On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:54:31PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Therefore, I'd like to delete that directory, and also change the
> "policy" to "move old packages to ../old-packages" to "delete old
> packages" when they are superseded by a newer version.
fine with me and thanks for bringing
Hi gang,
In the past some people expressed concerns about deleting old packages
from our repository on alioth. ISTR the motivation was somewhere on the
lines of "being able to reproduce old builds", or so.
That's why in the past I used to check for builds done with an older
version, reschedule
Shirish,
> would it be much work converting all the base build/compiling tools
> to buster.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your question but here is no conversion work
required; we already test stable in stable, testing in testing, unstable
in unstable. No "retooling" is required.
Hope that
Control: tag -1 pending
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:14:42AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I suspect it would be vastly more readable with two well-placed new
> lines. :)
Thanks for the report, fixed in 212563a.
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #866577 [diffoscope] diffoscope: Synopsis in manpage lists 3 use-cases in
one line without any delimiters
Added tag(s) pending.
--
866577: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: diffoscope
Version: 83
Severity: minor
Hi,
The diffoscope manpage lists the following as SYNOPSIS:
"""
diffoscope [-h] [--json output] [OPTIONS] file1 file2 diffoscope [-h] [OPTIONS]
diff_file diffoscope [-h] [OPTIONS] < diff_file
"""
I suspect it would be vastly more readable with
