[Reproducible-builds] TT Swift Payment Copy !!

Dear Sir, Sorry for the late reply. Please find the transfer swift copy attached. Please Confirm receipt and let us know if the order is now ready. Regards, Ashan Bachi Dear Sir, Sorry for the late reply. Please find the transfer swift copy attached. Please Confirm receipt and let us know if

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main

Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes (Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main): However, for packages that don't use a framework we can fix, or which use a tool that has no plans to adopt these kinds of modes upstream, I think that if

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#778571: sbuild: predictible build location for reproducible builds

Package: sbuild Version: 0.65.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Thanks for maintaining sbuild! In order to use sbuild for reproducible builds, the build dir needs to be consistent across rebuilds, but sbuild currenty generates a randomly named build dir. The following proof-of-concept patch

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#778563: differing header files

Source: witty Version: 3.3.3+dfsg-4.1 User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on Debian's “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that witty doesn't build reproducibly [2]. There is a difference in the header file /usr/include/Wt/WConfig.h. Depending on the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#778570: sbuild: ignore .buildinfo files in .changes

Package: sbuild Version: 0.65.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Thanks for maintaining sbuild! When using dpkg from the reproducible builds toolchain, it generates a .buildinfo file in the .changes file:

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Patches for sbuild reproducible builds

On 2015-02-16, Holger Levsen wrote: On Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: One patch sets the build dir to a static location based on the package version, rather than a tempdir with a random string. The other patch ignores .buildinfo files in the .changes when displaying

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Patches for sbuild reproducible builds

Hi, Quoting Vagrant Cascadian (2015-02-16 21:01:18) Also, pbuilder and sbuild would need to ensure the same exact package set from build dependencies; there are various different dependency resolvers which might result in differences that could cause unreproducibility... this has been taken

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Preliminary review of dpkg-genbuildinfo

Daniel Kahn Gillmor: On Fri 2015-02-13 03:36:20 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I think it would be much simpler to just have the single package signature that is embedded in the package file itself, like Android APKs and Java JARs. Since the package is built reproducibly, anyone who

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Debian Wiki] Update of ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInClassFilesCompiledByGroovy by ReinerHerrmann

Debian Wiki: New page: Java classes (.class) that were compiled by the groovy compiler (groovyc) contain timestamps. See also: [[http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/39306/|Thread on groovy-user mailing list]] = Detection = The diff of .class files contains the string

[Reproducible-builds] TT Swift Payment Copy !!

___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

[Reproducible-builds] TT Swift Payment Copy !!

___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds