On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> this bug has been listed in the "NMU campaign" email on d-devel. But I wonder
> how it ended up there.
That's just an UDD query… But I wonder whether this bug should be
tagged as "infrastructure" (which would have avoid it
Hi,
this bug has been listed in the "NMU campaign" email on d-devel. But I wonder
how it ended up there. There are still open problems that are not answered, the
fix for this is still blocked by another bug (#802241) which is not on the NMU
list, and the code I wrote to fix the problem
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:32:50PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Please review it and let's discuss here the bits you do not agree about
> the plan.
Alright, so everybody liked the plan and only wording changes happened.
ISTM that there are actually fewer packages/bugs than what I thought,
only
Hi people,
As we mentioned in our recent report[0], we have realised just how
many of the patches we have submitted[1] have been regrettably
unacknowledged or otherwise have not uploaded to Debian.
That's why are planning a NMU campaign to lower the number of open
reproducible bugs. We have
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for week 118's blog post:
Now published at https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/posts/118/
Many thanks all!
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb, Debian Project Leader
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
