Re: [Reproducible-builds] Number of CPUs for armhf builds

2016-03-07 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 7. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Sure, but I suspect there are *some* builds that will never succeed in > under 12 hours with a single CPU core (on the current armhf build > hardware, anyways). I doubt there are many of those, who will manage with dual-cores in 12h,

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Number of CPUs for armhf builds

2016-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-03-07, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> > I'm also pondering to change it to use CPUs+1 for the first builds and >> > CPUs for the 2nd ones. >> That would be interesting, although I was thinking we might want to do a >> fewer number of CPUs on

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Number of CPUs for armhf builds

2016-03-07 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > I'm also pondering to change it to use CPUs+1 for the first builds and > > CPUs for the 2nd ones. > That would be interesting, although I was thinking we might want to do a > fewer number of CPUs on the first build, to make it more likely

[Reproducible-builds] Number of CPUs for armhf builds

2016-03-06 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-03-06, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> Ah, looking at: >> >> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/reproducible.html ... >> I guess it must just use the number of CPUs for first build, and number >> of CPUs-1 for the second build (at least on