Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1582#issuecomment-50110901
QA results for PR 1582:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1578#issuecomment-50110964
QA results for PR 1578:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1584#issuecomment-50111042
QA tests have started for PR 1584. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17169/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1555#issuecomment-50111308
QA tests have started for PR 1555. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17171/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1582#issuecomment-50111307
QA tests have started for PR 1582. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17170/consoleFull
---
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1538#discussion_r15387566
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ private[spark] class
Github user ash211 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1107#issuecomment-50111683
Hi @pwendell I had a minor conflict with the fix for SPARK-2392 in #1335
but it's rebased now and merges cleanly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1585
[SPARK-2683] unidoc failed because org.apache.spark.util.CallSite uses Java
keywords as value names
Renaming `short` to `shortForm` and `long` to `longForm`.
JIRA:
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/455#issuecomment-50111706
You'd need to run loading code off master branch. It should be in 1.1
release in a few weeksâ
Sent from Mailbox
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Russell
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1346#issuecomment-50111861
QA results for PR 1346:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-50111889
@kanzhang it might mean that we're reusing the Bean object on the Java side
when we read from the InputFormat. Hadoop's RecordReaders actually reuse the
same object as
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-50111934
The same thing happens in normal Spark if you create a hadoopRDD or
sequenceFile with Writables inside it, and then call cache(). There will be
only one key element and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1582#issuecomment-50111962
QA results for PR 1582:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#discussion_r15387719
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -964,6 +964,106 @@ def first(self):
return self.take(1)[0]
+def
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1583#issuecomment-50112144
Yeah weird, it must've been an oversight while editing. Unfortunately the
apache/incubator-spark repo is gone so we can't see the old PRs and comments on
them...
---
If
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-50112244
BTW you can try WritableUtils.clone. At some point we tried cloning data by
default in hadoopRDD, or having a flag for it, and we gave up because it didn't
seem to work
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1584#issuecomment-50112325
QA results for PR 1584:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
GitHub user javadba opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586
SPARK-2686 Add Length support to Spark SQL and HQL and Strlen support to SQL
Syntactic, parsing, and operational support have been added for LEN(GTH)
and STRLEN functions.
Examples:
SQL:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#issuecomment-50112581
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ash211 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-50112894
Matei, what InputFormats did you have problems with when cloning by
default? I'd love to figure out what it would take to solve the one
element/one value problem.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1554
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1554#issuecomment-50113405
Merged. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1555#issuecomment-50114262
QA results for PR 1555:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1582#issuecomment-50114354
QA results for PR 1582:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1581#issuecomment-50114457
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1581#issuecomment-50114441
I agree it is safer to put the magic byte in front of every record.
However, this is not a public API where users can throw in an arbitrary RDD and
ask the serializer to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1581#issuecomment-50114833
QA tests have started for PR 1581. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17175/consoleFull
---
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#discussion_r15388452
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -964,6 +964,106 @@ def first(self):
return self.take(1)[0]
+def
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1487#issuecomment-50115251
@pwendell this seems to pass tests now, mind to take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1499#issuecomment-50115353
Running tests with
export
SPARK_JAVA_OPTS=-Dspark.shuffle.manager=org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.SortShuffleManager
causes :
'''
- sorting using mutable
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1499#issuecomment-50115453
BTW, this is one of 5 failures from core.
I hope there are no merge issues though,
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1498#issuecomment-50115581
QA tests have started for PR 1498. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17176/consoleFull
---
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1499#issuecomment-50115862
@mridulm that should've been fixed recently in
https://github.com/mateiz/spark/commit/9c299579f13f004f5fd1f4dd0b98b7d76cac2a55,
which got rid of custom return types in
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1499#discussion_r15388684
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/SortShuffleManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-50116221
@ash211 this was the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1018. I don't remember the
problematic types exactly, but one might've been Avro records, so try
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1499#issuecomment-50116492
ah, thanks ! rerunning with 9c29957.
cant pull the pr - and manual merge is painful, hence delays in testing :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587
[sql] fix DEFAULT_INITIAL_BUFFER_SIZE
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/scwf/spark fixColumnBuilder
Alternatively you can review
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#discussion_r15388927
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -964,6 +964,106 @@ def first(self):
return self.take(1)[0]
+def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587#issuecomment-50116636
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1559#issuecomment-50116742
QA tests have started for PR 1559. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17178/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1559#issuecomment-50116749
QA results for PR 1559:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1555#issuecomment-50117105
Merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1555
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user javadba commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1542#discussion_r15389491
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ private[spark] abstract class MapOutputTracker(conf:
SparkConf)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389599
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/DistributionGenerator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389612
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/RandomRDDGenerators.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389618
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/RandomRDDGenerators.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389602
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/DistributionGenerator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389629
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/RandomRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389640
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/RandomRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389665
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/RandomRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389671
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/DistributionGeneratorSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389681
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/RandomRDDGeneratorsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389677
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/RandomRDDGeneratorsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389645
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/RandomRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389694
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/RandomRDDGeneratorsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1498#issuecomment-50118861
QA results for PR 1498:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brabstract class
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389761
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/RandomRDDGeneratorsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389784
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/RandomRDDGeneratorsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15389923
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/random/DistributionGeneratorSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1460#issuecomment-50119786
Awesome!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#discussion_r15390040
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/RandomRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1559#issuecomment-50119958
QA results for PR 1559:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1559#issuecomment-50119951
QA tests have started for PR 1559. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17179/consoleFull
---
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1583#issuecomment-50120111
Merged in master branch-1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1583
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587#discussion_r15390285
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/ColumnBuilder.scala ---
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ private[sql] class BinaryColumnBuilder extends
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1520#issuecomment-50120556
@dorx Besides comments, could you mark distribution generators and methods
that requires distribution generators `@Experimental`? Part of the reason is
that we don't have
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#discussion_r15390507
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -208,6 +208,69 @@ case class EndsWith(left:
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#discussion_r15390509
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -208,6 +208,69 @@ case class EndsWith(left:
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#discussion_r15390523
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvaluationSuite.scala
---
@@ -543,4 +546,46 @@ class
GitHub user ash211 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1588
Tests meant to demonstrate the bug in SPARK-2620
They pass though, which is not what I was expecting given the reporters
observations in the ticket
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#discussion_r15390570
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -39,12 +41,15 @@ class QueryTest extends PlanTest {
def
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#discussion_r15390556
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvaluationSuite.scala
---
@@ -543,4 +546,46 @@ class
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#issuecomment-50121152
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1588#issuecomment-50121149
QA tests have started for PR 1588. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17180/consoleFull
---
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#discussion_r15390612
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -988,8 +990,15 @@ private[hive] object HiveQl {
case
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#issuecomment-50121226
Thanks for doing this! A few minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587#discussion_r15390674
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/ColumnBuilder.scala ---
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ private[sql] class BinaryColumnBuilder extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#issuecomment-50121561
QA tests have started for PR 1586. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17181/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1586#issuecomment-50121672
QA results for PR 1586:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brtrait
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1570#issuecomment-50121775
Thanks! I've merge this into master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1569#issuecomment-50122704
I guess it is a `def` since it is not serializable...
You could make it a `@transient lazy val`.
BTW you can run the tests locally: `sbt/sbt
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587#discussion_r15391086
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/ColumnBuilder.scala ---
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ private[sql] class BinaryColumnBuilder extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1549#issuecomment-50124523
QA tests have started for PR 1549. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17182/consoleFull
---
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1572#issuecomment-50126087
ok, i understand your idea.the current implementation is let the remaning
tasks run.but that has a problem if one of remaning tasks is writing hdfs and
other new
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1113#issuecomment-50126195
@andrewor14 can you take a look at this? thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587#issuecomment-50126452
@marmbrus has already filed
[SPARK-2650](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2650) to track this
issue and assigned to me. The `104` here is definitely a
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1542#discussion_r15392537
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -162,9 +164,9 @@ private[spark] abstract class MapOutputTracker(conf:
SparkConf)
Github user scwf closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1587#issuecomment-50127420
ok.thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1589
[SPARK-2687] [yarn]amClient should remove ContainerRequest
in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1902, after receving
allocated containers,if amClient donot remove ContainerRequest,RM
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1589#issuecomment-50128259
QA tests have started for PR 1589. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17183/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1549#issuecomment-50128774
QA results for PR 1549:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1589#issuecomment-50132308
QA results for PR 1589:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
GitHub user yu-iskw opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1590
[SPARK-2547]:The clustering documentaion example provided for spark 0.9
I modified a trivial mistake in the MLlib documentation.
I checked that the python sample code for a k-means
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1590#issuecomment-50134863
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user isasmani opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1591
Remove console logging in ActorReceiver.scala
For large scale stream processing the console logging is hindering
throughput.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1591#issuecomment-50142171
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
