On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 04:02:20PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Yes. I tried the same package you brought as an example,
> > systray-mdstat, which has png files that gets modified.
>
> Huh? Maybe there has been a misunderstanding, but it didn't do that
> for me:
>
> Neither
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Did your example contain a PNG which needs a fixup?
>
> Yes. I tried the same package you brought as an example,
> systray-mdstat, which has png files that gets modified.
Huh? Maybe there has been a misunderstanding, but it didn't do that
for me:
Neither
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > I tried live patching strip-nd by chaging the
> > open(my $fh, '+<', $filename)
> > to
> > open(my $fh, '<', $filename)
> > and indeed I could get a build completely identical to the one done
> > without R³ and unpatched
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:21:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > I tried live patching strip-nd by chaging the
> > open(my $fh, '+<', $filename)
> > to
> > open(my $fh, '<',
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 02:21:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Do I understand it correctly that with "Rules-Requires-Root: no" the
> > root:root ownership is only set by dh_builddeb?
>
> Well, by dpkg-deb of course :)
> Check the --root-owner-group option
Hi Niels,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Thanks for testing R³ in the wild. :)
I really like that idea.
Do I understand it correctly that with "Rules-Requires-Root: no" the
root:root ownership is only set by dh_builddeb?
I initially thought quite a while about to which mailing list I should
send those
