GitHub user kaka1992 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5870
[SPARK-7324][SQL] Add DataFrame.dropDuplicates
Similar to
http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/generated/pandas.DataFrame.drop_duplicates.html
def dropDuplicates(): DataFrame
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5870#issuecomment-98441323
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98441615
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98441609
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98441644
[Test build #31682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31682/consoleFull)
for PR 5867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5820#issuecomment-98442083
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5820#issuecomment-98442658
[Test build #31683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31683/consoleFull)
for PR 5820 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5820#issuecomment-98442134
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user deenar commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5030#issuecomment-98444134
Sean
I need some guidance on adding Mima excludes. Does the additional optional
parameter count new method or I do i need some other kind of exclude such
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4435#issuecomment-98446030
@squito - I think if Marcello took a good pass then we can probably pull
this one in. I will try to look at it by or on Monday as well just to get
another pair of eyes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5741#issuecomment-98466928
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5741#issuecomment-98466924
[Test build #31686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31686/consoleFull)
for PR 5741 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5741#issuecomment-98466927
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448327
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448330
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448434
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448433
[Test build #31684 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31684/consoleFull)
for PR 5830 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448360
[Test build #31684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31684/consoleFull)
for PR 5830 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448463
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448467
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5830#issuecomment-98448500
[Test build #31685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31685/consoleFull)
for PR 5830 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5741#issuecomment-98453707
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5741#issuecomment-98453711
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5741#issuecomment-98453889
[Test build #31686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31686/consoleFull)
for PR 5741 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5741#issuecomment-98454275
Made another commit with received feedback. Changes are:
* removed implicit conversion, ConfiguredTimeout must be constructed with a
description
* more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5820#issuecomment-98454364
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5820#issuecomment-98454361
[Test build #31683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31683/consoleFull)
for PR 5820 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5820#issuecomment-98454363
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5030#issuecomment-98454640
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5030#issuecomment-98454644
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5030#issuecomment-98454676
[Test build #31687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31687/consoleFull)
for PR 5030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98456005
[Test build #31682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31682/consoleFull)
for PR 5867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5030#issuecomment-98455964
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98456008
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98456007
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5030#issuecomment-98455958
[Test build #31687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31687/consoleFull)
for PR 5030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5030#issuecomment-98455962
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98457734
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98457732
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5719#issuecomment-98457778
[Test build #31688 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31688/consoleFull)
for PR 5719 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5869#issuecomment-98459243
This is turning an example into a small utility function. I'm a little wary
of this. We've had people find these examples in the past and mistakenly assume
they're the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557464
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -23,29 +23,43 @@ import
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557462
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -23,29 +23,43 @@ import
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557466
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -68,13 +76,23 @@ private[sql] object StatFunctions {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557468
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatSuite.scala ---
@@ -43,12 +43,18 @@ class DataFrameStatSuite extends FunSuite {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557463
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -23,29 +23,43 @@ import
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557460
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -23,29 +23,43 @@ import
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557454
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -875,6 +875,27 @@ def fillna(self, value, subset=None):
return
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557467
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaDataFrameSuite.java ---
@@ -188,6 +188,13 @@ public void testFrequentItems() {
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557457
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -28,6 +28,32 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.stat._
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5580#issuecomment-98499719
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5580#issuecomment-98499720
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5842#discussion_r29557554
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -77,4 +78,42 @@ private[sql] object StatFunctions {
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557544
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -23,29 +23,43 @@ import
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557541
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -23,29 +23,43 @@ import
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5858#discussion_r29557546
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -23,29 +23,43 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5580#issuecomment-98499717
[Test build #31695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31695/consoleFull)
for PR 5580 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5850#issuecomment-98502577
@irmen Is Pyrolite 4.4 fully compatible with Python 2.6.6? We saw a test
failure for Python 2.6.6:
~~~
Github user debasish83 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5869#issuecomment-98504419
Implicit lambda should not affect the explicit resultsI will take a
closer look into the recommendForAll and compare with my old version..
---
If your project is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5801#discussion_r29567124
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/json/JsonRDD2.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,419 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5842#discussion_r29567133
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -77,4 +79,27 @@ private[sql] object StatFunctions {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5865#issuecomment-98594401
[Test build #31728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31728/consoleFull)
for PR 5865 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5801#issuecomment-98594076
[Test build #31727 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31727/consoleFull)
for PR 5801 at commit
Github user XuTingjun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5550#issuecomment-98594154
@srowen Can you deal with this patch? Thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5839#discussion_r29567074
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,24 @@ class Column(protected[sql] val expr: Expression)
extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5836#issuecomment-98594065
[Test build #31726 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31726/consoleFull)
for PR 5836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5865#issuecomment-98594331
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5836#issuecomment-98594171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5836#issuecomment-98594169
[Test build #31726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31726/consoleFull)
for PR 5836 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5836#issuecomment-98594172
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5865#issuecomment-98594338
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5865#issuecomment-98594263
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98537320
[Test build #31711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31711/consoleFull)
for PR 5867 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4435#discussion_r29559782
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/TaskSorting.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+package org.apache.spark.status.api.v1;/*
+ *
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5850#issuecomment-98537287
@mengxr You might want to look into
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3524, a followup JIRA that @davies
created to remove a workaround introduced in #2365
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5842#issuecomment-98544868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5842#issuecomment-98544864
[Test build #31704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31704/consoleFull)
for PR 5842 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5842#issuecomment-98544869
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4450#discussion_r29561399
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockObjectWriter.scala ---
@@ -54,9 +54,14 @@ private[spark] abstract class BlockObjectWriter(val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5876#issuecomment-98558837
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5876#issuecomment-98558834
[Test build #31713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31713/consoleFull)
for PR 5876 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5876#issuecomment-98558838
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98534694
[Test build #31709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31709/consoleFull)
for PR 5867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98537247
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98537265
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98537262
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98537266
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5868#issuecomment-98537144
[Test build #31710 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31710/consoleFull)
for PR 5868 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5868#issuecomment-98537148
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5868#issuecomment-98537149
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5872#issuecomment-98545946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5872#issuecomment-98545947
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5872#issuecomment-98545942
[Test build #31707 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31707/consoleFull)
for PR 5872 at commit
GitHub user tedyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5874
Set null as default value for TaskContextImpl#taskMemoryManager
@JoshRosen
Please take a look.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5874#issuecomment-98547145
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98551671
[Test build #31711 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31711/consoleFull)
for PR 5867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98551711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5867#issuecomment-98551712
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5876#issuecomment-98558662
[Test build #31713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31713/consoleFull)
for PR 5876 at commit
1 - 100 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
