package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.3.0-21+really16.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/python-setuptools_39.0.1-1.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Re: Fwd: [migration of alioth list reproducible-commits]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:55:35PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > So, I'm going to ask them to skip our list, and then in the next weeks > work on moving stuff to rb-commits@ instead (this will also include > moving the subscribers once the mails moved). FYI, that's now done. I: * subsc

Bug#893324: diffoscope: terminology used in docs about exclusion options

ope output. Please check out the latest commit, I added 'ignore' to help grepping through the manpage. Hopefully that's enough to cover your wish :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more a

Re: pocl has reproducible test result: FTBFS

rt, you haven't restricted the architectures it can be built for. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpa

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.3.0-15+really11.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Accepted diffoscope 91~bpo9+1 (source) into stretch-backports

lds@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> Description: diffoscope - in-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories Closes: 849386 863879 863880 877726 886736 886963 887180 888112 888401 888402 890528 Changes: diffoscope (91~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; ur

Bug#891903: diffoscope: programming error in except clause

FTR, this happened also on ubuntu autopkgtest, where the tests fail on armhf, arm64, ppc64el, s390x whilst it passes on x86. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/diffoscope I planned on debugging that next week (as I need to do it anyway to get it land on ubuntu) On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:57

Bug#891867: diffoscope: improve .changes diffs

ut for sure it is the simplest way to make the diff behaviour here saner. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://la

Accepted diffoscope 91 (source) into unstable

org> Changed-By: Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> Description: diffoscope - in-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories Closes: 849386 863879 863880 877726 886736 886963 887180 888112 888401 888402 890528 Changes: diffoscope (91) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Mattia Rizzolo ]

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.3.0-9+really5.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Re: [disorderfs] 02/02: Override no-upstream-changelog as we are upstream.

le mode 100644 > index 000..fc882fe > --- /dev/null > +++ b/debian/disorderfs.lintian-overrides > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +no-upstream-changelog Also please add a comment next to the override itself explaining the reasons for the override. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo

Re: Fwd: [migration of alioth list reproducible-commits]

ml, so feel free to reply to the mail you got :) So, I'm going to ask them to skip our list, and then in the next weeks work on moving stuff to rb-commits@ instead (this will also include moving the subscribers once the mails moved). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE

Fwd: [migration of alioth list reproducible-commits]

he new service can be found here: <https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/MailingListContinuation> Thanks, the alioth-lists migration team. [1] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2018/01/msg3.html> - End forwarded message - -- regards, Matt

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.3.0-5+really1.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Bug#887180: diffoscope should depend on e2fsprogs explicitly

gs used by diffoscope. Thanks, applied! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'

Bug#888112: diffoscope: compare JSON files using Python jsondiff module

/10 so that they will land to stretch-backports' NEW after they migrate to testing (as python-jsondiff was accepted into unstable for the first time only two days ago). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more ab

Bug#888112: diffoscope: compare JSON files using Python jsondiff module

│ "website_url": "" │ } 1 mattia@warren /tmp % :( Which is arguably even much better than what you get from t

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/dpkg_1.19.0.5.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: packages that FTBFS twice in a row ...

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 08:27:50AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:43:34PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > So, yes, source packages can be built reproducibly! > > neat, thanks for pointing this out! In which version of dpkg was that > feature? dpkg

Re: packages that FTBFS twice in a row ...

##| 100% Time: 0:00:00 mattia@warren ~/devel/reproducible/diffoscope % So, yes, source packages can be built reproducibly! :D -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://ma

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.2.0-21+really17.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.2.0-18+really14.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Re: Please review the draft for week 132's blog post

oday) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/d

Re: [Qa-jenkins-dev] Bug#880873: jenkins.debian.org: Move some IRC announcements to #debian-reproducible-changes.

t. I'm torn on this: I don't find the current scheduling messages to be _so_ noisy. I'd like to hear what the other people that lurk in the channel thing of this change (hence CCing reproducible-builds ML). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3

Re: [diffoscope] 01/01: test_dtb.py: Only parse the version number, not any "-dirty" suffix. (Closes: #880279)

You did this, but actually the bug was already fixed (i.e. it wasn't broken by the "-dirty" suffix, but due to the output changing the order of the lines) Nonetheless, I find your solution of using a regular expression superior to my guesswork, but I would have still considered the -dirty suffix

Re: [debhelper-devel] "Rules-Requires-Root: no" vs ExtUtils::Install + dh_strip_nondeterminism

clamp-timestamp) > > Pending release, shall I cut one right away? > > I'd be happy if it would only take days (and not weeks) to get this > fix into unstable. But that's just my wish. :-) Ok, I'll see about it ;) -- regards,

Re: [debhelper-devel] "Rules-Requires-Root: no" vs ExtUtils::Install + dh_strip_nondeterminism

it. > > So, I think that to handle this issue we should just drop that single > > byte from strip-nd and consider it done. > > \O/ https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/strip-nondeterminism.git/commit/?id=e32fed6 Pending release, shall I cut one right away? -- regards,

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/dpkg_1.19.0.4.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#878342: diffoscope: incredibly huge amount of temporary files when comparing src:wine artifacts

it died it left around 21 GB of temporary files, not sure whether all the 50 GB were used in a specific moment, but even 21 GB are a lot. I have the artifacts available (~ 200 MB) if anybody wants to investigate. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18

Re: apg bug report #870890 fixed in last version

-- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://q

Re: Please review the draft for week 126's blog post

here are other things like this. What I was about, is that the sentence implies that what's *right after* is all the changelog of the release, which is not right. I've committed a change to the template, could you please check it out whether it looks alright to you? -- regards,

Re: Please review the draft for week 126's blog post

ter fixed in the template. I already had to do something similar in e222b3a and fd352f9 for example. The point being, that sentence about diffoscope seems to imply that's all that went into release, which ain't true. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 D

package uploaded to our repo

https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/gcc-7_7.2.0-10.0+really6~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list

Bug#876140: strip-nondeterminism: log which handlers "strip-nd"s a file

(even if it might be obvious for most cases) to print the name of the handler that does the normalization. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org

Bug#875324: diffoscope: Increased number of timeouts in recent versions?

a general slowness and also causing more "diffoscope timeouts". -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: ht

Bug#875280: diffoscope: ValueError: Unable to parse diff headers

utf-8', errors='replace')) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/diffoscope/diff.py", line 90, in read_headers raise ValueError('Unable to parse diff headers: %r' % line) ValueError: Unable to parse diff headers: 'diff: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open sha

Outreachy 15 for Reproducible Builds

to the relevant line, I kept the last confirmed co-mentors in the page in a separated line. Also please read the whole page again, and commit directly any modification you'd find an improvement. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540

Re: [disorderfs] 04/06: Update to latest Standards-Version; no changes required

also add your key to debian/upstream/signing-key.asc, bonus for using misc.git/dump-keys.sh which I personally like quite a lot over the usual gpg "dumb dump" :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B

Re: Bug#844431: Revised patch: seeking seconds

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, 11:02 p.m. Adrian Bunk wrote: > Tracker: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/hsqldb1.8.0 > "Does not build reproducibly during testing" > And indeed it's not reproducible according to policy: it's storing the build user at the very least. > > Let's look at

Re: Revised patch: seeking seconds

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017, 6:15 a.m. Stuart Prescott, wrote: > Policy is not a stick but policy can document where we want to be, > particularly when we are talking about standard practice. It is already > standard practice that packages build reproducibly with things like build- >

Re: Requsting help: reproducibility regressions in pwgen and e2fsprogs?

e2fsprogs for rebuild now, thye should turn sunny soon. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net

Bug#871413: diffoscope: AssertionError with cups/2.2.4-3 in unstable/amd64

ters/html/html.py", line 705, in output_html self.output_difference(ctx, difference) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/diffoscope/presenters/html/html.py", line 615, in output_difference assert node is difference AssertionError (I haven't tried to reproduce it nor anything)

Bug#871244: diffoscope: support keybox files with kbxutil

o, do you plan on sending a patch for diffoscope? :D -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri

Re: sbuild: please add the srebuild sbuild wrapper to reproduce builds

ached to the d-d mail) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.de

Re: NMU campagin

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:32:50PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Please review it and let's discuss here the bits you do not agree about > the plan. Alright, so everybody liked the plan and only wording changes happened. ISTM that there are actually fewer packages/bugs than what I thought

NMU campaign for Reproducible Builds patches

rently plan to start sometime during DebConf (or DebCamp), without any specific priority or rate. Best wishes, Mattia Rizzolo Chris Lamb Holger Levsen PS: no, this time Jenkins will not do anything, all the NMU work will be carried out by humans! [0] https://lists.deb

Status update from the Reproducible Builds project

some expenses for our physical meetups ... and many others that helped us along the path. Also many thanks to all those of you that contributed to the project, and also those that simply merged our patches: all of you helped a lot! Best wishes, for the Reproducible Builds team,

Bug#866120: diffoscope: please add an xml comparator

rds, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.

Re: d-d-a draft, please review

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, 10:14 a.m. Chris Lamb, wrote: > (Just to clarify; you don't wish to mention a potential NMU campaign > or a change to Policy? Perhaps I'm forgetting our "plan" here...) > That's correct. I don't want to put in d-d-a something that could potentially be

Re: d-d-a draft, please review

I gently remind you of this; I plan to send it out in 2 days. On Thu, 13 Jul 2017, 9:25 p.m. Mattia Rizzolo, <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:43:04AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > Happy to review, just let me know where the text is to review! :)

Bug#868534: diffoscope: autopkgtest failure

te(msg) E - ValueError: I/O operation on closed file. so my feeling is that it has to do with something like https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/14 (but there are countless other examples on the net) needless to say, we need to workaround this somehow. -- regards,

d-d-a draft, please review

seup.net/p/reproducible-irc-meeting-10 I intend to send it out by the 20th at the latest (but happy to do before if we manage to have it ready). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://m

deleting old patched packages from our repository

to "move old packages to ../old-packages" to "delete old packages" when they are superseded by a newer version. Comments welcome. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://ma

Bug#866120: diffoscope: please add an xml comparator

Source: diffoscope Version: 83 Severity: wishlist Currently scribus treats XML files as regular text files. I believe it could be better by trying to understand them, like it's done for .json, and provide a more smart output. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE

Bug#865625: diffoscope: autopkgtest failure

1 failed, 221 passed, 129 skipped in 61.54 seconds == -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpa

no plans for strip-nd in stretch-backports

. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org

Re: testing buster now

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:29:08AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:04:31AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > It seems we broke the DDPO once again… > > whom do we contact to get this fixed? Techinically, we both can fix it :P Otherwise, the usua

Re: testing buster now

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:39 AM Holger Levsen wrote: > We've added Buster yesterday and this broke at least the dashboard, which > I'm > going to fix today. If you notice any other breakage, please do tell, > either > in this thread or via irc. > It seems we broke the

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Some Debian package upgrades are corrupting rsync "quick check" backups

ing the timestamp of the last changelog entry, generate a new one (closes: #843773) In version 0.73.0-1. > b) Will this affect stretch? If so, what do we need to do now? Yes. IMHO, nothing. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B94

Bug#860428: reprotest: use an existing HOME in the control build

existent and writable HOME, and one with a non-existent one (this leaves out the case of an existent but not writable, though). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more abo

Bug#857940: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors

les-all two years ago…). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: http

Bug#857940: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors

egards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=

Re: Moving towards a deb-buildinfo(5) Format 1.0

at the above are implementation details, > and do not really affect the format. Thank you for all your work! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: move cleanup and (eg.) SIGBUS errors to #-changes

notice it some days ago: > in #d-reproducible there are a lot of messages about finished builds. > but i don't see any schedulings for them. are they no longer > announced? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .

Re: [NetBSD] Can we have another run please?

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 04:56:25PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote: > Thanks, Triggered! https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/view/Singles/job/reproducible_netbsd/143/console -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4

Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

_diffoscope_on_changes_file, iirc) and call that function. All of this would be in _build.sh. > [1] > https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20141229/000613.html We are not using that (and besides, it has another goal: to build starting from a given .buildin

Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 05:50:25PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 02/18/2017 05:42 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > >> but where did the link to the diffoscope output go on the > >> website?

Re: targetcli-fb unreproducible: where's the diffoscope output gone?

bus error... > Could you point me in the right direction? Not needed :) I just scheduled targetcli-fb/testing/amd64 to build again, I expect that will mark your package as reproducible again. Thank you for notifying us! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCC

Bug#855273: diffoscope: still fails to clean up after SIGTERM

). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org

Re: Thanks for the extra run

these requests as after reading the subjects I just ignored them Sorry, I'll try to be more careful next time! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http

Bug#855233: diffoscope: Crashes when comparing bad JSON on Python pre-3.5

Control: tag -1 pending On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:47:01PM -0500, Brett Smith wrote: > Package: diffoscope > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream patch Thank you for your bug and patch, which I merged via IRC before even noticing this bug report :) -- regards,

Re: [diffoscope] diffoscope commit mails

s, on reproducible-builds.org: https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-commits > > The only thing that I can think of that would clash with this would be > > dreamed shared notes, that by definition would need to go in that > > mailing list. > > Please don't call th

Re: diffoscope 77 in stretch or not?

s up in debian… - but how to best deal with the freeze :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/

Re: diffoscope 77 in stretch or not?

. How does it fit in this topic? :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Deb

Re: diffoscope 77 in stretch or not?

ase, and I don't want to push too much with my name ^^ -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapr

Re: diffoscope 77 in stretch or not?

ing v77 migrate, or propose a t-p-u. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`

diffoscope 77 in stretch or not?

, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia

Bug#855060: unblock: strip-nondetermism/0.031-1

+1300 Now, I don't know whether he aimed these changes for stretch or not, but I do believe they would make a good addition. Either way I'll leave the decision to you, you can find attached a debdiff between testing and unstable. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66

Bug#854937: strip-nondeterminism: autopkgtest failure on armhf

' header at /usr/share/perl5/File/StripNondeterminism/handlers/png.pm line 127. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad us

Bug#854937: strip-nondeterminism: autopkgtest failure on armhf

in the log there are several other warnings, that might be nice to fix/hide as approprited. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad u

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

source packages (then other people can provide builds for the other architectures, also). > Force-pushed as 899a13de to `export-PYTHONREVERSEDICTKEYORDER-pbuilderrc`. ↑ Holger, pls? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

capture the environment\"" > + write_page "env CAPTURE_ENVIRONMENTnot > setCAPTURE_ENVIRONMENT=\"I capture the environment\"on > amd64: PYTHONREVERSEDICTKEYORDER=1" This would be everywhere, not just amd64. Plus, I think it would look better

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:46:42AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:08:54AM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (Attachment was too large for Alioth apparently, so re-sending) > > Yes (I discarded the email from the moderation queue now)

Re: [PATCH] reproducible Debian: Reverse Python 2.x dict order in the second build.

line 682 onwards. 1 line change is better than changing dozens of files anyway, I suppose. > Please merge from the "export-PYTHONREVERSEDICTKEYORDER" branch of > https://github.com/lamby/jenkins.debian.net -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE

participation in GSoC 2017 / Outreachy 14

h the page, add/edit the suggested subprojects as you see fit. I already put Holger, Reiner, Chris and Ximin as co-mentors; please pull yourself off if you're not available to mentor this year (well, last round you were not "needed" after all :)). -- regards, Mat

Re: NetBSD run

ate it. Aye, aye, no need for so much excuses :) Running at https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/view/Singles/job/reproducible_netbsd/140/console Enjoy! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more abou

Bug#854745: diffoscope: autopkgtest failures

Control: notfound -1 65 Control: found -1 75 On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 01:30:24AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Version: 65 off by ten. Yes I know v76 is out too (and still untested), but I have no reasons to think that version fixes it. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo

Bug#854745: diffoscope: autopkgtest failures

s --hex-dump=.gnu_debuglink {} -- readelf --wide --decompress --hex-dump=.gnu_debuglink {} []>]> dbgsym_differences = ]>]>]>]> tests/comparators/test_elf.py:129: AssertionError == 11 failed, 184 passed, 91 skipped in 60.15 seconds == adt-run [23:41:54]: test

Bug#854670: diffoscope: autopkgtest failures

adt-run [06:33:36]: test command1: ---] adt-run [06:33:36]: test command1: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - - command1 FAIL non-zero exit status 2 -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18

Bug#854593: diffoscope: autopkgtest fail

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:42:36PM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > Ah, my "minimal" chroot had xxd installed. Yes, autopkgtest's chroots are *very* minimal :) Thanks for tracking this down! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4

Bug#854593: diffoscope: autopkgtest fail

Source: diffoscope Version: 71 Severity: important 71 fails the test run without any optional package ("Recommends") installed: https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/d/diffoscope/20170208_091322.autopkgtest.log.gz -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG

Re: [diffoscope] diffoscope commit mails

by definition would need to go in that mailing list. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~ma

Re: diffoscope commit mails

diffoscope@l.r-b.o either, but instead rb-commits@l.r-b.o, same for the other non-debian specific stuff. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :

Re: Please review the draft for week 92's blog post

n Jan 30 23:59:00 UTC 2017' I have no time for this, but please add something reporting about the recent changes that happened in dpkg to the buildinfo generator (i.e. read the dpkg changelog). (with thanks from guillem whom reminded me of this…) -- regards, Mattia Rizzol

Re: Some Debian package upgrades are corrupting rsync "quick check" backups

after a fairly long and annoying discussion in debian-devel: * For binNMUs, instead of copying the timestamp of the last changelog entry, generate a new one (closes: #843773) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .

Bug#852013: Patch to prevent segfaults on signal

to get in at some point (pity also because Debian is now freezing, and we need to get the package into stretch, etc... -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org

Bug#852015: diffoscope: Suggested improvements to --help output and CONTRIBUTING

BUTING, if you want to look at it again/more). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~m

Bug#852013: diffoscope: (possible) regression in tempfile clean up

-- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/develop

Re: ftbfs_due_to_semaphore_setup for qtwebengine on abel.d.o

then we'll test if it also fixes tests.reproducible-build.org's bugs). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchp

  1   2   3   >