БИОНОРМ подпомага функциите на стомашно-чревния тракт

Инфекциозна диария, диария в следствие прием на антибиотици, газове и спазми, синдром на раздразненото черво, вече имат своят алтернатива.БИОНОРМ подпомага функциите на стомашно-чревния тракт, допринася за нормализиране при стомашно-чревни неразположения, съпроводени с дискомфорт и чести

Bug#851588: marked as done (diffoscope: skip tests if binutils can't handle the object file format)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2017 01:03:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#851588: fixed in diffoscope 69 has caused the Debian Bug report #851588, regarding diffoscope: skip tests if binutils can't handle the object file format to be marked as

diffoscope_69_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:33:54 +1100 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Architecture: source Version: 69 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks

Processing of diffoscope_69_amd64.changes

diffoscope_69_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_69.dsc diffoscope_69.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Re: What do we really mean by "reproducible"?

Hi Santiago, I think you are confusing repeatable builds with reproducible builds. When we talk about reproducible builds, we mean what we documented at https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/definition/ to quote from there: "A build is reproducible if given the same source code, build environment

Re: ftbfs_due_to_semaphore_setup for qtwebengine on abel.d.o

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:53:10PM +0100, Sandro Knauß wrote: > I had seen the python semaphore problem first only at reproducible- > builds.org[0]. And I thought, that is a problem of their setup, but now I > also > get this error on abel.d.o (armhf porterbox). It is mentioned at [1], that it

ftbfs_due_to_semaphore_setup for qtwebengine on abel.d.o

Hey, I had seen the python semaphore problem first only at reproducible- builds.org[0]. And I thought, that is a problem of their setup, but now I also get this error on abel.d.o (armhf porterbox). It is mentioned at [1], that it might be a problem of permissions for /dev/shm. Just one side

Re: What do we really mean by "reproducible"?

Santiago Vila: > Greetings. > > Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, I'd > like to be sure that there is a consensus. > > What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like A or more like B? > > A. Every time the package is attempted to build, the build

Re: What do we really mean by "reproducible"?

On 2017-01-16, Santiago Vila wrote: > Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, I'd > like to be sure that there is a consensus. > > What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like A or more like B? I don't know if you're aware of the recently created:

Bug#851588: diffoscope: skip tests if binutils can't handle the object file format

Mattia Rizzolo wrote on Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 18:06:48 +0100: > So, I finally managed to look into the tests failures were have been > seeing in ubuntu's autopkgtest in armhf (and probably also ppc64el and > s390x, but I didn't test for that). > As supposed, the reason is that we're trying to

Bug#851588: diffoscope: skip tests if binutils can't handle the object file format

source: diffoscope version: 68 tags: patch So, I finally managed to look into the tests failures were have been seeing in ubuntu's autopkgtest in armhf (and probably also ppc64el and s390x, but I didn't test for that). As supposed, the reason is that we're trying to disassemble x86-64 binaries,

Re: What do we really mean by "reproducible"?

On 2017-01-16 11:26, Santiago Vila wrote: Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, I'd like to be sure that there is a consensus. What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like A or more like B? A. Every time the package is attempted to build, the build

Re: What do we really mean by "reproducible"?

On 2017-01-16 14:28, Santiago Vila wrote: On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:19:44PM +, Paul Sherwood wrote: On 2017-01-16 11:26, Santiago Vila wrote: > Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, > I'd > like to be sure that there is a consensus. > > What's the

Re: What do we really mean by "reproducible"?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:19:44PM +, Paul Sherwood wrote: > On 2017-01-16 11:26, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, > > I'd > > like to be sure that there is a consensus. > > > > What's the definition of reproducible? It is more

What do we really mean by "reproducible"?

Greetings. Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, I'd like to be sure that there is a consensus. What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like A or more like B? A. Every time the package is attempted to build, the build succeeds, and the same .deb are

Промени в данъчно - осигурителното законодателство от 1 януари 2017 г

На 23 ноември 2016 г., Народното събрание прие на второ четене промени в материалните данъчни закони с приетия Закон за изменение и допълнение на Закона за акцизите. Ако не сте се записали за участие в предстоящото ни обучение, Ви уведомяваме, че наближава крайният срок да се включите: