Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-138480264
sorry too late to see that, I will update it today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652#issuecomment-138465820
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652#issuecomment-138465777
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-138474776
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-138463805
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-138463793
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138468564
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138468566
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138468472
[Test build #42125 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42125/console)
for PR 8650 at commit
Github user wulei-bj-cn commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8533#issuecomment-138486424
@CodingCat Thanks so much for your suggestion! It does sound fair/smart to
make the patch as cleaner as possible. As you suggested, I moved the fixes into
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8362#issuecomment-138493630
@rxin the dense version of HLL++ is ready. We could also add this, and add
the sparse logic in a follow-up PR. Let me know what you think. I'll close if
you'd rather
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138464068
[Test build #42123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42123/consoleFull)
for PR 8583 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652#issuecomment-138467535
[Test build #42126 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42126/consoleFull)
for PR 8652 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-138476140
[Test build #42127 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42127/consoleFull)
for PR 8476 at commit
Github user trevorcai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8609#issuecomment-138480624
Took a brief look - I have a quick high level thought.
The motivation behind the patch is to replace the redundant functionality
of `predictNodeIndex` with the
Github user yjshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8101#issuecomment-138497422
Sorry for my late reply.
MySQLIntegrationSuite would fail with:
```
Error Message
Image pull failed: mysql:latest: ProgressMessage{id=null,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-138449666
[Test build #1725 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1725/console)
for PR 8597 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8651#issuecomment-138456590
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-138456626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-138456628
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8651#issuecomment-138456591
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8651#issuecomment-138456453
[Test build #42120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42120/console)
for PR 8651 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-138456494
[Test build #42119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42119/console)
for PR 8597 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138459076
[Test build #42122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42122/console)
for PR 8650 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138459005
[Test build #42122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42122/consoleFull)
for PR 8650 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138459078
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138459077
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138462685
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user baishuo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6745#issuecomment-138462580
hi @andrewor14 @liancheng , This patch didnt pass some test. Can close it :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#discussion_r38897017
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -229,4 +232,322 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138462606
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-138465214
[Test build #42124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42124/consoleFull)
for PR 7118 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#issuecomment-138493977
@yanboliang how about fixing SPARK-10479 here too? it's very similar.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ryan-williams commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#discussion_r38893879
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -45,17 +45,65 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138458027
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138458014
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138465382
[Test build #42125 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42125/consoleFull)
for PR 8650 at commit
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652
[SPARK-10484][SQL] Optimize the cartesian join with broadcast join for some
cases
In some cases, we can broadcast the smaller relation in cartesian join,
which improve the performance
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-138469526
[Test build #42124 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42124/console)
for PR 7118 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-138469627
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7118#issuecomment-138469620
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8648#issuecomment-138447507
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8648#issuecomment-138447506
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8648#issuecomment-138447486
[Test build #42121 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42121/console)
for PR 8648 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-138451789
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-138451786
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8597#issuecomment-138451412
[Test build #42118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42118/console)
for PR 8597 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8509#discussion_r38897192
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -229,4 +229,81 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-138474836
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8646#discussion_r38905968
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -217,13 +217,13 @@ a cluster, as described in the [programming
guide](programming-guide.html#initia
#
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138464950
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8650#issuecomment-138464930
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user taishi-oss commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8534#issuecomment-138488219
Sorry for being late.
I modified @since annotations.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138501734
[Test build #42123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42123/console)
for PR 8583 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-138511440
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-138511420
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-138515041
[Test build #42129 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42129/consoleFull)
for PR 8537 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#issuecomment-138514053
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#discussion_r38912199
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -468,7 +468,9 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[ml]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8629#issuecomment-138519652
[Test build #1728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1728/console)
for PR 8629 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-138525124
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-138525122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8537#issuecomment-138524680
[Test build #42129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42129/console)
for PR 8537 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#discussion_r38916650
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -45,17 +45,65 @@ import
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#discussion_r38916643
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ActiveJob.scala ---
@@ -23,18 +23,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.TaskContext
import
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#discussion_r38916631
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -720,31 +843,82 @@ class DAGScheduler(
try {
// New
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8180#issuecomment-138533050
LGTM except some nits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138502075
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138502078
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652#issuecomment-138510593
Looks this is a part of #7417
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#issuecomment-138513973
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#issuecomment-138513235
@srowen OK, I have updated this PR to fix both
[SPARK-10479](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10479) and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8653#issuecomment-138533670
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8653#issuecomment-138533603
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user dragos opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8653
[SPARK-6350][Mesos] Fine-grained mode scheduler respects mesosExecutor.cores
This is a regression introduced in #4960, this commit fixes it and adds a
test.
@tnachen @andrewor14 please
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8433#issuecomment-138507718
Just giving this one more go through Jenkins, but still LGTM. our test
framework is just testing Scala 2.10, not 2.11. However, it seems like this
patch can only make it
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138519275
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138519290
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8611#issuecomment-138521533
[Test build #42128 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42128/console)
for PR 8611 at commit
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8533#discussion_r38914955
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskLocation.scala
---
@@ -35,16 +37,26 @@ case class ExecutorCacheTaskLocation(override val host:
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8533#discussion_r38915025
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskLocation.scala
---
@@ -35,16 +37,26 @@ case class ExecutorCacheTaskLocation(override val host:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#issuecomment-138527276
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8653#issuecomment-138534010
I'm working on another fix for SPARK-7874, and will remove some of the
duplication in tests, but I wanted to keep this PR as simple as possible (in
line with the trivial
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-138544481
@Sephiroth-Lin can you rebase this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652#issuecomment-138500699
[Test build #42126 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42126/console)
for PR 8652 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652#issuecomment-138500846
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8611#issuecomment-138509440
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8583#issuecomment-138520479
[Test build #42131 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42131/consoleFull)
for PR 8583 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#issuecomment-138527174
[Test build #42130 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42130/console)
for PR 8641 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#issuecomment-138527275
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-138505965
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-138505968
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8476#issuecomment-138505828
[Test build #42127 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42127/console)
for PR 8476 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8647#discussion_r38910982
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -329,6 +329,8 @@ def cast(self, dataType):
[Row(ages=u'2'), Row(ages=u'5')]
>>>
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8611#issuecomment-138510966
[Test build #42128 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42128/consoleFull)
for PR 8611 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8641#discussion_r38912950
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -468,7 +468,9 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8533#issuecomment-138526861
ok, this patch is looking good to me (after the changes I mentioned above)
time for others to judge @kayousterhout @srowen @andrewor14 @JoshRosen
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8652#issuecomment-138500841
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8611#issuecomment-138509653
@rotationsymmetry I agree with you, updated PR. Thanks for your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8611#issuecomment-138509491
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 762 matches
Mail list logo
