Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo"):
> On Wed 2017-06-21 13:38:42 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Certainly `dgit push' will not do anything to any .buildinfo you may
> > have. I think maybe that your use case should be supported by having
&
present in the
uploader's version control (eg, by the use of dgit).
Therefore, dgit should not include .buildinfos in source-only uploads
it performs. If dgit sees that a lower-layer tool like
dpkg-buildpackage provided a .buildinfo for a source-only upload, dgit
should strip it out of .chan
Hi, Ximin. Thanks for your attention.
Ximin Luo writes ("Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo"):
> Also the man page for dpkg-buildpackage is out-of-date:
I think maybe you should file a bug about these ?
> >> So I think for `dgit push-source', there should be no .buildinfo ?
> >> At least,
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo"):
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:59:55AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [Ian:]
> > > Alternatively dgit could strip out the .buildinfo, depending on
> > > whether it ran rules clean.
>
> Wh
(Resending with the right CC for reproducible-builds@lists.a.d.o)
Hi. I'm widening the scope of this thread because I think the
reproducible builds folks might have an opinion. (Holger said on IRC
that they'd welcome a CC.) So, I'm going to recap.
dpkg-buildpackage -S (which is the
Cyril Brulebois writes ("Re: misleading timestamps in binnmus"):
> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (2016-11-09):
> > What version of sbuild do buildds run ? Ie, supposing that this is
> > fixed in sbuild in stretch, will this be fixed on the buildds
TE_EPOCH.
I think this is a good option to have, just for flexibility's sake,
but I don't think debrebuild.pl should use it.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_13_02
Regexp bracketed character sets with ranges depend on locale.
Point 7 of:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap09.html#tag_09_03_05
--
Ian Jackson <ij
Thanks to everyone who has provided information. I have summarised
it in #843773, against sbuild.
What version of sbuild do buildds run ? Ie, supposing that this is
fixed in sbuild in stretch, will this be fixed on the buildds ? Or do
we need to update jessie, or what ?
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson
n the
.deb's binnmu changelog stanza. So I think the .deb's binnmu
changelog stanza can be the date of the build (or the date of the
binnmu request, or whatever is convenient).
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @f
DEBIAN_LAST_CHANGE ?= $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -S Date)
which would make it possible for a buildd to override the value.
Thanks for your attention.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.
Reproducible builds folks writes (Reproducible Builds — proo f of concept
successful for 83% of all sources in main):
Progress
Thanks for the update and keep up the good work.
Regards,
Ian.
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes (Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds —
proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main):
However, for packages that don't use a framework we can fix, or which
use a tool that has no plans to adopt these kinds of modes upstream,
I think that if
13 matches
Mail list logo
