Github user funes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/661#discussion_r12311565
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Vectors.scala
---
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ object Vectors {
new DenseVector(v.toArray)
Github user funes closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/661
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12311588
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -68,7 +69,28 @@ class DecisionTree (private val strategy: Strategy)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12311590
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -68,7 +69,28 @@ class DecisionTree (private val strategy: Strategy)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12311634
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -68,7 +69,28 @@ class DecisionTree (private val strategy: Strategy)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12311646
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -269,7 +296,50 @@ object DecisionTree extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12311692
--- Diff: mllib/data/sample_naive_bayes_data.txt ---
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-0, 1 0 0
-0, 2 0 0
-1, 0 1 0
-1, 0 2 0
-2, 0 0 1
-2, 0 0 2
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12311733
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -269,7 +296,50 @@ object DecisionTree extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12311753
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ application name), as well as arbitrary key-value pairs
through the `set()` meth
initialize an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/658
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42271752
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42271750
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12312167
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -390,6 +391,53 @@ class DecisionTreeSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12312185
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +460,20 @@ object DecisionTreeSuite {
arr
}
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42271981
@manishamde Could you mention how to configure `maxMemoryInMB` in the
programming guide?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user pwendell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/662
Fix two download suggestions in the docs:
1) On the quick start page provide a direct link to the downloads
(suggested by @pbailis).
2) On the index page, don't suggest users always have to
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42272079
@mengxr Thanks for the feedback. The review and corresponding edits
happened in real-time. :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/662#discussion_r12312305
--- Diff: docs/index.md ---
@@ -50,23 +51,6 @@ options for deployment:
* [Apache Mesos](running-on-mesos.html)
* [Hadoop YARN](running-on-yarn.html)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/662#issuecomment-42272156
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42272159
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42272151
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/662#issuecomment-42272149
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12312343
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ application name), as well as arbitrary key-value pairs
through the `set()` meth
initialize an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42272361
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42272366
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12312420
--- Diff: mllib/data/sample_naive_bayes_data.txt ---
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-0, 1 0 0
-0, 2 0 0
-1, 0 1 0
-1, 0 2 0
-2, 0 0 1
-2, 0 0 2
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12312438
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -405,16 +453,30 @@ object DecisionTreeSuite {
def
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12312434
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -390,13 +391,60 @@ class DecisionTreeSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/448#issuecomment-42272515
@kanzhang this is out of date with master - mind merging it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#discussion_r12312446
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/configuration/Strategy.scala
---
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42272628
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/662#issuecomment-42272627
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14705/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/662#issuecomment-42272626
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42272629
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14706/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12312622
--- Diff: docs/mllib-naive-bayes.md ---
@@ -58,29 +67,36 @@ optionally smoothing parameter `lambda` as input, and
output a
can be used for evaluation and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42273195
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14704/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42273193
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42273467
+1 on @srowen 's suggestion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42273877
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42273875
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42273835
@mengxr now good ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42273881
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42273890
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42274037
@techaddict For training, we should keep the `r - 2.5`s, which indicate
confidence. For evaluation, we could either use `if (r 2.5) 1.0 else 0.0` or
weighted RMSE
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42274281
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42274282
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14707/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42275971
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42275972
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14708/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42276017
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/475#issuecomment-42276019
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14709/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/663#issuecomment-42277842
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12314729
--- Diff: docs/mllib-naive-bayes.md ---
@@ -58,29 +67,36 @@ optionally smoothing parameter `lambda` as input, and
output a
can be used for evaluation and
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12314786
--- Diff: docs/mllib-naive-bayes.md ---
@@ -58,29 +67,36 @@ optionally smoothing parameter `lambda` as input, and
output a
can be used for evaluation and
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42278530
`ratings` is correct. `test` also need to check `implicitPrefs`. If
`implicitPrefs`, predictions should map to `if (pred 1.0) 1.0 else if (pred
0.0) 0.0 else pred`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42279714
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42279724
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42279779
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42279780
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14711/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#discussion_r12315475
--- Diff: docs/mllib-naive-bayes.md ---
@@ -58,29 +67,36 @@ optionally smoothing parameter `lambda` as input, and
output a
can be used for evaluation and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42280473
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42280464
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42280860
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42280865
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/665
SPARK-1734: spark-submit throws an exception: Exception in thread main...
... java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.spark.broadcast.TorrentBroadcastFactory
You can merge this pull request into
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/571#issuecomment-42283416
@tdas ok I'll move streaming examples to
org.apache.spark.streaming.examples.* as you suggest. Any other changes
@mateiz
---
If your project is set up for it, you
GitHub user funes reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/661
Bug fix of sparse vector conversion
Fixed a small bug caused by the inconsistency of index/data array size and
vector length.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/661#issuecomment-42284169
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42284626
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14712/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42284625
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14713/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#issuecomment-42284620
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/663#issuecomment-42284624
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14710/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/663#issuecomment-42284621
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/664#issuecomment-42284622
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#issuecomment-42291581
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#discussion_r12320290
--- Diff: examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/JavaTC.java ---
@@ -61,14 +62,9 @@
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#discussion_r12320627
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/BroadcastTest.scala ---
@@ -27,18 +27,18 @@ object BroadcastTest {
System.exit(1)
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#discussion_r12320653
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/GroupByTest.scala ---
@@ -19,24 +19,18 @@ package org.apache.spark.examples
import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#issuecomment-42294159
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/653#issuecomment-42294160
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14714/
---
If your project
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#discussion_r12320940
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/MultiBroadcastTest.scala ---
@@ -18,20 +18,16 @@
package org.apache.spark.examples
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42297067
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42297055
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42297072
@andrewor14 Thanks for taking a look ! I have fixed those, and at some
places those args were optional arguments for which it may be not logical to
have args.length
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42298879
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42298871
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42300392
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/666
Remove unnecessary Code from spark-shell.cmd
I don't see a reason to find path of bin directory.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/666#issuecomment-42300903
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42300383
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/577#issuecomment-42302718
Thanks for your review. Already updated it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42303614
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14715/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42303612
Build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user ArcherShao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/667
Update OpenHashSet.scala
Modify wrong comment of function addWithoutResize.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ArcherShao/spark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/636#issuecomment-42304895
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/636#issuecomment-42304878
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/667#issuecomment-42304875
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42306397
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/14716/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42306396
Build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dkanoafry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/627#discussion_r12326286
--- Diff: make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -50,6 +50,20 @@ if [ $? == -1 ] ;then
exit -1;
fi
+if [ -z ${JAVA_HOME} ]; then
+ echo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/552#issuecomment-42308490
Build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 356 matches
Mail list logo
