodes CPUs are idle roughly 25% of the time) a little better. Perhaps more importantly, it should be much more resilient

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Patch for build nodes pools

Hi Vagrant, On Samstag, 19. Dezember 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Patch below! No idea if it works, given that I don't have a spare > jenkins.debian.net or build network to test on, but hopefully it > demonstrates the idea, and is mostly there. as discussed on irc: thanks for your work on