Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

2017-02-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 06:12:44PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > Ah, now I understand the output. I initially thought rbuild > was just the first build, and didn't give it too much thought > since I didn't expect diffoscope to be called there. rbuild is the first build + some output from the

strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into jessie-backports

2017-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:45:24 +0100 Source: strip-nondeterminism Binary: libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl strip-nondeterminism dh-strip-nondeterminism Architecture: source all Version: 0.031-1~bpo8+1 Distribution:

Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

2017-02-18 Thread Christian Seiler
On 02/18/2017 05:54 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 05:50:25PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Can I find that piece of information somewhere on that page? > > Yes, at the bottom of the rbuild log. Ah, now I understand the output. I initially thought rbuild was just the

Processing of strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

2017-02-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1.dsc strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl_0.031-1~bpo8+1_all.deb

Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

2017-02-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 05:50:25PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 02/18/2017 05:42 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > >> but where did the link to the diffoscope output go on the > >> website? > > Where it is always been. > > And

Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

2017-02-18 Thread Christian Seiler
On 02/18/2017 05:42 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> but where did the link to the diffoscope output go on the >> website? > Where it is always been. And I assume that because diffoscope failed there's no link there and that's why I

Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

2017-02-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > maybe this is a case of me overlooking the obvious, but where did > the link to the diffoscope output go on the website? Where it is always been. > targetcli-fb is unreproducible in testing right now (I just > noticed), and I

strip-nondeterminism 0.031-1 MIGRATED to testing

2017-02-18 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the strip-nondeterminism source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.029-2 Current version: 0.031-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

2017-02-18 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear reproducible-builds team, maybe this is a case of me overlooking the obvious, but where did the link to the diffoscope output go on the website? targetcli-fb is unreproducible in testing right now (I just noticed), and I can find the build logs + the diff of the build logs, but I can't seem

binutils/ld.bfd, -fdebug-prefix-map, FILE entries (was: Re: dietlibc; build path issue on ARM despite -fdebug-prefix-map)

2017-02-18 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi there, On 11/05/2016 12:09 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Christian Seiler: >> It appears as though gcc hard-codes the path for the startup file >> on armhf, while it doesn't do so on x86. A simple way to try this >> out, even without dietlibc: >> >> cat > hello.c <> #include >> >> int main() >> { >>