On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 06:12:44PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Ah, now I understand the output. I initially thought rbuild
> was just the first build, and didn't give it too much thought
> since I didn't expect diffoscope to be called there.
rbuild is the first build + some output from the
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:45:24 +0100
Source: strip-nondeterminism
Binary: libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl strip-nondeterminism
dh-strip-nondeterminism
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.031-1~bpo8+1
Distribution:
On 02/18/2017 05:54 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 05:50:25PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Can I find that piece of information somewhere on that page?
>
> Yes, at the bottom of the rbuild log.
Ah, now I understand the output. I initially thought rbuild
was just the
strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1.dsc
strip-nondeterminism_0.031-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl_0.031-1~bpo8+1_all.deb
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 05:50:25PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 02/18/2017 05:42 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> >> but where did the link to the diffoscope output go on the
> >> website?
> > Where it is always been.
>
> And
On 02/18/2017 05:42 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> but where did the link to the diffoscope output go on the
>> website?
> Where it is always been.
And I assume that because diffoscope failed there's no link there
and that's why I
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> maybe this is a case of me overlooking the obvious, but where did
> the link to the diffoscope output go on the website?
Where it is always been.
> targetcli-fb is unreproducible in testing right now (I just
> noticed), and I
FYI: The status of the strip-nondeterminism source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.029-2
Current version: 0.031-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
Dear reproducible-builds team,
maybe this is a case of me overlooking the obvious, but where did
the link to the diffoscope output go on the website?
targetcli-fb is unreproducible in testing right now (I just
noticed), and I can find the build logs + the diff of the build
logs, but I can't seem
Hi there,
On 11/05/2016 12:09 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Christian Seiler:
>> It appears as though gcc hard-codes the path for the startup file
>> on armhf, while it doesn't do so on x86. A simple way to try this
>> out, even without dietlibc:
>>
>> cat > hello.c <> #include
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo