Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8270#issuecomment-132125860
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8271#issuecomment-132125854
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8271#issuecomment-132125866
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8225#issuecomment-132125864
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8270#issuecomment-132128034
[Test build #41117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41117/consoleFull)
for PR 8270 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-132136261
[Test build #41118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41118/consoleFull)
for PR 8033 at commit
Github user watermen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8125#discussion_r37279370
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -283,7 +284,7 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
_minSplitsPerRDD)
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8272
[SPARK-10070
`Lists.newArrayList` - `Arrays.asList`
CC @jkbradley @feynmanliang
Anybody into replacing usages of `Lists.newArrayList` in the examples /
source code too? this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257#issuecomment-132140589
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257#issuecomment-132140657
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7602#issuecomment-132142502
[Test build #1649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1649/consoleFull)
for PR 7602 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257#issuecomment-132142836
[Test build #41119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41119/consoleFull)
for PR 8257 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8272#issuecomment-132148767
[Test build #41120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41120/console)
for PR 8272 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#discussion_r37281626
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -122,7 +123,15 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8272#issuecomment-132148952
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8069#issuecomment-132169281
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257#issuecomment-132169275
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257#issuecomment-132170849
[Test build #41122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41122/consoleFull)
for PR 8257 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8224#issuecomment-132171788
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132125000
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8270
[SPARK-10083] [SQL] CaseWhen should support type coercion of DecimalType
and FractionalType
create t1 (a decimal(7, 2), b long);
select case when 1=1 then a else 1.0 end from t1;
select
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132125462
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132125460
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132125415
[Test build #41112 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41112/console)
for PR 8200 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8271#issuecomment-132127697
[Test build #41115 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41115/consoleFull)
for PR 8271 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8225#issuecomment-132127696
[Test build #41116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41116/consoleFull)
for PR 8225 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8227#issuecomment-132127657
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7854#issuecomment-132127527
@jkbradley should this find a place in 1.5 or can this wait?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8227#issuecomment-132127380
[Test build #41114 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41114/console)
for PR 8227 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8227#issuecomment-132127653
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-132133111
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8268#issuecomment-132149042
[Test build #41101 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41101/console)
for PR 8268 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8125#issuecomment-132149046
@scwf @watermen I agree that combining small files is a useful feature.
Essentially, we need to add a `coalesce(n)` when appropriate. But this PR has
several
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8272#issuecomment-132148951
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8069#issuecomment-132155527
[Test build #1648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1648/console)
for PR 8069 at commit
Github user aseigneurin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8152#issuecomment-132155133
I like the fact that `IndexToString` is a standard `Transformer`. One thing
though, is that I don't see how to use it in the same `Pipeline` as a
`StringIndexer`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8156#issuecomment-132172352
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132124847
[Test build #41096 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41096/console)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132124998
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8256#issuecomment-132126757
@XiaoqingWang thank you for updating.
`dev/lint-scala` is a useful tool to check Scala code. You should run it on
your local machine before sending a PR and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8231#discussion_r37279596
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -463,12 +463,23 @@ class Analyzer(
// Find
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8225#issuecomment-132139069
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8225#issuecomment-132139067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8271#issuecomment-132148313
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273
[SPARK-10040][SQL] Use batch insert for JDBC writing
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10040
We should use batch insert instead of single row in JDBC.
You can merge this
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7874#discussion_r37281607
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -118,9 +118,11 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8271#issuecomment-132148312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8271#issuecomment-132147913
[Test build #41115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41115/console)
for PR 8271 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#issuecomment-132151841
[Test build #41121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41121/consoleFull)
for PR 8273 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7997#issuecomment-132151406
that seems reasonable -- @davies ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8165#issuecomment-132153168
Sorry for the late reply.
I think it's great to have a general mechanism to check whether we can
safely cast type `A` to type `B` without losing any
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8264#issuecomment-132153354
[Test build #41104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41104/console)
for PR 8264 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-132169942
[Test build #41118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41118/console)
for PR 8033 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-132170089
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-132170083
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8224#issuecomment-132171787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8224#issuecomment-132171747
[Test build #41107 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41107/console)
for PR 8224 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8156#issuecomment-132172349
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132083744
@feynmanliang I have moved the guide to `ml-linear-models`. Can you give
another pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132083259
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8178#issuecomment-132086031
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8256#discussion_r37269321
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/GaussianMixtureModel.scala
---
@@ -53,32 +54,48 @@ class GaussianMixtureModel(
Github user yinyao123 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8182#issuecomment-132095859
Great. But is there any reason why 64 is chosen in particular?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8268#issuecomment-132102923
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8268#issuecomment-132102901
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257#issuecomment-132108499
[Test build #41103 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41103/consoleFull)
for PR 8257 at commit
Github user watermen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8156#issuecomment-132112643
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8267#issuecomment-132114935
[Test build #41110 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41110/consoleFull)
for PR 8267 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132118418
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8257#issuecomment-132118456
[Test build #41103 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41103/console)
for PR 8257 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132118312
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132118301
[Test build #41109 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41109/console)
for PR 8266 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132118237
[Test build #41106 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41106/console)
for PR 8200 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132118271
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132118414
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8266#issuecomment-132118293
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132118268
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#issuecomment-132120993
[Test build #41112 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41112/consoleFull)
for PR 8200 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8225#issuecomment-132125881
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8270#issuecomment-132125880
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8225#issuecomment-132138712
[Test build #41116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41116/console)
for PR 8225 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8238#issuecomment-132141189
The test failures must be spurious. The fix must be correct since there is
no method called `getBlockLocation` anywhere now. Merging ...
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#issuecomment-132149086
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8273#issuecomment-132149044
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8268#issuecomment-132149365
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8205#discussion_r37281900
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -654,7 +654,11 @@ for expanded in polyDF.select(polyFeatures).take(3):
`StringIndexer` encodes a string column of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8268#issuecomment-132149361
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8238#issuecomment-132167352
thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8069#issuecomment-132171144
[Test build #41123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41123/consoleFull)
for PR 8069 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8033#issuecomment-132132992
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8238
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8272#issuecomment-132142148
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8272#issuecomment-132142103
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8196#issuecomment-132154777
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8196#issuecomment-132154701
[Test build #41102 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41102/console)
for PR 8196 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8196#issuecomment-132154773
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8269#issuecomment-132168710
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8269#issuecomment-132168335
[Test build #41105 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41105/console)
for PR 8269 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8269#issuecomment-132168706
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8264#issuecomment-132084853
[Test build #41091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41091/console)
for PR 8264 at commit
1 - 100 of 1166 matches
Mail list logo
