Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808169
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -140,14 +144,39 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48697796
QA tests have started for PR 993. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16557/consoleFull
---
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808250
--- Diff: python/pyspark/join.py ---
@@ -1,35 +1,19 @@
-
-Copyright (c) 2011, Douban Inc. http://www.douban.com/
-All rights reserved.
-
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808269
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -140,14 +144,39 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager)
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808344
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkEnv.scala ---
@@ -67,10 +67,14 @@ class SparkEnv (
val metricsSystem: MetricsSystem,
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808675
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808684
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808671
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808679
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808688
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808707
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808705
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808714
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1371#issuecomment-48699285
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808775
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -463,16 +463,16 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808809
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -87,9 +97,32 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808804
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808829
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808850
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14808860
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808921
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14808944
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1354#discussion_r14809046
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -509,7 +522,8 @@ def sortByKey(self, ascending=True, numPartitions=None,
keyfunc = lambda x: x):
tmp2 =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1370#issuecomment-48700541
QA results for PR 1370:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14809203
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/955#issuecomment-48701090
QA tests have started for PR 955. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16558/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#issuecomment-48701135
Did an initial pass with some feedback - not totally done yet but it should
be enough to get some work done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48701944
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/955#issuecomment-48702465
QA tests have started for PR 955. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16561/consoleFull
---
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14809771
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -463,16 +463,16 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14809809
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14809836
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -87,9 +97,32 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14809878
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -140,14 +144,39 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager)
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14809944
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14809936
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -140,14 +144,39 @@ private[spark] class CacheManager(blockManager:
BlockManager)
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14810031
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/SizeTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/931#issuecomment-48703798
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/181#issuecomment-48704142
Cool - thanks for contributing the test! Jenkins, test this please. LGTM
pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/181#issuecomment-48704291
QA tests have started for PR 181. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16563/consoleFull
---
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1354#discussion_r14810364
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -509,7 +522,8 @@ def sortByKey(self, ascending=True, numPartitions=None,
keyfunc = lambda x: x):
tmp2
Github user drexin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1358#issuecomment-48706534
Hi Patrick,
the problem is described in [this mailing list
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48706567
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16564/consoleFull
---
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1134#issuecomment-48707013
Thanks Michael ,
(1) We could make it as a user hint ,like hive does .
set hive.optimize.skewjoin = true;
set hive.skewjoin.key = skew_key_threshold
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48707227
Wasn't this already decided against in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332 and again
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1208 ? or is this not another PR for
Github user drexin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1358#issuecomment-48707209
Created a JIRA issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2445
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1134#issuecomment-48707289
Hi , I also make a left semi join .I don't know is this join as a
optimization as the left semi join or as a single join algorithm. I think the
1127 PR also has some
Github user YanjieGao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1134#discussion_r14811559
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins.scala ---
@@ -400,3 +401,73 @@ case class BroadcastNestedLoopJoin(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/955#issuecomment-48708106
QA results for PR 955:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48708268
#332 can't automatic test .
#1208 was messing up and I do not know how to solve . :sweat:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user fireflyc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1372
replace println to log4j
Our program needs to receive a large amount of data and run for a long
time.
We set the log level to WARN but Storing iterator received single
as such message
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332#issuecomment-48708675
It can't automatic test. I submit a new PR #1369.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1372#issuecomment-48708875
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/955#issuecomment-48709108
QA results for PR 955:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/955#issuecomment-48709925
QA results for PR 955:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1373
[SPARK-2446][SQL] Add BinaryType support to Parquet I/O.
To support `BinaryType`, the following changes are needed:
- Make `StringType` use `OriginalType.UTF8`
- Add `BinaryType` using
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1373#issuecomment-48710936
QA tests have started for PR 1373. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16565/consoleFull
---
Github user li-zhihui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/900#discussion_r14813843
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -46,9 +46,19 @@ class
Github user li-zhihui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/900#issuecomment-48714143
Thanks @tgravescs
I will file a new jira for handling mesos and follow it after the PR merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-48714186
QA tests have started for PR 1155. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16566/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48714364
QA results for PR 1369:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user avulanov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#discussion_r14814439
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetrics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user avulanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-48715008
@mengxr
I've addressed you comments, except the one with import which I commented
above.
I've posted a question about feature selection interface. Could
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1373#issuecomment-48718560
QA results for PR 1373:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-48720849
QA results for PR 1155:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1374#issuecomment-48722841
QA results for PR 1374:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1354#issuecomment-48725049
QA results for PR 1354:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1374#issuecomment-48725337
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1374#issuecomment-48725500
QA tests have started for PR 1374. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16569/consoleFull
---
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1279#discussion_r14821748
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends
Cloneable with
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1279#discussion_r14822032
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -167,6 +175,8 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends
Cloneable with
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1279#discussion_r14822125
--- Diff:
yarn/alpha/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ class Client(clientArgs: ClientArguments,
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1279#discussion_r14822197
--- Diff:
yarn/stable/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ class Client(clientArgs: ClientArguments, hadoopConf:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1374#issuecomment-48736229
QA results for PR 1374:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/900#discussion_r14823260
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -699,6 +699,22 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
(in
Github user fireflyc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1372#issuecomment-48739929
I have verified, the log level is set to Info right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1354#issuecomment-48740596
Found a way actually.
On Jul 11, 2014 6:07 PM, Apache Spark QA notificati...@github.com wrote:
QA results for PR 1354:
- This patch PASSES unit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/900#discussion_r14825405
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -244,6 +257,17 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1022#issuecomment-48750411
QA tests have started for PR 1022. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16570/consoleFull
---
Github user YanjieGao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1134#issuecomment-48752406
Hi I rewrite the code ,and resolve some former problem
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1366#issuecomment-48759522
@aarondav, you are totally right. However, the `Aggregate` operator that
this is replacing made the same assumption and this approach will use strictly
less memory.
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1373#issuecomment-48760249
Thanks for the patch! One quick question: will this change the behavior
when loading in string data that was saved with previous versions of Spark SQL?
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1022#issuecomment-48761837
QA results for PR 1022:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/987#issuecomment-48762832
#560 is merged. Close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dbtsai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/987
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1360#issuecomment-48762929
QA tests have started for PR 1360. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16571/consoleFull
---
Github user etrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#discussion_r14836561
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTree.scala ---
@@ -768,104 +973,157 @@ object DecisionTree extends Serializable with
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14836617
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14836715
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user etrain commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/886#issuecomment-48767401
I've gone through this in some depth, and aside from a couple of minor
style nits - the logic looks good to me. Manish - have you compared output vs.
scikit-learn for
Github user dorx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1367#discussion_r14836922
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/correlation/Correlation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user kbzod opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1375
[WIP] SPARK-2450: Add YARN executor log links to UI executors page
This adds a new column in the Executors page of the Spark UI called Logs,
visible only when running under YARN. After getting a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1375#issuecomment-48768609
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1374#issuecomment-48768736
Thanks, looks good. I tested this with:
```
SBT_MAVEN_PROFILES=yarn SBT_MAVEN_PROPERTIES=hadoop.versn=2.2.0 sbt/sbt
package
```
---
If your project is
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1336#issuecomment-48769071
LGTM with one small comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1374
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1336#discussion_r14837627
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/HistoryNotFoundPage.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14837730
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14837775
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -141,6 +174,86 @@ private class MemoryStore(blockManager: BlockManager,
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1165#discussion_r14837855
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkEnv.scala ---
@@ -67,10 +67,14 @@ class SparkEnv (
val metricsSystem: MetricsSystem,
Github user nishkamravi2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/492#issuecomment-48769703
@tgravescs Sorry, missed this one somehow. Yes, spark-submit is now fully
tested. We could keep this one open for 0.92 potentially.
---
If your project is set up
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
