Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9050#issuecomment-147116624
@hvanhovell Yes, we will backport it to 1.5 branch. So it will be fixed in
1.5.2.
Let me explain the cause. Every attribute reference has an `exprId`. If you
do
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147094658
@vanzin @tgravescs when spark-submit --master yarn-cluster --jars
/users/xxx.jar and spark.yarn.user.classpath.first=true, the jars of the
command are not in
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9054#issuecomment-147104530
The cached thread pool does not create threads if threads are available:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9064#issuecomment-147109344
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9063#issuecomment-147109346
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9009#issuecomment-147117437
@zero323 Good point, that's better for sure. Do you mind preparing a patch
for 1.6 for that? (I don't think it's necessary to backport it everywhere.)
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147094723
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147096063
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user adrian555 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#discussion_r41698039
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1881,3 +1881,33 @@ setMethod("as.data.frame",
}
collect(x)
})
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147096650
[Test build #43530 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43530/console)
for PR 9045 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147096659
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147096660
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9023#discussion_r41699681
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -100,3 +100,36 @@ setMethod("corr",
statFunctions <- callJMethod(x@sdf, "stat")
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#discussion_r41700341
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -1239,6 +1254,24 @@ object SQLContext {
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9062#issuecomment-147117151
This patch includes updates to a lot of pom files. Can you please remove
those?
(Thanks for sending all of these backports, btw!)
---
If your project is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147094732
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9064
[SPARK-10973][ML][PYTHON] Fix IndexError exception on SparseVector when
asked for index after the last non-zero entry
See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9009 for details.
You can merge this
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9062
[SPARK-10973][ML][PYTHON] Fix IndexError exception on SparseVector when
asked for index after the last non-zero entry
See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9009 for details.
You can merge this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9062#issuecomment-147107757
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9063
[SPARK-10973][ML][PYTHON] Fix IndexError exception on SparseVector when
asked for index after the last non-zero entry
See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9009 for details.
You can merge this
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#discussion_r41699843
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1881,3 +1881,33 @@ setMethod("as.data.frame",
}
collect(x)
})
+
Github user zero323 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9009#issuecomment-147114654
It should be possible to push this check before binary search:
8a695fe2c3344acd19279fcd539177426d436a02
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9064#issuecomment-147116759
LGTM pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9064#issuecomment-147117889
[Test build #1872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1872/console)
for PR 9064 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9054#issuecomment-147102012
The executorService in this case is used to initiate retry for fetching
blocks.
In a congested network environment, ForkJoinPool would serve better.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-147102028
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-147102033
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zero323 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9009#issuecomment-147108493
@jkbradley https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9062,
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9063,
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9064
---
If your project is set
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#discussion_r41699442
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1881,3 +1881,33 @@ setMethod("as.data.frame",
}
collect(x)
})
+
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9063#issuecomment-147117076
LGTM pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147095194
[Test build #43530 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43530/consoleFull)
for PR 9045 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147096062
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-147102431
[Test build #43531 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43531/consoleFull)
for PR 9008 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9062#issuecomment-147116668
[Test build #1874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1874/consoleFull)
for PR 9062 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9063#issuecomment-147116645
[Test build #1873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1873/consoleFull)
for PR 9063 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9064#issuecomment-147116649
[Test build #1872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1872/consoleFull)
for PR 9064 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8648#discussion_r41700924
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -260,127 +263,126 @@ private[ann] trait ActivationFunction extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147095004
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9045#issuecomment-147095008
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9012#issuecomment-147113185
+1 on R-like signature, just want to call out we should be careful with
breaking API changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user adrian555 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147096207
@sun-rui First, the current subsetting function '$' of DataFrame ends up
with a 'Column' class instead of a real column access of 'DataFrame'. So to
operate on one
Github user NarineK commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8952#issuecomment-147119595
Thanks @sun-rui,
with respect to export for as.DataFrame. I moved as.DataFrame up, because
@felixcheung noted that we should pay attention to alphabetical
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9063#issuecomment-147122857
[Test build #1873 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1873/consoleFull)
for PR 9063 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9038#issuecomment-147125927
Okay, I have a theory as to what might be causing the test failure. The
assertion failure is only occurring in the final aggregation,
`finalAndCompleteAggregate`.
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8952#issuecomment-147146517
@NarineK, forget about my comment about export for as.DataFrame. I deleted
it:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#discussion_r41704241
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -1239,6 +1254,24 @@ object SQLContext {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9023#discussion_r41704334
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -100,3 +100,36 @@ setMethod("corr",
statFunctions <- callJMethod(x@sdf, "stat")
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-147122387
**[Test build #43531 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43531/console)**
for PR 9008 at commit
Github user adrian555 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#discussion_r41701074
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1881,3 +1881,33 @@ setMethod("as.data.frame",
}
collect(x)
})
+
Github user adrian555 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147146800
Hi admin,
The failure is
[error] (core/*:mimaPreviousClassfiles) sbt.ResolveException: download
failed:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-147149816
[Test build #43533 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43533/consoleFull)
for PR 8563 at commit
GitHub user trystanleftwich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9065
[SPARK-11052] Spaces in the build dir causes failures in the build/mvâ¦
â¦n script
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9038#discussion_r41704981
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TungstenAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -134,19 +137,74 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147155599
[Test build #43535 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43535/consoleFull)
for PR 9066 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-147158109
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147157874
[Test build #43536 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43536/consoleFull)
for PR 9058 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-147122395
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9038#discussion_r41701104
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/utils.scala ---
@@ -154,143 +146,150 @@ object Utils {
val
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9038#issuecomment-147141366
ah, `assert(initialInputBufferOffset > 0)` failed because when there is not
grouping expression and the mode is not partial, initialInputBufferOffset will
be 0.
---
If
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9054#issuecomment-147150006
Background:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19528304/how-to-get-the-threadpoolexecutor-to-increase-threads-to-max-before-queueing/19528305#19528305
Toward
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-147151970
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-147151971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-147151956
[Test build #43533 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43533/console)
for PR 8563 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147156068
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147156060
[Test build #43535 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43535/console)
for PR 9066 at commit
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r41705354
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +445,402 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147158207
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r41705352
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +445,402 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r41705505
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +445,402 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r41705389
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +445,402 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r41705434
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +445,402 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9008#issuecomment-147122396
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147122953
[Test build #43532 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43532/consoleFull)
for PR 9031 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9023#discussion_r41704114
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -100,3 +100,36 @@ setMethod("corr",
statFunctions <- callJMethod(x@sdf, "stat")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-147149467
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-147149464
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#discussion_r41705069
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystWriteSupport.scala
---
@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ private[parquet]
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#discussion_r41705075
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/MultiSQLContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147156067
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147156665
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147156679
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147124202
[Test build #43532 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43532/console)
for PR 9031 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147124210
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147124212
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147153030
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147153045
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user adrian555 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#discussion_r41701060
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1881,3 +1881,33 @@ setMethod("as.data.frame",
}
collect(x)
})
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147122665
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9031#issuecomment-147122669
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9062#issuecomment-147123397
[Test build #1874 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1874/consoleFull)
for PR 9062 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#discussion_r41703591
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -1239,6 +1254,24 @@ object SQLContext {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147153492
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147153450
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066
[SPARK-11053] Remove use of KVIterator in SortBasedAggregationIterator
SortBasedAggregationIterator uses a KVIterator interface in order to
process input rows as key-value pairs, but this use of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147155854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147155853
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9058#issuecomment-147155850
[Test build #43534 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43534/console)
for PR 9058 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9066#issuecomment-147158226
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r41705594
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +445,402 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r41705597
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +445,402 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
