Hi all,
As requested by bmwiedemann, we now have a canonical location for our
source releases:
http://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/releases/
I've added documentation to these projects with instructions on how to
upload here, including how to GPG sign the tarball.
Regards,
--
,''`.
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for week 92's blog post:
Published! Many thanks all. :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Some Debian package upgrades are corrupting
rsync "quick check" backups
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <148578965254.16460.821466934538220169@localhost>
On 2017-01-30 16:20, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Holger Levsen (2017-01-30 14:58:33)
> > On
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I have no time for this, but please add something reporting about the
> recent changes that happened in dpkg
Done; thanks for the suggestion!
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 08:11:57PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/92/
>
> Feel free to commit any changes directly to drafts/92.mdwn in Git:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/
>
> $ date -d 'Mon Jan 30 23:59:00 UTC
Hi,
Quoting Holger Levsen (2017-01-30 14:58:33)
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:47:45PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > > b.) if thats the case, shall we scan all packages in sid for files which
> > > have the same timestamp+filename but different checksums and ask for
> > > binNMUs of those
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:47:45PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > (the sbuild maintainer reads the above list which has been cc:ed so he
> > should be able to comment…)
>
> You were talking about buildd-tools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
yes
> You forgot to CC that one (I understood that
Hi Henrik & Holger,
sbuild maintainer here.
Quoting Holger Levsen (2017-01-30 14:25:51)
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:10:12PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > Would reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org be the correct mailing
> > > list to discuss this?
>
> the debian-buildd list or a
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:10:12PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Would reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org be the correct mailing
> > list to discuss this?
the debian-buildd list or a bug against sbuild might be more
appropriate…
(the sbuild maintainer reads the above list which has
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:01:10PM +0200, Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 23:00 +0100, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> > On Saturday, 2017-01-28 at 14:51:19 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
> > > > I highly suspect this stems
On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 23:00 +0100, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> On Saturday, 2017-01-28 at 14:51:19 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
> > > I highly suspect this stems from packages' rules files supporting
> > > reproducible builds.
>
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
