Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#138409: Bug#138409: Bug#138409: dpkg-dev: please add support for .buildinfo files

2016-02-04 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Guillem Jover (2016-02-04 09:44:13) > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 14:43:08 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > and “Installed-Build-Depends” for the list of packages? > > I asked for more suggestions on #debian-dpkg, and Johannes Schauer > suggested Transitive-Build-Depends, which is something

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#138409: Bug#138409: Bug#138409: dpkg-dev: please add support for .buildinfo files

2016-02-04 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 14:43:08 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Guillem Jover: > > > How about naming the field “Environment-Variables”? > > > > Hmm, or Environment, or Build-Environment, which reminds me that I've > > found the usage of Build-Environment (as the list of transitively > >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#138409: Bug#138409: Bug#138409: dpkg-dev: please add support for .buildinfo files

2016-02-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > A breakdown of the change since the last submitted patch is available > for easier review: > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/log/?h=pu/buildinfo should we upload a package based on this branch to our repo? cheers,

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#138409: Bug#138409: Bug#138409: dpkg-dev: please add support for .buildinfo files

2016-02-02 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Holger Levsen: > On Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > A breakdown of the change since the last submitted patch is available > > for easier review: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/log/?h=pu/buildinfo > > should we upload a package based on this branch to