Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main

2015-05-06 Thread Reiner Herrmann
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:53:51AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Reproducible builds folks reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org (2015-02-13): Bug filing with patches === We have started to propose patches to make packages build reproducibly and tagged them

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main

2015-05-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Reproducible builds folks reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org (2015-02-13): Bug filing with patches === We have started to propose patches to make packages build reproducibly and tagged them with appropriate usertags and the user

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main

2015-02-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes (Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main): However, for packages that don't use a framework we can fix, or which use a tool that has no plans to adopt these kinds of modes upstream, I think

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main

2015-02-13 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, I applaud this initiative. On 13-02-15 18:28, Reproducible builds folks wrote: If you want to help, a first step is to check the reproducibility of your packages [DDLIST]. Feel free to ask for help on the reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org mailing list or in #debian-reproducible