Github user haiyangsea commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5861#issuecomment-98316844
@rxin having-condition contains - operator.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5860#issuecomment-98317562
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5685#issuecomment-98322642
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5861#issuecomment-98323922
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5861#issuecomment-98323926
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98323820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98323796
[Test build #31652 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31652/consoleFull)
for PR 5858 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98323817
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5861#issuecomment-98323904
[Test build #31658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31658/consoleFull)
for PR 5861 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5833#issuecomment-98325906
Such a test might be confusing? See if others have some comments for that.
I would add some comments to the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862#issuecomment-98338331
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5833#issuecomment-98339049
[Test build #31660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31660/consoleFull)
for PR 5833 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5833#issuecomment-98339055
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user FlytxtRnD commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5647#issuecomment-98339048
@jkbradley , could you please check if this is ready to merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-98349632
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-98349628
[Test build #31663 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31663/consoleFull)
for PR 4783 at commit
Github user 91pavan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2994#issuecomment-98316465
@harishreedharan Any chance I can use your version from the Spark Java API?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2994#issuecomment-98318497
I have not tested it. Go ahead and try it out and let me know.
On Friday, May 1, 2015, Pavan Sudheendra notificati...@github.com wrote:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5859#issuecomment-98320002
[Test build #31651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31651/consoleFull)
for PR 5859 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5859#issuecomment-98320004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5859#issuecomment-98320005
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862#issuecomment-98326179
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862#issuecomment-98326210
[Test build #31659 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31659/consoleFull)
for PR 5862 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5833#issuecomment-98339053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-98349631
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5859#issuecomment-98320137
[Test build #31653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31653/consoleFull)
for PR 5859 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5859#issuecomment-98320140
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5859#issuecomment-98320139
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862#issuecomment-98326177
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5685#issuecomment-98322628
[Test build #31654 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31654/consoleFull)
for PR 5685 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5685#issuecomment-98322643
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98331048
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98331052
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-98342259
[Test build #31663 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31663/consoleFull)
for PR 4783 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5853#discussion_r29546728
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -108,9 +110,13 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5863#issuecomment-98347568
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5863#issuecomment-98347587
[Test build #31664 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31664/consoleFull)
for PR 5863 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5863
[SPARK-7302] [DOCS] SPARK building documentation still mentions building
for yarn 0.23
Remove references to Hadoop 0.23
CC @tgravescs Is this what you had in mind? basically all refs to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5863#issuecomment-98347570
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5864
[SPARK-7270][SQL] Consider dynamic partition when inserting into hive table
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7270
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5685
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user mridulm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862
[SPARK-7323] [Spark Core] Use insertAll instead of insert while merging
combiners in reducer
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862#issuecomment-98337899
[Test build #31659 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31659/consoleFull)
for PR 5862 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29546427
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatSuite.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,15 @@ class DataFrameStatSuite extends FunSuite {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862#issuecomment-98337919
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5862#issuecomment-98337921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5786#issuecomment-98347073
I noticed a few more things that need to be updated. Kind of confusingly,
the Spark build conflates Hadoop 1.0 with Hadoop 2.0 and 2.1, so you'll need to
add `-Phadoop-1`
Github user preeze commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5835#discussion_r29546782
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala ---
@@ -169,7 +160,7 @@ private[spark] object ClosureCleaner extends Logging {
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5784#issuecomment-98313148
cc @andrewor14 who worked a lot on this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5589#issuecomment-98322965
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tdas closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5824
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5853
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98338441
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5842#discussion_r29546443
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -77,4 +78,42 @@ private[sql] object StatFunctions {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98338438
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-98342214
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-9834
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-98342225
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98345369
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98345370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98345364
[Test build #31661 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31661/consoleFull)
for PR 5719 at commit
Github user preeze commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5835#discussion_r29546809
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1800,6 +1800,15 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5864#issuecomment-98349234
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5864#issuecomment-98349199
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5864#issuecomment-98349562
[Test build #31665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31665/consoleFull)
for PR 5864 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5589#issuecomment-98322961
[Test build #31656 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31656/consoleFull)
for PR 5589 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5589#issuecomment-98322966
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5839#discussion_r29546017
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ColumnExpressionSuite.scala ---
@@ -208,6 +208,12 @@ class ColumnExpressionSuite extends QueryTest {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5839#discussion_r29546014
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,25 @@ class Column(protected[sql] val expr: Expression)
extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5833#issuecomment-98326494
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5833#issuecomment-98326489
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5849#issuecomment-98330136
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5849#issuecomment-98330135
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5849#issuecomment-98330133
**[Test build #31657 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31657/consoleFull)**
for PR 5849 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98331549
[Test build #31661 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31661/consoleFull)
for PR 5719 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5533#discussion_r29546399
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/AllBatchesTable.scala ---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ private[ui] abstract class BatchTableBase(tableId:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5854#discussion_r29546540
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/QueryPartitionSuite.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +52,9 @@ class QueryPartitionSuite extends QueryTest {
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5786#issuecomment-98347284
@shaneknapp if this goes in, then the essence of the config change is this:
anything building for Hadoop 1.x, 2.0, or 2.1 now needs `-Phadoop-1` to
maintain the same
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98349734
[Test build #31662 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31662/consoleFull)
for PR 5858 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98349740
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5863#issuecomment-98353766
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5864#issuecomment-98356290
[Test build #31665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31665/consoleFull)
for PR 5864 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5864#issuecomment-98356292
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5864#issuecomment-98356291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5843#issuecomment-98359803
/cc @pwendell
Unlike AllJobPage and JobPage, each task-square and the corresponding entry
in the table are linked together because the table in StagePage can be
Github user kaka1992 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5839#issuecomment-98362189
please test this pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#issuecomment-98349739
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5865#issuecomment-98363881
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5580#issuecomment-98372096
@tgravescs yes, i think there are some other unit test failed. jenkins,
please test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5580#issuecomment-98372164
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5580#issuecomment-98372168
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5580#issuecomment-98372220
[Test build #31666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31666/consoleFull)
for PR 5580 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5866#issuecomment-98375780
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-98350827
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5863#issuecomment-98353762
[Test build #31664 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31664/consoleFull)
for PR 5863 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5863#issuecomment-98353767
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user kaka1992 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5865
[SPARK-7319][SQL] Improve the output from DataFrame.show()
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kaka1992/spark df.show
Github user FavioVazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5786#issuecomment-98371065
Hello @srowen I was noticing some of that things. Thank you for making it
easy for me to change it. I just pushed your suggested changes.
---
If your project is
GitHub user deanchen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5866
Fix typo in Dataframes.py introduced in [SPARK-3444]
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/deanchen/spark patch-1
Alternatively you
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5786#issuecomment-98379921
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
