Re: opi2a back! init system variations?

2016-10-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 06:46:50PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > and now also been added back to the build network, with 3 new builder > jobs for a total of 60 (running on a total of 20 armhf boards). ^ 22 armhf board is correct :) (+sorry for the

Re: opi2a back! init system variations?

2016-10-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Hey, On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 08:42:17PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > opi2a is back! and now also been added back to the build network, with 3 new builder jobs for a total of 60 (running on a total of 20 armhf boards). Not sure how to rearrange build jobs off the top of my > For some

Re: opi2a back! init system variations?

2016-10-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2016-10-05 23:42:17 -0400, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > The whole ordeal did trigger a thought about adding init system > variations to the builds... at least could do systemd and sysvinit at > the moment without a *huge* amount of trouble, unless we're relying on > some init-specific

opi2a back! init system variations?

2016-10-05 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
opi2a is back! Not sure how to rearrange build jobs off the top of my head, but we've got several cores just sittle idle again. :) For some reason, systemd wasn't starting consistantly, hanging on systemd-logind. Oddly, it worked well enough to still run build jobs, but restarting daemons and